Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 202: 220-225.e2, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30172432

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and HDL-C thresholds for pediatric nonfasting lipid screens that are more predictive of the need for lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and estimate numbers of potentially avoidable fasting lipid panels. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective review of children and youths aged 8-21 years presenting for preventive cardiology care, initial lipid results, recommendations for pharmacotherapy, and presence of additional cardiovascular risk factors were noted. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis calculated threshold lipid values predicting the need for pharmacotherapy and were applied to 2 screening populations. Rates of potentially unnecessary fasting lipid panels were calculated. RESULTS: A non-HDL-C value >156 mg/dL for children with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factors and >199 mg/dL for children without risk factors conferred 95% or greater sensitivity in predicting a recommendation for pharmacotherapy with higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value compared with current guidelines. HDL-C was a poor predictor of pharmacotherapy. Application of the current thresholds to screening populations indicated that 38.5%-92.3% of follow-up fasting lipid panels would not result in pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Using higher non-HDL-C and lower HDL-C thresholds could prevent unnecessary follow-up lipid panels and reduce patient anxiety, cost, and time. This could improve compliance with universal pediatric lipid screening for both health care providers and families.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cholesterol, HDL/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypolipidemic Agents/administration & dosage , Lipids/standards , Adolescent , Age Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Child , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/complications , Male , Mass Screening , Predictive Value of Tests , Primary Prevention/methods , Reference Standards , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Young Adult
2.
J Pediatr ; 178: 285-287, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592098

ABSTRACT

Charts of 42 children with familial hypercholesterolemia from a dyslipidemia clinic were reviewed for initial cholesterol screen indication and cascade screening results. Indications were universal screening (8/28 after guideline release, none before), family history (26/42), risk factor (5/42), and other (3/42). Cascade screening identified 63 relatives with unknown familial hypercholesterolemia.


Subject(s)
Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis , Lipids/blood , Mass Screening/methods , Adolescent , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL