Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 12(3): 365-72, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11855240

ABSTRACT

Health care is a primary need and an important goal for individuals and for society overall. From an ethical perspective, resources should be allocated appropriately so everyone can enjoy the best health care possible. With limited resources available from an economic reimbursement perspective, we need to analyze the philosophy and values that are important to us to make ethical decisions. This article describes key values and philosophies and concerns about societal attempts to reform the system.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Medical , Ethics, Nursing , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Care Rationing/standards , Health Care Reform/economics , Patient Advocacy , Reimbursement Mechanisms/standards , American Nurses' Association , Attitude to Health , Beneficence , Decision Making, Organizational , Humans , Informed Consent , Personal Autonomy , Philosophy, Medical , Philosophy, Nursing , Social Values , United States
2.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 22(6): 967-71, 1995 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7567614

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability and validity of a patient acuity tool for use on a critical care oncology unit. DESIGN: Prototype classification system using therapeutic indicators to describe a patient's acuity. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a research and academic oncology hospital in the Southeastern United States. SAMPLE: Critical care nursing staff including management-level personnel at the research site. METHODS: An acuity tool for critical care was developed using the Johns Hopkins Oncology Center's patient classification system as a model. Content validity indexes were calculated based on ratings of nurse experts. interrater reliability was calculated based on two independent raters: a staff nurse and a patient care manager. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Appropriateness of language and categorization of therapeutic indicators developed for the tool. FINDINGS: The content validity index of the entire tool was 0.85; 24/25 indicators were retained. Reliability was r = 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: The tool is reliable and valid. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Acuity tools can be used to calculate unit productivity and assist with determination of staffing needs. In this age of healthcare reform, it is imperative that personpower needs in all care settings be accurately determined to provide cost-effective and safe care levels.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Nursing Evaluation Research/instrumentation , Nursing Staff/standards , Oncology Nursing/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care , Efficiency , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Southeastern United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...