Immediate Stress Echocardiography for Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation and disposition of low-risk chest pain (CP) patients in the emergency department (ED) is time consuming and expensive. Low-risk CP often results in hospital admission to rule out myocardial infarction, which leads to additional costs and delays. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess whether an immediate exercise stress echocardiogram (IESE) in the ED will allow safe, efficient, and cost-effective evaluation and discharge of patients with low-risk CP. METHODS: Low-risk CP patients (TIMI [Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction] score 0-1) presenting to the ED with normal electrocardiogram, no history of coronary artery disease, and negative troponin T received IESE. We followed these patients for major adverse cardiac events and compared them to a control cohort of similar-risk patients admitted with traditional care at 1 and 6 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 216 patients, 117 IESE and 109 control. We obtained follow-up at 1 and 6 months in 94% of the IESE group and 88% in the control group. There was no difference in diagnostic catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention between the 2 groups (6.0% and 1.7% vs. 6.4% and 1.8%; p = 0.89). Median time from triage to discharge was significantly shorter with IESE (572.6 min vs. 1466.0 min), resulting in significantly lower cost ($4380.50 vs. $6191.70). There were no adverse events related to IESE or early discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, IESE for low-risk CP patients presenting to the ED has the potential to be equally safe, more expeditious, and more cost effective than admission to an observation unit.

Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this article is to examine the correlation of catheter (cath) based and echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) in a community-based academic hospital setting, particularly in the degree that decision to refer for surgery is altered. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines discourage AS evaluation by invasive pressure measurement if echocardiography (echo) is adequate, but several studies show sizable differences between echo and cardiac catheterization lab (CCL) measurements. We examine this correlation using high quality CCL techniques. METHODS: Sequential patients with suspected AS by echo (n = 40) aged 61-94 underwent catheterization with pressure gradients via left ventricular pressure wire and ascending aorta catheter. The echos leading to the catheterization were independently reviewed by an expert panel to assess the quality of community-based readings. RESULTS: CCL changed assessment of severity of aortic valve area (AVA) by more than 0.3 cm(2) in 25% and 0.5 cm(2) in 8%. Values changed to over or under the surgical threshold of AVA < 1 cm(2) in 30% of the patients. Pearson correlation of 0.35 between measurements of AVA by echo and CCL is lower than earlier studies, which often reported correlation values of 0.90 or greater. Echo expert reviews provided minimal improvement in discrepancies (Pearson correlation of 0.46), suggesting quality of initial interpretation was not the issue. CONCLUSIONS: Cath-echo correlation of AS severity is lower in contemporaneous practice than previously assumed. This can alter the decision for aortic valve replacement. Sole reliance on echo-derived assessment of AS may at times be problematic.

The Value of Quality Improvement Process in the Detection and Correction of Common Errors in Echocardiographic Hemodynamic Parameters in a Busy Echocardiography Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of cardiac structures, ventricular function, and hemodynamics is essential for any echocardiographic laboratory. Quality improvement (QI) processes described by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the Intersocietal Commission (IAC) should be instrumental in reaching this goal. METHODS: All patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) followed by cardiac catheterization within 24 hours at Christiana Care Health System in 2011 and 2012 were identified, with 126 and 133 cases, respectively. Hemodynamic parameters of diastolic function and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) on TTE correlated poorly with catheterization in 2011. An educational process was developed and implemented at quarterly QI meetings based on ASE and IAC recommendations to target frequently encountered errors and provide methods for improved performance. The hemodynamic parameters were then reexamined in 2012 postintervention. RESULTS: Following the QI process, there was significant improvement in the correlation between invasive and echocardiographic hemodynamic measurements in both systolic and diastolic function, and PASP. This reflected in significant better correlations between echo and cath LVEF [R = 0.88, ICC = 0.87 vs. R = 0.85, ICC = 0.85; P < 0.001], average E/E' and of left ventricle end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) [R = 0.62 vs. R = 0.09, P = 0.006] and a better correlation for PASP [R = 0.77, ICC = 0.77 vs. R = 0.30, ICC = 0.31; P = 0.05] in 2012 compared to 2011. CONCLUSION: The QI process, as recommended by ASE and IAC, can allow for identification as well as rectification of quality issues in a large regional academic medical center hospital.

Clopidogrel use throughout pregnancy in a patient with a drug-eluting coronary stent.

BACKGROUND: Little information regarding the potential implications of drug-eluting stents and clopidogrel on pregnancy exists. CASE: We report a case of a 27-year-old woman who received a drug-eluting coronary stent for an acute myocardial infarction and was started on clopidogrel as treatment. She was on clopidogrel when she conceived and delivered a child by cesarean. Her postpartum course was complicated by postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the perinatal and peripartum concerns of these interventions in women of childbearing age. It suggests that cesarean delivery is associated with an elevated risk of perioperative bleeding and may best be approached like other surgical procedures, with the optimal timing of surgery, when feasible, being 5 or more days after the discontinuation of clopidogrel.