Helicobacter pylori and nonulcer dyspepsia in childhood: clinical pattern, diagnostic techniques, and bacterial strains.

BACKGROUND: This is a report of the results of a multicenter study performed in children with dyspepsia from five pediatric centers in Puglia, a region in southern Italy. In the study, clinical features of Helicobacter pylori infection, the reliability of diagnostic techniques, and the involvement of bacterial strains were examined. METHODS: Fifty-three outpatients with dyspepsia enrolled in our study and compiled a diary recording clinical symptoms in patients before they underwent the following diagnostic techniques: endoscopy, biopsy for histologic analysis, rapid urease test, 13C urea breath test, serology specific for immunoglobulin (Ig)G and anti-CagA and VacA. RESULTS: H. pylori showed a prevalence of 30.2% (n = 16). Histologic positivity was seen in all patients at the antral level (H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis). In the gastric body, bacterial chronic active gastritis was present only in six patients (H. pylori-associated chronic pangastritis). Clinical evaluation showed a significant difference in favor of subjects positive for H. pylori only for epigastric burning and/or pain (p < 0.001). The comparison of results of diagnostic tests, using histology as the gold standard, showed sensitivity and specificity of more than 93% for 13C urea breath test and more than 85% for rapid urease test and serology. Anti-CagA antibodies were found in 64.3% and anti-VacA antibodies in 42.8% of H. pylori-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori prevalence in children with dyspepsia from the geographic area studied is comparable with that found in other developed countries. Approximately 50% of the studied patients were infected by cytotoxic strains. The urea breath test was the most reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool and is suitable for routine use, although endoscopy with histologic assessment remains the definitive investigation and is particularly important in patients with positive serology for CagA and VacA. Finally, the frequency of aggressive strains in our region seems to affect the clinical pattern; this emphasizes the importance of definitive diagnosis in children and offers a new role for serology.

Halitosis and Helicobacter pylori: a possible relationship.

With the aim of investigating a possible relationship between "objective" halitosis (established by sulfide levels in the breath) and Helicobacter pylori, we performed a study in 58 dyspeptic patients reported to suffer from "bad breath." Furthermore, we evaluated the effects on halitosis of eradication therapy (only for H. pylori-positive patients) and chlorhexidine antiseptic mouth rinses (in all patients). Sulfide compound assay indicated objective halitosis in 52/58 patients, 30 of whom were positive and 22 negative for H. pylori. In 19/30 eradication by double therapy provoked a decrease to below the cutoff value of sulfide levels in 15. In the other 11 of the 30 subjects, in whom H. pylori positivity persisted, halitosis parameters did not change. Chlorexidine reduced sulfides to below the cutoff value in 16/22 H. pylori-negative patients, but did not provoke any change in the 11 unsuccessfully treated H. pylori-positive subjects. In these, objective halitosis disappeared only after a successful eradication by triple therapy (9/11). Our results show a possible association between halitosis and H. pylori since bacterial eradication may resolve the symptom. Antiseptic mouthwashes may be effective only in absence of H. pylori, when halitosis may be due to oral putrefactive microbial activity. In a small number of subjects the cause and treatment of halitosis need to be clarified.