ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Suspicion of allergic drug reaction can cause important disturbances in the patient's life. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated in a prospective multicenter study the quality of life of patients who suffered a possible allergic drug reaction, and analyzed the effect of a drug allergy evaluation. METHODS: Patients (>18 years old) answered the specific questionnaire twice: before the drug allergy evaluation, and 1 month after it was completed. Statistics were performed using STATA. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients (240, 66.6% female; mean age, 45.4 years; standard deviation [SD], 15.6 years) completed the first questionnaire. After the evaluation, 150 of 346 patients (43.4%) were diagnosed as allergic to the drug (115 of 150 immediate; 35 of 150 delayed) and 196 of 346 patients (56.6%) as nonallergic. The mean value of the first questionnaire was 32.14 (SD, 11.84); patients with anaphylaxis, nonanaphylactic immediate reaction, with more than 1 drug reaction, or a chronic osteoarticular disease, had a statistically significant higher score in Q0 (worse quality of life). After the allergy study, the mean of the second questionnaire was 27.27 (SD, 9.96), showing a global improvement (P < .001). No statistically significant difference was found between drug allergic and non-drug allergic patients (P = .340); however, being >40 years old (P = .030), having a chronic osteoarticular disease (P = .003) and having more than 1 reaction to drugs (P < .001) were associated with a statistically significant worse quality of life after the evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Having suffered anaphylaxis, more than 1 reported drug allergy or presenting a musculoskeletal disease are factors that worsen the quality of life. Quality of life improved significantly after completing a drug allergy evaluation.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/psychology , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoke is a widely recognized environmental pollutant and is a major public health hazard worldwide. Although environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has a clear link with many conditions, including asthma, ear infections, and sinus cancer, evidence related to aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) requires further investigation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether active smoke or ETS exposures are associated with an increased risk of developing AERD. METHODS: A total of 260 patients with AERD were enrolled in a case-control study with their respective asymptomatic spouses serving as matched controls. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of AERD with active smoking and ETS, adjusted for age, sex, and location of childhood residence. RESULTS: The AERD case patients were more likely to have ever smoked actively when compared with controls (odds ratio [OR], 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.28). A significant association (OR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.22-5.39) was found between childhood ETS exposure and AERD. If a patient was exposed to ETS during both childhood and adulthood, results showed an OR of 5.09 for developing AERD (95% CI, 2.75-9.43). However, no statistically significant association between AERD and ETS only during adulthood was found (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.75-3.40), suggesting that the combined effect of childhood and adulthood ETS may be augmented by the prior childhood exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Active smoking and childhood ETS exposure are associated with increased odds of developing AERD. In particular, combined childhood and adulthood exposure had major effects. This study suggests that ETS is at least one contributor to the syndrome of AERD.
Subject(s)
Asthma, Aspirin-Induced/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aspirin/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
In clinical practice, physicians may find it difficult to recognize the differences between allergic and pseudo-allergic reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to manage each type of reaction. This paper reviews all the information presently available in order to clarify main problems related to NSAID reactions and to highlight key strategies to handle these reactions.
