SIMBOSPROST: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and osteoporosis in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy: A multicentre, cross-sectional study.

AIM: To assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and osteoporosis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical radiotherapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the prevalence of MetS is estimated to range from 20% to 25% of the adult population. However, prevalence rates are much higher in PCa patients (pts) who undergo ADT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicentre cross-sectional study of 270 pts in Spain with PCa. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the duration of ADT (6, 12-18, ≥24 months) and compared to a control group without ADT. MetS was defined according to NCEP ATP III criteria. Osteoporosis was assessed by DEXA. RESULTS: A total of 270 pts, treated from November 2011 to October 2012, were included. Of these, 122 pts (47%) fulfilled the criteria for MetS. The median age of this group was significantly higher (71.3 vs. 69.38 years, p = 0.028). MetS prevalence was 50% in the control group. In pts who received ADT, prevalence was 44.8% after 6 months of ADT, 45.3% after 12-18 months, and 50% after ≥24 months (pns). Most pts (168/270; 62%) underwent DEXA. Of those tested, 78 (46.4%) had osteopenia and only 11 (6.5%) had osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MetS in pts with PCa treated with radical RT was higher (47%) than in the general population. However, there were no significant differences in the duration of ADT administration. The prevalence of osteoporosis was low. These findings suggest that the prevalence of MetS in PCa patients may be higher than previously reported.

[Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy as preventive treatment for biochemical recurrence]. / Radioterapia adyuvante después de prostatectomía radical como tratamiento preventivo de la recidiva bioquímica.

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has proven to be more effective in patients at high risk of relapse than salvage RT when this relapse occurs. To optimize its use we must identify the subset of patients at greater risk of residual microscopic disease after surgery, since in them the likelihood of 5-10 year biochemical failure can reach 60%. There are many studies on the subject in which these factors are identified, which in general are: presence of positive margins and capsular or seminal vesicle involvement (T3a-b). Of these, it seems that the presence of positive margins is the most powerful predictor of relapse. With regard to radiotherapy, there is variability in the dose to give and volume treated. In general, the dose in most series is ≥ 60 Gy, reaching some authors up to 70 Gy. As to the association or not hormone therapy (HT) and adjuvant radiotherapy, it is a subject of debate and so far no results of studies demonstrate a sufficient benefit, so it should be individualized, weighing potential benefits in high risk patients against side effects.