Cardio-metabolic health effects of CPAP treatment for sleep apnoea during weight loss: A randomised controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed whether the addition of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during weight loss would enhance cardiometabolic health improvements in patients with obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with overweight or obesity, pre-diabetes and moderatesevere OSA were randomised to receive CPAP therapy with a weight loss programme (CPAP+WL) or a weight loss programme alone (WL alone). PRIMARY OUTCOME: 2-hour glucose assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 24 hr blood pressure, body composition (DEXA) and fasting blood markers. 17 patients completed 3-month follow-up assessments (8 CPAP+WL and 9 WL alone). Overall, participants in both groups lost ∼12 kg which reduced polysomnography determined OSA severity by ∼45 %. In the CPAP+WL group, CPAP use (compliance 5.29 hrs/night) did not improve any outcome above WL alone. There was no improvement in 2-hour glucose in either group. However, in the pooled (n = 17) analysis there were overall improvements in most outcomes including insulin sensitivity (.000965 units, p = .008), sleep systolic BP (- 16.2 mmHg, p = .0003), sleep diastolic BP (-9.8 mmHg, p = 0.02), wake diastolic BP (- 4.3 mmHg, p = .03) and sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Score -3.2, p = .0003). In addition, there were reductions in glucose area under the curve (-230 units, p = .009), total (-0.86 mmol/L, p = 0.006) and LDL cholesterol (-0.58 mmol/L, p = 0.007), triglycerides (-0.75 mmol/L, p = 0.004), fat mass (-7.6 kg, p < .0001) and abdominal fat (-310 cm3, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Weight loss reduced OSA and improved sleepiness and cardiometabolic health. These improvements were not further enhanced by using CPAP. Results suggest weight loss should be the primary focus of treatment for patients with OSA and obesity.

Evaluating possible 'next day' impairment in insomnia patients administered an oral medicinal cannabis product by night: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Cannabis and its major constituents, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), are being widely used to treat sleep disturbances. However, THC can cause acute cognitive and psychomotor impairment and there are concerns that driving and workplace safety might be compromised the day after evening use. Here, we examined possible 'next day' impairment following evening administration of a typical medicinal cannabis oil in adults with insomnia disorder, compared to matched placebo. This paper describes the secondary outcomes of a larger study investigating the effects of THC/CBD on insomnia disorder. Twenty adults [16 female; mean (SD) age, 46.1 (8.6) y] with physician-diagnosed insomnia who infrequently use cannabis completed two 24 h in-laboratory visits involving acute oral administration of combined 10 mg THC and 200 mg CBD ('THC/CBD') or placebo in a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial design. Outcome measures included 'next day' (≥9 h post-treatment) performance on cognitive and psychomotor function tasks, simulated driving performance, subjective drug effects, and mood. We found no differences in 'next day' performance on 27 out of 28 tests of cognitive and psychomotor function and simulated driving performance relative to placebo. THC/CBD produced a small decrease (-1.4%, p=.016, d=-0.6) in accuracy on the Stroop-Colour Task (easy/congruent) but not the Stroop-Word Task (hard/incongruent). THC/CBD also produced a small increase (+8.6, p=.042, d=0.3) in self-ratings of Sedated at 10 h post-treatment, but with no accompanying changes in subjective ratings of Alert or Sleepy (p's>0.05). In conclusion, we found a lack of notable 'next day' impairment to cognitive and psychomotor function and simulated driving performance following evening use of 10 mg oral THC, in combination with 200 mg CBD, in an insomnia population who infrequently use cannabis.

Validation of self-applied unattended polysomnography using Somte V2 PSG (Somte) for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation.

PURPOSE: Polysomnography (PSG) may be completed in the home environment (unattended), and when self-applied, allow the collection of data with minimal healthcare worker intervention. Self-applied, unattended PSG in the home environment using Somte PSG V2 (Somte) has not been validated in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation. We undertook a study to evaluate the accuracy of Somte compared to attended PSG. The agreement between apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) and respiratory disturbance index (RDI) scores in Somte and PSG in early to mid-gestation were assessed. METHODS: Pregnant women (≤ 24 weeks gestation) were scheduled for PSG and Somte within a 7-day window, in any order. Somte were self-applied and completed in the home. Somte were scored blinded to PSG result. AHI was the primary outcome of interest, though an AHI ≥ 5 or RDI ≥ 5 on PSG was considered diagnostic of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA). AHI, RDI, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) was calculated and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were produced. Bland-Altman plots were used to determine agreement. Technical issues occurring during tests were explored. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants successfully completed both tests between March 2021 and January 2023. PSG were completed at around 14.1 weeks' gestation (IQR 13.4, 15.7). The time interval between Somte and PSG was a median of 4 days (IQR 2, 7 (range 1-12)). Five (20.8%) women had OSA on PSG at AHI ≥ 5 and 10 (41.6%) women had OSA on PSG at RDI ≥ 5. Somte and PSG did not differ in the measurement of AHI ((1.8, 1.6, p = 0.09) or RDI (3.3, 3.5), p = 0.73). At AHI ≥ 5, diagnostic test accuracy (area under the ROC curve) of Somte was 0.94, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 94.7%, PPV and NPV were 80.0% and 94.7% respectively. At RDI ≥ 5, diagnostic test accuracy (area under the ROC curve) was 0.95, sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 93.0% and PPV and NPV were 85.7% and 76.4% respectively. The confidence limits of Bland-Altman plots were 6.37 to - 8.89 at cut off AHI ≥ 5 and 8.89 to - 10.43 at cut off RDI ≥ 5. Somte failed to start in four tests. Technical issues were reported in both Somte (n = 13, 54.2%) and PSG (n = 6, 25.0%). CONCLUSION: Self-applied, unattended Somte may provide an acceptable substitute to attended PSG in the identification of OSA in pregnant women in early to mid-gestation in this small sample but may fail to detect cases of OSA, particularly when using RDI as the diagnostic marker.

Validation of the Apnealink Air for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in pregnant women in early-mid gestation.

PURPOSE: The detection of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in pregnant women in early-mid gestation is logistically difficult. Accurate alternates to polysomnography (PSG) in early pregnancy are not well identified. We compared the agreement between Apnealink Air (AL) and existing screening questionnaires to PSG in pregnant women ≤ 24-week gestation. METHODS: Pregnant women (≤ 24-week gestation) underwent AL at home plus attended PSG in any order, completed within 7 days where practicable. AL was manually scored (AL(M)) and automatically scored (AL(A)). An apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 was considered diagnostic of OSA and an AHI ≥ 15 considered at least moderate OSA. Diagnostic analysis was undertaken (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)) by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and an area under the curve (AUC) (95% CI). Bland-Altman plots were used to plot agreement. Screening questionnaires (Epworth sleepiness score (ESS), STOP-BANG, calculated pregnancy-specific screening tool) were compared to PSG. RESULTS: A total of 49 participants successfully completed both tests at around 14-weeks gestation (IQR 12.9, 17.1). The time interval between AL and PSG was a median of 2 days (IQR 1, 5 (range 1-11)). A total of 14 (29%) participants had OSA. The median AHI of AL(A) (3.1(IQR 0.85,4.6)) and AL(M) (IQR2.4(0.65,4.8)) did not differ from PSG (1.7(IQR1.0,6.1)). AL(A) and AL(M) compared to PSG demonstrated diagnostic test accuracy (area under curve (ROC)) of 0.94(95% CI 0.87-1.0) and 0.92(95% CI 0.85-1.0) respectively. Apnealink Air outperformed screening questionnaires tested. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that Apnealink may provide a substitute to attended PSG identification of OSA in pregnant women in early-mid gestation using both manual and auto-scoring methods.

REducing Sleep Apnoea for the PrEvention of Dementia (REShAPED): Protocol for a multi-site feasibility randomised controlled trial.

There is accumulating evidence that has linked OSA with increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Here we present the protocol for an Australian, multi-site randomised controlled, parallel open-label trial which will evaluate the feasibility for a full-scale trial investigating the effects of treating OSA on cognitive decline in older adults at risk of dementia within memory clinic settings. We will randomise 180 older adults to either the treatment intervention group or control group for 2 years. Inclusion criteria include: 50-85 years; mild-severe OSA (defined average ODI ≥ 10 with 3% oxygen desaturation determined by wrist oximetry over two nights); and subjective cognitive complaints or mild cognitive impairment. The treatment intervention arm aims to achieve an optimal treatment response based on reducing hypoxic burden with either CPAP, mandibular advancement splint, positional therapy, or oxygen therapy. Furthermore, participants will receive up to 8 sessions which involve motivational interviewing, collaborative goal setting, and behavioural sleep management. The control arm will not receive OSA treatment as part of this trial, however there will be no OSA treatment restrictions, and any treatment will be documented. Primary outcomes are 1) acceptability based upon willingness of participants to be randomised; 2) alleviating hypoxic burden by reducing OSA severity; 3) tolerability of the trial burden based upon collection of outcomes over the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes include safety and cognitive function. Outcomes will be collected at 0, 6 and 24-months. This feasibility study aims to will provide the basis for a larger longer-term trial of dementia prevention.

Does obstructive sleep apnea increase the risk of cancer and cancer mortality in combined community-based cohorts?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been linked to cancer in several clinical and community-based cohorts. The effect in community-based studies free of clinical referral bias needs to be replicated. In this observational prospective cohort study, we pooled data from three community-based prospective cohorts (Uppsala Sleep and Health in Men cohort [UMEN]; Sleep and health in women [SHE]; Men Androgen Inflammation Lifestyle Environment and Stress Cohort [MAILES]; nTotal = 1467). All cohorts had objective data on obstructive sleep apnea and registry linkage data on cancer and cancer mortality. Analyses for different obstructive sleep apnea measures (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], oxygen desaturation index [ODI], and minimal saturation) as risk factors for cancer incidence (all cancers) were performed using Cox proportional hazards models (follow-up 5-16 years). We did not find an overall increased risk of cancer after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI (HRAHI [95% CI] = 1.00 [0.98; 1.01] and HRODI [95% CI] = 0.99 [0.97; 1.01]). Stratifying by daytime sleepiness did not influence the association. Cancer mortality was not significantly associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Taken together, we did not observe an overall increased risk of cancer or cancer mortality in relation to obstructive sleep apnea, however, our confidence limits remain wide for important diagnostic categories of sleep apnea severity. The relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and cancer needs further investigation in a comprehensive multi-cohort approach with greater statistical precision. For future studies we may need to find and then combine every community-based cohort study that can provide a definitive answer to the question on the risk of cancer from obstructive sleep apnea in the general population.

Does daily energy and macronutrient intake differ between work and non-workdays in shift workers? A mixed methods study.

Shift workers are at increased risk of obesity and metabolic diseases, but their eating patterns on work and non-workdays are understudied. We aimed to examine whether energy intake and macronutrient intake of day and night shift nurses were different during work and non-workdays. We used a mixed-methods approach to study food intake of shift working nurses from two hospitals during day and night shifts. Participants completed baseline questionnaires about eating behaviour, sleep, chronotype, mood and shift work disorder. Participants then completed a 4-d food diary which included a non-workday prior to the first shift, the first and last shift (either day or night) and the following non-workday. After completion of the food diaries, we used semi-structured interviews to explore the qualitative aspects of eating behaviours. Seventy-nine shift-working nurses participated in the study. Daily energy intake was not significantly different on work and non-workdays in day or night shift workers (p > 0.05). Whilst macronutrient consumption was also not different between day and night shift workers (p > 0.05), sugar intake was higher in day compared to night shift workers (p = 0.02) on the non-workday prior to the first workday. In qualitative interviews, participants reported their eating to be different on day and night shifts as well as work and non-workdays. Eating behaviour in day and night shift workers was highly influenced by food availability, convenience, peers, and family members. Nurses qualitatively report that night and day shifts result in them eating differently despite no statistically discernible difference in energy intake.

Cannabinol (CBN; 30 and 300 mg) effects on sleep and next-day function in insomnia disorder ('CUPID' study): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, three-arm, proof-of-concept trial.

OBJECTIVE: Insomnia is the most prevalent sleep disorder, with few effective pharmacotherapies. Anecdotal reports and recent preclinical research suggest that cannabinol (CBN), a constituent of Cannabis sativa derived from delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, could be an effective treatment. Despite this, the isolated effects of CBN on sleep have yet to be systematically studied in humans. METHODS: The present protocol paper describes a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, three-arm, cross-over, proof-of-concept study which investigates the effects of CBN on sleep and next-day function in 20 participants with clinician-diagnosed insomnia disorder and an Insomnia Severity Index Score ≥15. Participants receive a single fixed oral liquid dose of 30 mg CBN, 300 mg CBN and matched placebo, in random order on three treatment nights; each separated by a 2-week wash-out period. Participants undergo overnight sleep assessment using in-laboratory polysomnography and next-day neurobehavioural function tests. The primary outcome is wake after sleep onset minutes. Secondary outcomes include changes to traditional sleep staging, sleep-onset latency and absolute spectral power during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Tertiary outcomes include changes to sleep spindles during NREM sleep, arousal indices, absolute spectral power during REM sleep and subjective sleep quality. Safety-related and exploratory outcomes include changes to next-day simulated driving performance, subjective mood and drug effects, postural sway, alertness and reaction time, overnight memory consolidation, pre and post-sleep subjective and objective sleepiness; and plasma, urinary, and salivary cannabinoid concentrations. The study will provide novel preliminary data on CBN efficacy and safety in insomnia disorder, which will inform larger clinical trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Human Research Ethics Committee approval has been granted by Bellberry (2021-08-907). Study findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05344170.

Risk of permanent social security benefits and overview of work participation among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: In this nationwide study, we used Danish population registries to estimate the excess risk of receiving permanent social security benefits for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to track their labour force participation. METHODS: We identified all Danish citizens receiving a diagnosis of OSA between 1995 and 2015. As a reference cohort, we randomly selected 10 citizens for each patient, matched by sex and birth year. Using the Fine and Gray competing risk regression, we estimated the cumulative incidences of receiving permanent social security benefits. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the risk of receiving permanent social security benefits in patients with OSA compared to the reference cohort. The Danish Rational Economic Agents' Model (DREAM) database was used to identify the labour market status prior to diagnosis, at time of diagnosis, and after diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 48,168 patients with OSA. A total of 12,413 (25.8%) patients with OSA had received permanent social security benefits, compared with 75,812 (15.7%) individuals in the reference cohort. Patients with OSA had a significantly increased risk of receiving permanent social security benefits when compared with the reference cohort (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.88-2.02; and subhazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.85-1.98). Work participation was lower for OSA patients compared to references at all time-points. CONCLUSION: Patients with OSA have a moderately increased risk of receiving permanent social security benefits in Denmark after controlling for available confounders.

The Health Effects of 72 Hours of Simulated Wind Turbine Infrasound: A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Study in Noise-Sensitive, Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: Large electricity-generating wind turbines emit both audible sound and inaudible infrasound at very low frequencies that are outside of the normal human range of hearing. Sufferers of wind turbine syndrome (WTS) have attributed their ill-health and particularly their sleep disturbance to the signature pattern of infrasound. Critics have argued that these symptoms are psychological in origin and are attributable to nocebo effects. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the effects of 72 h of infrasound (1.6-20 Hz at a sound level of ∼90 dB pk re 20µPa, simulating a wind turbine infrasound signature) exposure on human physiology, particularly sleep. METHODS: We conducted a randomized double-blind triple-arm crossover laboratory-based study of 72 h exposure with a >10-d washout conducted in a noise-insulated sleep laboratory in the style of a studio apartment. The exposures were infrasound (∼90 dB pk), sham infrasound (same speakers not generating infrasound), and traffic noise exposure [active control; at a sound pressure level of 40-50 dB LAeq,night and 70 dB LAFmax transient maxima, night (2200 to 0700 hours)]. The following physiological and psychological measures and systems were tested for their sensitivity to infrasound: wake after sleep onset (WASO; primary outcome) and other measures of sleep physiology, wake electroencephalography, WTS symptoms, cardiovascular physiology, and neurobehavioral performance. RESULTS: We randomized 37 noise-sensitive but otherwise healthy adults (18-72 years of age; 51% female) into the study before a COVID19-related public health order forced the study to close. WASO was not affected by infrasound compared with sham infrasound (-1.36 min; 95% CI: -6.60, 3.88, p=0.60) but was worsened by the active control traffic exposure compared with sham by 6.07 min (95% CI: 0.75, 11.39, p=0.02). Infrasound did not worsen any subjective or objective measures used. DISCUSSION: Our findings did not support the idea that infrasound causes WTS. High level, but inaudible, infrasound did not appear to perturb any physiological or psychological measure tested in these study participants. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10757.

How many hours do you sleep? A comparison of subjective and objective sleep duration measures in a sample of insomnia patients and good sleepers.

Our objective was to assess the agreement and linear relationships amongst multiple measures of sleep duration in a sample of patients with insomnia disorder and good sleeper controls. We retrospectively analysed data from 123 patients with insomnia disorder and 123 age- and gender-matched good sleeper controls who completed a simple subjective habitual sleep duration question (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), a sleep diary (5-14 days), 2 nights of polysomnography, and two corresponding morning subjective estimates of sleep duration. Descriptive statistics, linear regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots were used to describe the relationship and (dis)agreement between sleep duration measures. Relationships between polysomnography and the simple question as well as between polysomnography and sleep diary were weak to non-existent. Subjective measures and polysomnography did not agree. Sleep duration measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index or sleep diary was about 2 hr above or up to 4 hr below polysomnography-measured sleep duration. Patients with insomnia disorder, on average, reported shorter sleep duration compared with polysomnography, while good sleeper controls, on average, reported longer sleep duration compared with polysomnography. The results suggest that subjective and objective measures apparently capture different aspects of sleep, even when nominally addressing the same value (sleep duration). They disagree in both patients with insomnia disorder and good sleeper controls, but in different directions. Studies assessing sleep duration should take into account both the investigated population and the assessment method when interpreting results. Future studies should continue to investigate possible psychological and physiological correlates of sleep (mis)perception.

Armodafinil to reduce the sleepiness related side-effects of sleep restriction therapy being used to treat insomnia disorder: An open label clinical trial pilot study compared with historical controls.

Sleep restriction therapy (SRT) is an effective stand-alone behavioural intervention for insomnia disorder. However, its daytime side effects, particularly sleepiness, may be troubling for patients and/or may be a necessary part of the patient's treatment journey. This pilot trial aims to explore the potential benefit of armodafinil, a wakefulness promoter. Patients were treated with SRT with open label adjunctive armodafinil (150 mg/day). Thirty-three patients from previous studies that have undergone exactly the same SRT intervention acted as controls. The primary outcome measure was the insomnia severity index (ISI), and secondary outcomes were the Epworth sleepiness scale, sleep restriction adherence scale (SRAS), and safety from baseline through to 12 weeks. We recruited 25 patients into the trial. Data for the primary end point (ISI at 12 weeks) was available for 20 of the participants. The baseline insomnia severity index was 20.2 (SD 3.3) and decreased to 9.1 (SE 1.1), with no change, to 10.2 and 11.2 at weeks 6 and 12 respectively (all p > 0.05 compared with baseline). The insomnia severity index values for armodafinil patients were statistically inferior to historical controls at the primary time point of 12 weeks (11.2 vs. 6.7, p < 0.01). Sleep restriction therapy plus armodafinil treatment was associated with frequent minor side effects but was generally safe and acceptable to patients. Sleep restriction therapy was associated with a robust clinical response in the insomnia severity index values for insomnia patients. Based upon historical control data, armodafinil does not appear to have beneficial adjunctive effects in addition to sleep restriction therapy alone.

The Effect of Light Therapy on Electroencephalographic Sleep in Sleep and Circadian Rhythm Disorders: A Scoping Review.

Light therapy is used to treat sleep and circadian rhythm disorders, yet there are limited studies on whether light therapy impacts electroencephalographic (EEG) activity during sleep. Therefore, we aimed to provide an overview of research studies that examined the effects of light therapy on sleep macro- and micro-architecture in populations with sleep and circadian rhythm disorders. We searched for randomized controlled trials that used light therapy and included EEG sleep measures using MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Five articles met the inclusion criteria of patients with either insomnia or delayed sleep−wake phase disorder (DSWPD). These trials reported sleep macro-architecture outcomes using EEG or polysomnography. Three insomnia trials showed no effect of the timing or intensity of light therapy on total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, sleep efficiency and sleep stage duration compared to controls. Only one insomnia trial reported significantly higher sleep efficiency after evening light therapy (>4000 lx between 21:00−23:00 h) compared with afternoon light therapy (>4000 lx between 15:00−17:00 h). In the only DSWPD trial, six multiple sleep latency tests were conducted across the day (09:00 and 19:00 h) and bright light (2500 lx) significantly lengthened sleep latency in the morning (09:00 and 11:00 h) compared to control light (300 lx). None of the five trials reported any sleep micro-architecture measures. Overall, there was limited research about the effect of light therapy on EEG sleep measures, and studies were confined to patients with insomnia and DSWPD only. More research is needed to better understand whether lighting interventions in clinical populations affect sleep macro- and micro-architecture and objective sleep timing and quality.

Analyzing Unnecessary Imaging for Low Back Pain in Nebraska from a Statewide Health Information Exchange.

Excessive amounts of resources in healthcare are wasted due to duplicated or unnecessary health screenings, especially in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP). Research shows that two-thirds of people will present with LBP at some point throughout their lifetime, but 20-50% of high-tech imaging procedures fail to provide information that improves the patient's condition, representing unnecessary services. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existence of unnecessary imaging for low back pain throughout healthcare systems in Nebraska based on what was documented in the electronic health record. This study was a retrospective electronic health record analysis of a limited data set focused on procedures related to imaging for LBP extracted from Nebraska Health Information Exchange (HIE) managed by CyncHealth. The sample included 937 patient records with a diagnosis of LBP who received imaging in the state of Nebraska and whose health record was recorded in the Nebraska HIE. To determine necessity, records were categorized in three areas including necessary imaging, likely wasteful imaging, or wasteful imaging based on the criteria from the "First, Do No Harm" study conducted by the Washington Health Alliance. Results revealed a total of 51% of low back pain imaging considered wasteful, 35% likely wasteful, and 14% necessary. Based on these results, further research is warranted to determine specific demographics related to necessary, likely wasteful, and wasteful imaging and the purpose for performing these expensive imaging procedures.