Is obesity more likely among children sharing a household with an older child with obesity? Cross-sectional study of linked National Child Measurement Programme data and electronic health records.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We identified household members from electronic health records linked to National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP) data to estimate the likelihood of obesity among children living with an older child with obesity. METHODS: We included 126 829 NCMP participants in four London boroughs and assigned households from encrypted Unique Property Reference Numbers for 115 466 (91.0%). We categorised the ethnic-adjusted body mass index of the youngest and oldest household children (underweight/healthy weight <91st, ≥91st overweight <98th, obesity ≥98th centile) and estimated adjusted ORs and 95% CIs of obesity in the youngest child by the oldest child's weight status, adjusting for number of household children (2, 3 or ≥4), youngest child's sex, ethnicity and school year of NCMP participation. RESULTS: We identified 19 702 households shared by two or more NCMP participants (% male; median age, range (years)-youngest children: 51.2%; 5.2, 4.1-11.8; oldest children: 50.6%; 10.6, 4.1-11.8). One-third of youngest children with obesity shared a household with another child with obesity (33.2%; 95% CI: 31.2, 35.2), compared with 9.2% (8.8, 9.7) of youngest children with a healthy weight. Youngest children living with an older child considered overweight (OR: 2.33; 95% CI: 2.06, 2.64) or obese (4.59; 4.10, 5.14) were more likely to be living with obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying children sharing households by linking primary care and school records provides novel insights into the shared weight status of children sharing a household. Qualitative research is needed to understand how food practices vary by household characteristics to increase understanding of how the home environment influences childhood obesity.

Implementation of a quality improvement programme using the Active Patient Link call and recall system to improve timeliness and equity of childhood vaccinations: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Call and recall systems provide actionable intelligence to improve equity and timeliness of childhood vaccinations, which have been disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic. We will evaluate the effectiveness, fidelity and sustainability of a data-enabled quality improvement programme delivered in primary care using an Active Patient Link Immunisation (APL-Imms) call and recall system to improve timeliness and equity of uptake in a multiethnic disadvantaged urban population. We will use qualitative methods to evaluate programme delivery, focusing on uptake and use, implementation barriers and service improvements for clinical and non-clinical primary care staff, its fidelity and sustainability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a mixed-methods observational study in 284 general practices in north east London (NEL). The target population will be preschool-aged children eligible to receive diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTaP) or measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccinations and registered with an NEL general practice. The intervention comprises an in-practice call and recall tool, facilitation and training, and financial incentives. The quantitative evaluation will include interrupted time Series analyses and Slope Index of Inequality. The primary outcomes will be the proportion of children receiving at least one dose of a DTaP-containing or MMR vaccination defined, respectively, as administered between age 6 weeks and 6 months or between 12 and 18 months of age. The qualitative evaluation will involve a 'Think Aloud' method and semistructured interviews of stakeholders to assess impact, fidelity and sustainability of the APL-Imms tool, and fidelity of the implementation by facilitators. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research team has been granted permission from data controllers in participating practices to use deidentified data for audit purposes. As findings will be specific to the local context, research ethics approval is not required. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and to stakeholders, including parents, health providers and commissioners.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on timeliness and equity of measles, mumps and rubella vaccinations in North East London: a longitudinal study using electronic health records.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the timeliness of, and geographical and sociodemographic inequalities in, receipt of first measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination. DESIGN: Longitudinal study using primary care electronic health records. SETTING: 285 general practices in North East London. PARTICIPANTS: Children born between 23 August 2017 and 22 September 2018 (pre-pandemic cohort) or between 23 March 2019 and 1 May 2020 (pandemic cohort). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Receipt of timely MMR vaccination between 12 and 18 months of age. METHODS: We used logistic regression to estimate the ORs (95% CIs) of receipt of a timely vaccination adjusting for sex, deprivation, ethnic background and Clinical Commissioning Group. We plotted choropleth maps of the proportion receiving timely vaccinations. RESULTS: Timely MMR receipt fell by 4.0% (95% CI: 3.4% to 4.6%) from 79.2% (78.8% to 79.6%) to 75.2% (74.7% to 75.7%) in the pre-pandemic (n=33 226; 51.3% boys) and pandemic (n=32 446; 51.4%) cohorts, respectively. After adjustment, timely vaccination was less likely in the pandemic cohort (0.79; 0.76 to 0.82), children from black (0.70; 0.65 to 0.76), mixed/other (0.77; 0.72 to 0.82) or with missing (0.77; 0.74 to 0.81) ethnic background, and more likely in girls (1.07; 1.03 to 1.11) and those from South Asian backgrounds (1.39; 1.30 to 1.48). Children living in the least deprived areas were more likely to receive a timely MMR (2.09; 1.78 to 2.46) but there was no interaction between cohorts and deprivation (Wald statistic: 3.44; p=0.49). The proportion of neighbourhoods where less than 60% of children received timely vaccination increased from 7.5% to 12.7% during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant fall in timely MMR receipt and increased geographical clustering of measles susceptibility in an area of historically low and inequitable MMR coverage. Immediate action is needed to avert measles outbreaks and support primary care to deliver timely and equitable vaccinations.

Interaction of cationic protoberberine alkaloids with human serum albumin. No spectroscopic evidence on binding to Sudlow's site 1.

Physicochemical studies on drug interactions with human serum albumin (HSA) are relevant for elucidation, at the molecular level, of the processes occurring in vivo. In this work using optical spectroscopic methods (fluorescence, absorption, circular dichroism), we have investigated aqueous HSA solutions containing pharmaceutically important isoquinoline alkaloids, berberine and palmatine. The primary objective was to verify whether the two compounds are located in the subdomain IIA of the secondary HSA structure as reported in literature. We prove that the excited state of Trp214 residue is not quenched by the alkaloids; all observed changes in fluorescence spectra are due to inner filter effects. Furthermore, differential absorption spectra indicate that the ligands remain in a waterlike microenvironment. We infer that bound alkaloid molecules are located at the protein/water interface. Yet, such binding mode can induce some unfolding of the HSA molecule detectable in the far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectra. We have also performed, for the first time, pulse radiolysis studies of hydrated electron scavenging in the HSA/alkaloid systems and have measured steady-state absorption spectra of irradiated samples. The results reveal that neither berberine nor palmatine is effectively protected by the protein against one-electron reduction, which is consistent with the aforementioned conclusion.