Usefulness of IgA Anti-α-fodrin Antibodies in Combination with Rheumatoid Factor and/or Antinuclear Antibodies as Substitute Immunological Criterion in Sjögren Syndrome with Negative Anti-SSA/SSB Antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of anti-α-fodrin antibodies (AFA) in combination with rheumatoid factor (RF) and/or antinuclear antibodies (ANA) as an alternative immunological criterion for Sjögren syndrome (SS) among patients with negative anti-Ro/La serology. METHODS: The study included 350 patients (100 with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis, and 50 with primary SS) randomly selected and assessed for SS. All patients were tested for ANA, RF, anti-SSA/SSB, and AFA antibodies. SS diagnosis was made on a clinical basis by 2 rheumatologists based on the 6-item screening questionnaire, Schirmer-I test, nonstimulated whole salivary flow rate, fluorescein staining test, autoantibodies, lip biopsy, and medical chart review. Non-SS was defined as lack of clinical diagnosis and not fulfilling the American-European Consensus Group classification criteria and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The ACR criteria were applied substituting the immunological criteria as follows: (1) RF plus ANA > 1:320, (2) RF plus AFA, (3) ANA > 1:320 plus AFA, (4) RF alone, and (5) 2 positive tests out of RF, ANA > 1:320, or AFA. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratio positivity with 95% CI for each criterion. RESULTS: There were 236 patients (67%) who tested negative for anti-SSA/SSB antibodies, of whom 65 (27.5%) were clinically diagnosed as SS, and 149 (63%) with non-SS. RF + AFA and ANA + AFA performed similarly to RF + ANA > 1:320. The model 2 out of 3 of RF, ANA, or AFA improved the sensitivity from 56.9% to 70.7%, although the specificity decreased. CONCLUSION: The combination AFA + RF, AFA + ANA > 1:320, or at least 2 out of 3, performed well as a proxy immunological test for patients with SS and negative Ro/La serology.

Utility of the American-European Consensus Group and American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Sjögren's syndrome in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of the American-European Consensus Group (AECG) and ACR Classification Criteria for SS in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty patients with primary SS, SLE, RA or scleroderma were randomly selected from our patient registry. Each patient was clinically diagnosed as probable/definitive SS or non-SS following a standardized evaluation including clinical symptoms and manifestations, confirmatory tests, fluorescein staining test, autoantibodies, lip biopsy and medical chart review. Using the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard, the degree of agreement with each criteria set and between the criteria sets was estimated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four (44%) patients were diagnosed with SS. The AECG criteria were incomplete in 36 patients (10.3%) and the ACR criteria in 96 (27.4%; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, their ability to classify patients was almost identical, with a sensitivity of 61.6 vs 62.3 and a specificity of 94.3 vs 91.3, respectively. Either set of criteria was met by 123 patients (80%); 95 (61.7%) met the AECG criteria and 96 (62.3%) met the ACR criteria, but only 68 (44.2%) patients met both sets. The concordance rate between clinical diagnosis and AECG or ACR criteria was moderate (k statistic 0.58 and 0.55, respectively). Among 99 patients with definitive SS sensitivity was 83.3 vs 77.7 and specificity was 90.8 vs 85.6, respectively. A discrepancy between clinical diagnosis and criteria was seen in 59 patients (17%). CONCLUSION: The feasibility of the SS AECG criteria is superior to that of the ACR criteria, however, their performance was similar among patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. A subset of SS patients is still missed by both criteria sets.

[Association between acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and Guillain-Barré syndrome in an adult]. / Asociación de encefalomielitis diseminada aguda y síndrome de Guillain-Barré en un adulto.

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) are commonly recognized as separated entities involving different parts of the nervous system. However, they share some features such as: autoimmune pathogenesis, myelin injury and previous history of viral infections or vaccination. We report the case of a 41 year-old man who developed fever, lower limbs weakness and obtundation fifteen days after an acute gastroenteritis. Neurological examination showed patellar hypereflexia, bilateral Babinski and neurogenic bladder. Twenty-four hours later he developed flaccid paraparesis, generalized areflexia and respiratory failure that was supported by mechanical ventilation. Cerebrospinal fluid showed mononuclear pleocytosis and elevated proteins. Electrodiagnosis showed important reduction of conduction velocity on both peroneal nerves. Magnetic Resonance Imaging revealed white matter lesions in brain, pons and thoracic levels of the spinal cord. Diagnosis of the association between ADEM and GBS (ASADEM-GBS) was made and treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin was started. The patient recovered motor, sensory and bladder functions and he was able to walk six months later. ASADEM-GBS is an uncommon entity generally considered of poor outcome; however a rapid diagnosis and treatment can substantially improve the prognosis.

Asociación de encefalomielitis diseminada aguda y síndrome de Guillain-Barré en un adulto / Association between acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and Guillain Barré syndrome in an adult

La encefalomielitis diseminada aguda (EMDA) y el síndrome de Guillain-Barré (SGB) son reconocidas como entidades distintas, que afectan diferentes sectores del sistema nervioso, pero que comparten varias características tales como la patogenia autoinmune, el impacto sobre la mielina y el antecedente de infección viral o vacunación una a cuatro semanas previas al cuadro clínico. Se presenta un paciente varón de 41 años de edad que consultó por presentar fiebre, debilidad en miembros inferiores y somnolencia dos semanas posteriores a episodio agudo de gastroenteritis. Al ingreso se constató deterioro del sensorio (obnubilación) hiperreflexia patelar, Babinski bilateral y vejiga neurogénica. Veinticuatro horas después desarrolló paraplejía flácida y arreflexia generalizada, requiriendo asistencia respiratoria mecánica por insuficiencia respiratoria. El líquido cefalorraquídeo mostró pleocitosis mononuclear e hiperproteinorraquia. El estudio electrofisiológico evidenció importante disminución de las velocidades de conducción en ambos nervios ciáticos poplíteos externos, compatible con polineuropatía desmielinizante. La resonancia magnética nuclear mostró imágenes compatibles con desmielinización en cerebro, protuberancia y segmentos medulares dorsales. Se realizó diagnóstico de ASEMDA-SGB e inició tratamiento con metilprednisolona e inmunoglobulina intravenosa. Evolucionó favorablemente, recuperando las funciones motoras, vesical y la sensibilidad, siendo capaz de deambular luego de seis meses. La asociación de EMDA y SGB (ASEMDA-SGB) es una condición infrecuente, generalmente señalada como de mal pronóstico, en la cual un diagnóstico precoz y un rápido y enérgico tratamiento pueden mejorar substancialmente la evolución.

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) are commonly recognized as separated entities involving different parts of the nervous system. However, they share some features such as: autoimmune pathogenesis, myelin injury and previous history of viral infections or vaccination. We report the case of a 41 year-old man who developed fever, lower limbs weakness and obtundation fifteen days after an acute gastroenteritis. Neurological examination showed patellar hypereflexia, bilateral Babinski and neurogenic bladder. Twenty-four hours later he developed flaccid paraparesis, generalized areflexia and respiratory failure that was supported by mechanical ventilation. Cerebrospinal fluid showed mononuclear pleocytosis and elevated proteins. Electrodiagnosis showed important reduction of conduction velocity on both peroneal nerves. Magnetic Resonance Imaging revealed white matter lesions in brain, pons and thoracic levels of the spinal cord. Diagnosis of the association between ADEM and GBS (ASADEM-GBS) was made and treatment with corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin was started. The patient recovered motor, sensory and bladder functions and he was able to walk six months later. ASADEM-GBS is an uncommon entity generally considered of poor outcome; however a rapid diagnosis and treatment can substantially improve the prognosis.

Similarities and differences between primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical, serological, and histopathological characteristics of primary (pSS) and secondary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). METHODS: Fifty subjects with pSS and 300 with connective tissue diseases (CTD; systemic lupus erythematosus 100, rheumatoid arthritis 100, scleroderma 100) were selected randomly from our patient registry. Selected patients were assessed for fulfillment of the American-European Consensus Group criteria for SS using a 3-phase approach: screening (European questionnaire, Schirmer-I test, wafer test), confirmatory (fluorescein staining test, nonstimulated whole salivary flow, anti-Ro/La antibodies), and lip biopsy (H&E and immunohistochemical staining for anti-CD20 and anti-CD45RO scored by morphometry). RESULTS: All patients with pSS and 65 with CTD met criteria for SS. Oral symptoms (pSS = 92% and secondary SS = 84%; p = 0.02), parotid enlargement (pSS 56%, secondary SS 9.2%; p < 0.001), and higher prevalence (pSS 82%, secondary SS 41%; p < 0.001) and titers of anti-Ro/La antibodies were more common in pSS. Extraglandular manifestations were similar in both groups, except for Raynaud's phenomenon, which was more common in those with secondary SS (pSS 16% vs secondary SS 41%; p = 0.001). These results remained after 3 different sensitivity analyses. The prevalence of focal infiltration was also similar in both SS varieties; however, a higher B:T cell ratio and higher expression of CD20 cells (2922 vs 607.5 positive cells; p < 0.001) were observed in pSS. CONCLUSION: A higher frequency of oral symptoms and parotid enlargement and stronger B cell activity (autoantibody production and lymphocyte infiltration) were observed in pSS. Whether these results reflect a true difference between the 2 disease entities or derive from underlying variables remains uncertain.