Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Insect Biochem Mol Biol ; 80: 11-20, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27845250

ABSTRACT

Insect ryanodine receptors (RyR) are the molecular target-site for the recently introduced diamide insecticides. Diamides are particularly active on Lepidoptera pests, including tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). High levels of diamide resistance were recently described in some European populations of T. absoluta, however, the mechanisms of resistance remained unknown. In this study the molecular basis of diamide resistance was investigated in a diamide resistant strain from Italy (IT-GELA-SD4), and additional resistant field populations collected in Greece, Spain and Brazil. The genetics of resistance was investigated by reciprocally crossing strain IT-GELA-SD4 with a susceptible strain and revealed an autosomal incompletely recessive mode of inheritance. To investigate the possible role of target-site mutations as known from diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), we sequenced respective domains of the RyR gene of T. absoluta. Genotyping of individuals of IT-GELA-SD4 and field-collected strains showing different levels of diamide resistance revealed the presence of G4903E and I4746M RyR target-site mutations. These amino acid substitutions correspond to those recently described for diamide resistant diamondback moth, i.e. G4946E and I4790M. We also detected two novel mutations, G4903V and I4746T, in some of the resistant T. absoluta strains. Radioligand binding studies with thoracic membrane preparations of the IT-GELA-SD4 strain provided functional evidence that these mutations alter the affinity of the RyR to diamides. In combination with previous work on P. xylostella our study highlights the importance of position G4903 (G4946 in P. xylostella) of the insect RyR in defining sensitivity to diamides. The discovery of diamide resistance mutations in T. absoluta populations of diverse geographic origin has serious implications for the efficacy of diamides under applied conditions. The implementation of appropriate resistance management strategies is strongly advised to delay the further spread of resistance.


Subject(s)
Insect Proteins/genetics , Insecticide Resistance/genetics , Insecticides , Moths/physiology , Point Mutation , Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel/genetics , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Benzamides/pharmacology , Cloning, Molecular , DNA, Complementary/genetics , DNA, Complementary/metabolism , Insect Proteins/chemistry , Insect Proteins/metabolism , Moths/genetics , Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel/chemistry , Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel/metabolism , Sulfones/pharmacology , ortho-Aminobenzoates/pharmacology
2.
Pest Manag Sci ; 69(2): 217-27, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23034903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tuta absoluta(Meyrick) is one of the most serious pests of tomato recently introduced in the Mediterranean region. A novel bioassay method designed for the accurate determination of insecticide toxicity on T. absoluta (IRAC method No. 022) was validated by three different laboratories [Greece (NAGREF), Italy (UC) and Spain (UPCT)] on European populations. RESULTS: The insecticides indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole were used as reference products. The IRAC leaf dip method is easy to perform, producing repeatable, homogeneous responses. LC(50) values for indoxacarb ranged between 1.8 and 17.9 mg L(-1) (NAGREF), 0.93 and 10.8 mg L(-1) (UC) and 0.20 and 0.70 mg L(-1) (UPCT), resulting in a tenfold, 12-fold and fourfold difference between the least and most susceptible populations at each laboratory respectively. For chlorantraniliprole, LC(50) values ranged between 0.10 and 0.56 mg L(-1) (NAGREF), 0.23 and 1.34 mg L(-1) (UC) and 0.04 and 0.24 mg L(-1) (UPCT), resulting in a sixfold difference in all three cases. Overall, UPCT reported lower mean LC(50) to indoxacarb, while UC reported higher LC(50) to chlorantraniliprole. CONCLUSIONS: The new bioassay is reliable, providing a useful tool in the design of IRM strategies. Within each country/lab, the variability observed in the results for both indoxacarb and chlorantraniliprole can be attributed to natural variation. Future research is necessary to determine the extent to which it is possible to compare results among laboratories.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Insecticides/pharmacology , Moths/drug effects , Oxazines/pharmacology , ortho-Aminobenzoates/pharmacology , Animals , Lethal Dose 50
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL