Longitudinal evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a large tertiary hospital setting.

Objective: This study sought to assess the impact of a novel electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) system on patient outcomes. Methods: The e-A&F intervention was implemented in a tertiary hospital and involved near real-time feedback via web-based dashboards. We used a segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series. We modelled the pre-post change in outcomes for the (1) announcement of this priority list, and (2) implementation of the e-A&F intervention to have affected patient outcomes. Results: Across the study period there were 222,792 episodes of inpatient care, of which 13,904 episodes were found to contain one or more HACs, a risk of 6.24%. From the point of the first intervention until the end of the study the overall risk of a HAC reduced from 8.57% to 4.12% - a 51.93% reduction. Of this reduction the proportion attributed to each of these interventions was found to be 29.99% for the announcement of the priority list and 21.93% for the implementation of the e-A&F intervention. Discussion: Our findings lend evidence to a mechanism that the announcement of a measurement framework, at a national level, can lead to local strategies, such as e-A&F, that lead to significant continued improvements over time.

An evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a tertiary hospital setting: A study protocol.

An electronic audit and feedback (e-A&F) system was developed to support healthcare providers' awareness of their own performance, improve delivery of care and ultimately the safety of patients while in hospital. The point-of-care e-A&F system provides healthcare providers, from a 600-bed tertiary hospital in Western Australia, with near real-time feedback via web-based dashboards. The aim of this evaluation is to determine the implications of e-A&F across multiple dimensions and domains of care in a tertiary hospital setting. The study also aims to address the paucity in the literature by validating hypothesised design and implementation mechanisms on its effectiveness. Key datasets to be examined include those related to patient outcomes, staff behaviour and costs. Quantitative methods, such as interrupted time series analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis, amongst other methods, will be employed to achieve these aims.

The Unmet Need for Intrathecal Drug Delivery Pumps for the Treatment of Cancer Pain in England: An Assessment of the Hospital Episode Statistics Database.

OBJECTIVES: Intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) devices have been shown to be a clinically effective and cost-effective option for the management of cancer pain and recommended for use in England. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of the 2015 NHS England Clinical Commissioning Policy on the uptake of ITDD pumps for the management of cancer pain or if there is an ongoing unmet need for this intervention in England. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) were obtained for all patients undergoing ITDD for the management of cancer pain between 2014 and January 2020. In addition, HES were utilized to estimate the number of patients with cancer potentially eligible for ITDD pump during the same period. RESULTS: The number of patients with cancer and those potentially suitable to receive an ITDD for the management of cancer pain have increased year on year since 2014. This increase has not been matched by an uptake in the provision of ITDD. Conservative estimates suggest that at least 8000 people with cancer pain would be eligible for ITDD; 458 patients received an intervention for pain management between April 2018 and March 2019 and only 30 ITDD pumps were implanted in that same period. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a substantial gap between the need and provision of ITDD for patients with refractory cancer pain in England despite the recommendation for the use of ITDD for this patient population. In addition, we present suggestions for improvement of access to and provision of ITDD in England.

Challenges in implementing HIV load testing in South Africa.

The South African antiretroviral treatment guidelines recommend the use of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) load testing for patient monitoring and, in particular, to assist in switching to second-line treatment regimens. There are significant challenges to implementing HIV load testing on the scale that is required in South Africa. To put this in context, approximately 560,000 HIV-infected individuals are receiving antiretroviral therapy, and program recommendations include viral load testing twice per year. Currently, a 3-tiered laboratory infrastructure exists with tertiary facilities and, to some extent, secondary laboratories able to implement quantitative HIV nucleic acid testing. Challenges include high sample volumes, transportation logistics from remote sites, costs, phlebotomy in children, a national skills shortage, and sample throughput of technology platforms. Several approaches are thus being explored simultaneously: (1) the feasibility of establishing higher throughput and more automated central laboratories; (2) improvement of current sample collection, transportation, and storage techniques; (3) alternative viral load technologies, including flow-based marker screening approaches to reduce testing volumes, and (4) point-of-care viral load testing strategies for clinics. The development of appropriate solutions for each laboratory tier in South Africa will require close collaboration between researchers in the field and partners in industry.