Seguimiento a largo plazo de los pacientes operados de cáncer de pulmón / Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgery (SECT) consensus document. Long-term follow-up for operated patients with lung cancer

El tratamiento más efectivo para el cáncer de pulmón es la resección pulmonar completa, si bien las recidivas llegan hasta el 10% y la aparición de segundos primarios, hasta el 6%. Será, por tanto, indispensable el seguimiento de estos pacientes para la detección y tratamiento precoces de estos eventos; sin embargo, no existe una definición de la forma, tiempo y cadencia de estos seguimientos. En el presente documento de consenso, tratamos de definirlos con base en la evidencia científica disponible. Se realiza una revisión crítica de la bibliografía (metaanálisis, revisiones sistemáticas, revisiones, recomendaciones de consenso de sociedades científicas, estudios controlados aleatorizados, estudios controlados no aleatorizados, estudios observacionales y estudios de series de casos) y comunicaciones a los principales congresos de oncología y cirugía torácica en castellano, inglés y francés. Se clasifican las evidencias halladas siguiendo el sistema GRADE. Queda definido, según la evidencia existente, que se debe realizar un seguimiento del paciente resecado por cáncer pulmonar, así como que este seguimiento debe ser estrecho durante los primeros años y con realización de TC (no siendo necesario el seguimiento con tomografía por emisión de positrones-tomografía computarizada [PET-TC], biomarcadores o broncoscopia). Se recomienda también en ese seguimiento el cese del hábito tabáquico (AU)

The most effective treatment for lung cancer is complete lung resection, although recurrences reach up to 10% and the appearance of second neoplasms, up to 6%. Therefore, the follow-up of these patients will be essential for the early detection and treatment of these events; however, there is no definition of the form, time and cadence of these follow-ups. In this consensus document, we try to define them based on the available scientific evidence. A critical review of the literature is carried out (meta-analysis, systematic reviews, reviews, consensus recommendations of scientific societies, randomized controlled studies, non-randomized controlled studies, observational studies and case series studies) and communications to the main congresses on oncology and thoracic surgery in Spanish, English and French. The evidences found are classified following the GRADE system. It is defined according to the existing evidence that the patient resected for lung cancer should be followed up, as well as that this follow-up should be close during the first years and with CT (not being necessary to follow up with PET-CT, biomarkers or bronchoscopy). Cessation of smoking is also recommended in this follow-up (AU)

Clinical significance of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related markers expression in the micrometastatic sentinel lymph node of NSCLC.

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic lymph node affectation is the main prognostic factor in localised lung cancer. However, the pathological study of lymph nodes reveals tumour relapse for 20% of patients after oncological curative surgery. Recently, EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) has been established as one of the main factors related to lymphatic dissemination and metastasis. This study evaluated the prognostic value of EMT-related gene expression in micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: The presence of genes CDH1, CDH2, VIM, TWIST1, SNAI1, SNAI2, ZEB1, and ZEB2 in mRNA was analysed in tumours and in the SLN of NSCLC patients for whom surgery was planned for treatment. The significant association between the expression level of EMT-related markers and patients' clinicopathological characteristics and relapse was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients, 56 (58.33%) presented molecular micrometastasis in SLN, which showed higher CDH1, CDH2, and VIM expressions than non-micrometastatic ones. An association linking a low CDH1/CDH2 ratio in SLN with molecular micrometastasis, adenocarcinoma, and non-smoking patients was found. The multivariate Cox regression analysis proved the prognostic accuracy of the CDH1/CDH2 ratio in SLN. CONCLUSIONS: The molecular EMT status of SLN could be used as an independent prognosis predictor in early stage NSLCL patients, and as a new tool to better stratify and predict patient outcomes.

Prognostic value of ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1 and SETDB1 in early stage of non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, 40 % of early-stage NSCLC patients relapse in the 2 years following resection, suggesting a mis-staging in this group of patients who are not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Although different biomarkers, such as ERCC1, RRM1 and BRCA1 have been found to present prognostic value in advanced NSCLC patients, in early-stage NSCLC patients its relevance remains unclear. Moreover, SETDB1 has been recently proposed as a bona fide oncogene in lung tumourigenesis and related with metastasis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the prognostic value of ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression levels in NSCLC patients at stage I. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ERCC1, RRM1, BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression at mRNA level was analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR in fresh-frozen tumor and normal adjacent lung tissue samples from 64 stage I NSCLC patients. Later, significant association between gene expression levels, clinicopathological characteristics and patient's disease-free survival was assessed. RESULTS: We did not find any statistically significant correlation between gene expression and gender, age, histological type or smoking status. Univariate followed by multivariate Cox analysis showed that higher levels of BRCA1 and SETDB1 expression were significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival in stage I NSCLC patients. CONCLUSION: Our study finds that ERCC1 and RRM1 are not independent prognostic factors of recurrence in stage I NSCLC patients. By contrast, BRCA1 and SETDB1 stand out as the most significant prognostic markers in this group of patients, appearing as promising tools to predict tumor recurrence in early-stage NSCLC patients.

Study of survival in patients with malignant lung lesions treated with radiofrequency

OBJECTIVE: To report on the survival of a series of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumours treated with radiofrequency (RF). Four years ago we published our preliminary experience with the use of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a period of 8 years we have treated 59 patients (by means of a total of 70 procedures) with primary or metastatic pulmonary neoplastic lesions, which fulfilled inclusion criteria to perform the technique. They were in all cases non-surgical lesions that had been either previously treated or not. The technique was performed in the radiology suite, under conscious analgo-sedation. We treated primary pulmonary lesions, neoplastic recurrences, or metastases with curative or palliative intention (pain management). RESULTS: Current global survival rate is 19 patients (32 %) with a mean of 26.61 ± 3.17 months (range: 20.38 ± 32.83) and a median of 16.00 ± 3.57 (range: 8.99-23.00). If we establish the difference between primary and metastatic tumours, mean survival is 27.62 ± 4.12 months in primary tumours (median: 16.00) vs. 24.65 ± 4.47 months in metastatic tumours (median: 16.00). When we studied the survival in those cases with a curative intent, mean survival in primary tumours was 30.97 ± 4.57 months (median: 21.00) vs. 25.14 ± 4.68 (median: 16.00) months in metastatic tumours. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation of lung lesions is a minimally invasive procedure that is useful in primary tumours (especially in stage I) and metastatic ones. RF has proven its usefulness in the multidisciplinary treatment of this pathology due to the low incidence of serious complications and survival obtained, considering that patients are elderly with significant comorbidity (AU)

Study of survival in patients with malignant lung lesions treated with radiofrequency.

OBJECTIVE: To report on the survival of a series of patients with primary and metastatic lung tumours treated with radiofrequency (RF). Four years ago we published our preliminary experience with the use of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a period of 8 years we have treated 59 patients (by means of a total of 70 procedures) with primary or metastatic pulmonary neoplastic lesions, which fulfilled inclusion criteria to perform the technique. They were in all cases non-surgical lesions that had been either previously treated or not. The technique was performed in the radiology suite, under conscious analgo-sedation. We treated primary pulmonary lesions, neoplastic recurrences, or metastases with curative or palliative intention (pain management). RESULTS: Current global survival rate is 19 patients (32 %) with a mean of 26.61 ± 3.17 months (range: 20.38 ± 32.83) and a median of 16.00 ± 3.57 (range: 8.99-23.00). If we establish the difference between primary and metastatic tumours, mean survival is 27.62 ± 4.12 months in primary tumours (median: 16.00) vs. 24.65 ± 4.47 months in metastatic tumours (median: 16.00). When we studied the survival in those cases with a curative intent, mean survival in primary tumours was 30.97 ± 4.57 months (median: 21.00) vs. 25.14 ± 4.68 (median: 16.00) months in metastatic tumours. CONCLUSIONS: RF ablation of lung lesions is a minimally invasive procedure that is useful in primary tumours (especially in stage I) and metastatic ones. RF has proven its usefulness in the multidisciplinary treatment of this pathology due to the low incidence of serious complications and survival obtained, considering that patients are elderly with significant comorbidity.