Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 44(3): 128-135, mar. 2012.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-97602

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Analizar la prevalencia de los resultados negativos asociados a la medicación (RNM) que son causa de consulta en un servicio de urgencias de atención primaria (SUAP) en un entorno rural. Determinar la evitabilidad y la gravedad de los mismos. Diseño: Estudio observacional descriptivo transversal. Emplazamiento: SUAP de Mula. Murcia. Participantes: Un total de 330 pacientes, en un periodo de 33 semanas. Mediciones principales: Número y tipo de RNM: el farmacéutico, a través de los datos obtenidos de un cuestionario validado y la historia clínica, evaluó si existía relación entre los medicamentos que toma el paciente y el motivo de acudir a urgencias. En caso de sospecha de RNM se reevaluaba con el médico y se confirmaban o no los RNM identificados. Resultados: De los 330 pacientes fueron evaluables 317. La media de edad de los pacientes era de 39,63 años y el 51,42% eran mujeres. La media de medicamentos que utilizaban fue de 1,38. Se detectaron un 26,50% (IC 95% 21,94-31,62) de pacientes con RNM como causa de visita a urgencias. El 53,57% de los RNM detectados fue de la categoría de efectividad y el 40,48% de necesidad. El 77,41% (IC-95% 67,35-85,01) de las visitas causadas por RNM fueron evitables. En cuanto a la gravedad, el 92,986% de los RNM eran leves. Conclusiones: Una de cada 4 visitas al SUAP de Mula está causada por un RNM y, de ellas, el 77,41% son evitables(AU()


Objective: Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes in Primary Care Emergency visits in a rural environment, and to determine their preventability and severity. Design: Descriptive study with an analytical component. Site: Primary Care Emergency Service (SUAP), Mula Murcia. Patients: The study consisted of 330 patients over a 33 week period. Method: Number and type of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes: Pharmacist through the data, a validated questionnaire and medical history, assessing whether there was a relationship between the medications and the patient, and the reason for going to the Primary Care Emergency. In case of suspicion of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes the patient is reassessed by the doctor, and the Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes confirmed or not identified. Results: Of the 330 patients, 317 were evaluable. The mean age of patients was 39.63 years and 51.42% were women. The mean number of drugs used was 1.38, and 26.50% (95% CI, 21.94% -31.62%) patients were detected with Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes as a cause of visiting the Primary Care Emergency. 53.57% of the detected Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes detected as regards efficacy was 53.75%, 40.48% as regards need. More than three-quarters (77.41%; 95% CI, 67.35% -85.01%) of emergency visits caused by Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes were avoidable. In terms of severity, 92.86% of the Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes were mild. Conclusions: One in four Mula SUAP visits are due to a Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes, and 77.41% of them are preventable(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , /epidemiology , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Treatment/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Age and Sex Distribution
2.
Aten Primaria ; 44(3): 128-35, 2012 Mar.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21937148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes in Primary Care Emergency visits in a rural environment, and to determine their preventability and severity. DESIGN: Descriptive study with an analytical component. SITE: Primary Care Emergency Service (SUAP), Mula. Murcia. PATIENTS: The study consisted of 330 patients over a 33 week period. METHOD: Number and type of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes: Pharmacist through the data, a validated questionnaire and medical history, assessing whether there was a relationship between the medications and the patient, and the reason for going to the Primary Care Emergency. In case of suspicion of Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes the patient is reassessed by the doctor, and the Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes confirmed or not identified. RESULTS: Of the 330 patients, 317 were evaluable. The mean age of patients was 39.63 years and 51.42% were women. The mean number of drugs used was 1.38, and 26.50% (95% CI, 21.94% -31.62%) patients were detected with Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes as a cause of visiting the Primary Care Emergency. 53.57% of the detected Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes detected as regards efficacy was 53.75%, 40.48% as regards need. More than three-quarters (77.41%; 95% CI, 67.35% -85.01%) of emergency visits caused by Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes were avoidable. In terms of severity, 92.86% of the Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes were mild. CONCLUSIONS: One in four Mula SUAP visits are due to a Pharmacotherapy negative outcomes, and 77.41% of them are preventable.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Emergencies , Emergency Service, Hospital , Primary Health Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Rural Health , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...