ABSTRACT
Urea rebound (UR) after hemodialysis (HD) requires the use of equilibrated urea (Ceq) instead of immediate end-dialysis urea (Ct) for correct quantification of HD, which is impractical. A new formula for predicting Ceq in children is suggested in our study. Thirty eight standard pediatric HD sessions (single pool Kt/V = 1.70 +/- 0.35, K = 4.65 +/- 1.14 ml/min/kg, UF coeff. = 3.2-6.2 ml/h/mm Hg, t = 3.80 +/- 0.46 h) in 15 children (M: 6, F: 9), ages 14.5 +/- 3.28 years were analyzed. Blood samples were taken: before, 70 min from the start, at the end, and 60 min after the end of HD sessions. After correlating UR (20.32 +/- 7.74%) to various HD parameters, we found that it was mainly determined by HD efficiency parameters. Therefore we correlated Ceq to HD efficiency parameters (Ct, urea reduction ratio, Kt/V, and K/V) and found a very high correlation between Ct and Ceq (r = 0.973). Linear regression analysis was used to further investigate this relationship, and a new formula to predict Ceq from Ct was obtained (Ceq = 1.085 Ct + 0.729, R2 = 0.946, SE = 0.49, absolute residuals = 0.38 +/- 0.29 mmol/L). In a validation study (10 HD sessions with new set of urea blood samples) the results obtained by the new formula were compared with measured values of Ceq and those obtained by the Smye formulae. Values predicted by the new formula (9.91 +/- 2.92 mmol/L) were not significantly different from the measured values (10.33 +/- 3.44 mmol/L). Absolute error of the new formula was 0.78 +/- 0.73 mmol/L, median 0.65; ie., 6.93 +/- 5.3%, median 7.7%. Ceq predicted by the Smye formulae (10.95 +/- 4.18 mmol/L) also did not significantly differ from the measured values, but absolute error of predicted values was markedly higher (1.21 +/- 0.90 mmol/L, median 0.89; 11.73 +/- 7.72%, median 10.11%; p < 0.05). When predicted Ceq was used for calculating equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V), the new formula resulted in lower absolute error (0.09 +/- 0.07, median 0.08) than the Smye method (0.14 +/- 0.08, median 0.12). We conclude that our simple formula is sufficiently accurate in predicting Ceq in standard pediatric HD and that it is more accurate than the existing Smye formulae, while requiring only pre- and post-HD urea samples. We suggest the use of the new formula for predicting Ceq, which can then be used instead of Ct for a more accurate estimation of double pool Kt/V, URR, V, and PCR.
