Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871291

ABSTRACT

AIM: This work aims to evaluate whether electronic consultations (e-consults) are a clinically useful, safe tool for assessing patients between primary care and internal medicine. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all e-consults ordered by the Primary Care Department to the Internal Medicine Department between September 2019 and December 2023. The results of initial consultations, emergency department visits and subsequent admissions, and survival were assessed and complaints and claims filed were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 11,434 e-consults were recorded (55.4% women) with a mean age of 62.1 (SD19.4) years and a wide range (15-102 years). The mean response time was 2.55 (SD 1.6) days. As a result of the e-consults, 5645 patients (49.4%) were given an in-person appointment. For the remaining 5789 (50.6%), a written response was provided. Among those given appointments, the time between the response and in-person appointment was less than five days (95% of cases). Compared to those not given appointments, in-person appointments were older (p < 0.0001), visited the emergency department more times (one month: p = 0.04; three months: p = 0.001), were admitted to the hospital more times (one month: p = 0.0001; three months: p = 0.0001), and had higher mortality at one year (12.7% vs. 9.8% p = 0.0001). In the Cox analysis, only in-person appointments (RR = 1.11; p = 0.04)) and age (RR = 1.09; p < 0.01) were independent factors of mortality. No complaints or claims of any kind were registered. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that e-consults are a clinically useful, safe tool for assessing patients referred from primary care to internal medicine departments.

20.
Transplant Proc ; 37(3): 1515-6, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15866660

ABSTRACT

Hypertension is a frequent cardiovascular risk factor in liver transplant recipients. The usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in these patients is unknown. This study was aimed at evaluating the circadian rhythms of blood pressure in liver allograft recipients. In 53 liver transplant patients blood pressure was measured with the Spacelabs device program. No patient received antihypertensive therapy for at least 15 days beforehand. Clinical blood pressure measurement showed 26 patients to be hypertensive. Of these, ABPM verified the diagnosis in 23. Overall, 72% of the patients were hypertensive, and 39.5% showed a nondipper pattern. Diastolic hypertension was more frequent than systolic hypertension. No differences were found in renal function, immunosuppressive therapy, or corticosteroids.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Circadian Rhythm , Hypertension/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation/physiology , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...