Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 21551, 2020 12 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33299019

ABSTRACT

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) prevalence is believed to be around 1% worldwide, although it varies considerably among different populations. The aim of EPISER2016 study was to estimate the prevalence of RA in the general adult population in Spain. We designed a population-based cross-sectional study. A national survey was conducted between November 2016 and October 2017 involving a probabilistic sample from the general population aged 20 years or older. Subjects were randomly selected for phone screening using a computer-assisted telephone interviewer system. Positive RA screening results were evaluated by a rheumatologist. Cases fulfilled the 1987 ACR and/or the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria; previous diagnosis established by a rheumatologist and clearly identified in medical records were also accepted regardless of the criteria used. Prevalence estimates with 95% CI were calculated taking into account the design of the sample (weighting based on age, sex, and geographic origin using as a reference the distribution of the population in Spain). 4916 subjects participated in the study and 39 RA cases were confirmed. RA estimated prevalence was 0.82% (95% CI 0.59-1.15). Mean age of RA cases was 60.48 (14.85) years, they were more frequently women (61.5%), from urban areas (74.4%), non-smokers (43.6%), and with a high body mass index (53.8% with overweight). Extrapolating to the population in Spain (approximately 37 million are ≥ 20 years old), it was estimated that there were between 220,000 and 430,000 people aged 20 years or older with RA. No undiagnosed cases were detected, which could be related to the establishment of early arthritis clinics around the country, increasing the rates of diagnosis during early phases of RA.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(5): 514-517, sept.-oct. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198875

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia de consultas médicas por problemas osteoarticulares en población general adulta en España y su asociación con variables sociodemográficas, antropométricas y de hábitos de vida. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal de base poblacional. Muestra de 4916 sujetos de 20 o más años de edad. Se realizó un cuestionario telefónico que incluía una pregunta sobre consulta médica por problemas osteoarticulares. Para la estimación de la prevalencia y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC95%) se calcularon los pesos en función de la probabilidad de selección en cada una de las etapas del muestreo. RESULTADOS: El 28,9% (IC95%: 27,6-30,2) de las personas encuestadas refirieron haber consultado a algún médico por problemas osteoarticulares en el último año. Se ha observado una asociación con la edad, el sexo, el nivel de estudios y el índice de masa corporal


OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of medical visits due to osteoarticular problems by the adult general population in Spain and its association with sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables. METHOD: Cross-sectional population-based study. Sample with 4916 subjects aged 20 years and over. A telephone questionnaire, with a question about medical visits due to osteoarticular problems, was used. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI), weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. RESULTS: 28.9% (95%CI: 27.6-30.2) of the people reported having consulted a doctor in the last year because of osteoarticular problems. We observed an association with age, sex, level of education, and body mass index


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Joint Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Bone Diseases/epidemiology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Spain/epidemiology
3.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 38 Suppl 123(1): 47-52, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928589

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of fibromyalgia (FM) differs depending on the population studied. The main objective of the EPISER2016 study was to estimate the prevalence of FM in adults in Spain. The secondary objective was to evaluate the association with sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics and smoking. METHODS: This is a population-based cross-sectional multicentre study. The random selection was based on multistage stratified cluster sampling. The final sample comprised 4916 persons aged ≥20 years. Participants were contacted by telephone for completion of a screening survey. Investigating rheumatologists evaluated positive results (review of medical records and/or telephone interview, with medical visit if needed) to confirm the diagnosis. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were calculated, taking into account the sample design. Weighing was applied based on age, sex, and geographic origin. Predictive models were constructed to analyse which sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables in the call centre questionnaire were associated with the presence of FM. RESULTS: 602 subjects (12.25%) had a positive screening result for FM, of which 24 were missing (3.99%). A total of 141 cases of FM were recorded. The estimated prevalence was 2.45% (95% CI, 2.06-2.90). Female sex was the variable most associated with FM, with an odds ratio (OR) of 10.156 (95% CI, 5.068-20.352). Peak prevalence was at 60-69 years (p=0.009, OR=6.962). FM was 68% more frequent in obese individuals (OR, 1.689; 95% CI, 1.036-2.755). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of FM in adults in Spain barely changed between 2000 and 2016 and it is similar to that observed in Europe as a whole.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Obesity/complications , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
Gac Sanit ; 34(5): 514-517, 2020.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31558387

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of medical visits due to osteoarticular problems by the adult general population in Spain and its association with sociodemographic, anthropometric and lifestyle variables. METHOD: Cross-sectional population-based study. Sample with 4916 subjects aged 20 years and over. A telephone questionnaire, with a question about medical visits due to osteoarticular problems, was used. To estimate the prevalence and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI), weights were calculated according to the probability of selection in each of the sampling stages. RESULTS: 28.9% (95%CI: 27.6-30.2) of the people reported having consulted a doctor in the last year because of osteoarticular problems. We observed an association with age, sex, level of education, and body mass index.


Subject(s)
Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Body Mass Index , Humans , Prevalence , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 15(2): 90-96, mar.-abr. 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-184355

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Describir la metodología del estudio de prevalencia de las enfermedades reumáticas en la población adulta en España, EPISER 2016, así como sus fortalezas y limitaciones. El objetivo del proyecto es estimar la prevalencia de artritis reumatoide (AR), artropatía psoriásica (APs), espondilitis anquilosante (EA), lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES), síndrome de Sjögren (SS), artrosis (de rodilla, cadera, manos, columna cervical y lumbar), fibromialgia, gota y fractura osteoporótica clínica. Material y método: Estudio transversal multicéntrico de base poblacional en el que participan 45 municipios de las 17 comunidades autónomas. La población de referencia está compuesta por adultos de 20 o más años residentes en España. La recogida de información se llevará a cabo mediante encuesta telefónica empleando el sistema Computer Assisted Telephone Interview (CATI). Las sospechas diagnósticas y los diagnósticos autorreferidos serán estudiadas por reumatólogos del hospital de referencia de los municipios seleccionados. Análisis estadístico: se calcularán las prevalencias de enfermedades reumáticas mediante estimadores y sus IC del 95%. Se calcularán factores de ponderación en función de la probabilidad de selección en cada una de las etapas del muestreo. Se tendrá en cuenta la distribución de la población en España según datos del Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Conclusiones: Los cambios sociodemográficos y en hábitos de vida durante los últimos 16 años justifican la realización de EPISER 2016. El estudio ofrecerá datos actualizados de prevalencia en AR, EA, APs, LES, SS, artrosis, fibromialgia, gota y fractura osteoporótica clínica. Los resultados permitirán comparar los datos con estudios de otros países y con el EPISER 2000


Aims: To describe the methodology of the EPISER 2016 (study of the prevalence of rheumatic diseases in adult population in Spain), as well its strengths and limitations. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), osteoarthritis (knee, hip, hands, and cervical and lumbar spine), fibromyalgia, gout and clinical osteoporotic fracture. Material and method: Population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study, with the participation of 45 municipalities in the 17 Spanish autonomous communities. The reference population will consist of adults aged 20 years and over residing in Spain. A computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system will be used for data collection. Diagnostic suspicions and diagnoses received by the participants will be studied by rheumatologists in the referral hospitals in the selected municipalities. Statistical analysis: the prevalence of the rheumatic diseases will be calculated using estimators and their 95% confidence intervals. Weights will be calculated in each of the sampling stages in accordance with the probability of selection. The distribution of the population in Spain will be obtained from the Spanish Statistics Institute. Conclusions: Sociodemographic and lifestyle changes over the last 16 years justify EPISER 2016. This study will provide current data about the prevalences of RA, AS, PsA, SLE, SS, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, gout and clinical osteoporotic fracture. The results will allow comparisons with studies from other countries and EPISER 2000


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Gout/epidemiology , Joint Diseases/epidemiology , Sjogren's Syndrome/epidemiology , Fibromyalgia/epidemiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/epidemiology , Arthritis, Psoriatic/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods
6.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 15(2): 90-96, 2019.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28774657

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To describe the methodology of the EPISER 2016 (study of the prevalence of rheumatic diseases in adult population in Spain), as well its strengths and limitations. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), osteoarthritis (knee, hip, hands, and cervical and lumbar spine), fibromyalgia, gout and clinical osteoporotic fracture. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study, with the participation of 45 municipalities in the 17 Spanish autonomous communities. The reference population will consist of adults aged 20 years and over residing in Spain. A computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) system will be used for data collection. Diagnostic suspicions and diagnoses received by the participants will be studied by rheumatologists in the referral hospitals in the selected municipalities. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: the prevalence of the rheumatic diseases will be calculated using estimators and their 95% confidence intervals. Weights will be calculated in each of the sampling stages in accordance with the probability of selection. The distribution of the population in Spain will be obtained from the Spanish Statistics Institute. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic and lifestyle changes over the last 16 years justify EPISER 2016. This study will provide current data about the prevalences of RA, AS, PsA, SLE, SS, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, gout and clinical osteoporotic fracture. The results will allow comparisons with studies from other countries and EPISER 2000.


Subject(s)
Research Design , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Spain/epidemiology
7.
Curr Rheumatol Rep ; 12(6): 436-42, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20857242

ABSTRACT

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also called temporal arteritis, is a vasculitis that affects large and middle-sized blood vessels--with predisposition to the involvement of cranial arteries derived from the carotid artery--in individuals older than 50 years of age. Familial aggregation of GCA has been observed. Incidence of GCA is higher in white individuals than those of other ethnicities, particularly those of Scandinavian background. A temporal artery biopsy is the gold standard test for the diagnosis of GCA. Several imaging modalities, in particular ultrasonography, are useful in the diagnosis of GCA. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment in GCA. Alternative, steroid-sparing drugs, particularly methotrexate, should be considered in GCA patients with severe corticosteroid-related side effects and/or in those who require prolonged corticosteroid therapy due to relapses of the disease.


Subject(s)
Giant Cell Arteritis , Temporal Arteries/pathology , Biopsy , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Giant Cell Arteritis/epidemiology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Temporal Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
8.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 11(7): 1077-87, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20367535

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a relatively frequent condition in individuals older than 50 who originate from Western countries. Corticosteroids constitute the cornerstone therapy in the management of patients with PMR. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This review summarizes the current literature on clinical clues for the diagnosis of PMR, conditions mimicking PMR, relapses in the setting of PMR and the main therapeutic strategies. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: With this information, the reader receives an overview on the current available data on clinical diagnosis and treatment options in PMR. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: An initial dose of prednisone of 10-20 mg/day yields clinical improvement in the majority of patients with PMR. This is generally achieved within 7 days of the onset of this therapy. Conditions different from isolated PMR should be considered in atypical cases or when a good response to 20 mg/day of prednisone is not achieved. Relapses of PMR are not uncommon when the dose of prednisone is equal to or below than 5 mg/day. Methotrexate is the most commonly used corticosteroid sparing agent. Osteoporosis prophylaxis is also recommended.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Age Factors , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...