Clinical utility of combined Placido-scanning-slit midperipheral and thinnest point pachymetry after corneal ablation for myopia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the random error of the thinnest point and midperipheral pachymetry with a combined Placido-scanning-slit system (Orbscan II) in the intermediate-term follow-up of excimer laser keratorefractive surgery for treating myopia. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who had undergone aspheric surface ablation for treating myopia with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, and showed no biomicroscopically detectable corneal haze, were subjected to 5 consecutive topographic examinations. All eyes underwent a complete ophthalmic examination before the surgery. The within-subject SD (Sw), repeatability (2.77 × Sw), coefficient of repeatability (2.77 × Sw/mean), and intraclass correlation coefficients of pachymetry at the thinnest point and in each 4 quadrants at a 6-mm diameter were calculated. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 31.9 ± 6.2 years, and the average follow-up was for 7.5 ± 2.6 months. The mean ablation depth for myopia was 63.6 ± 23.6 µm. The average pachymetry for the thinnest point and midperipheral superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal locations was 456.9, 602.0, 595.5, 609.7, and 566.1 µm, respectively. The repeatability (and coefficient of repeatability) for the thinnest point and midperipheral superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal locations was 26.5 (5.8%), 37.9 (6.3%), 31.0 (5.2%), 30.5 (5.0%), and 35.4 µm (6.2%), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.96, 0.88, 0.89, 0.97, and 0.91 for each location, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the repeatability of the thinnest and midperipheral pachymetry using the combined Placido-scanning-slit system in transparent corneas after laser keratorefractive surgery for treatment of myopia. The test-retest reliability provided here will help differentiate real corneal thickness change from measurement noise. For this, only pachymetric changes >6% are likely to be real and therefore useful when evaluating postoperative keratectasia suspects.

Dependability of pachymetry measurements after myopic advanced surface ablation using scanning-slit topography and specular microscopy.

PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability, intersession and interobserver reproducibility, and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by scanning-slit topography (SST) and noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM) after advanced surface ablation (ASA). METHODS: To analyze repeatability, one examiner measured 63 post-myopic ASA eyes five times successively using both techniques randomly. To calculate interobserver reproducibility a second examiner obtained another CCT measurement in a random fashion. To study intersession reproducibility, the first operator obtained CCT measurements from another 24 eyes during two sessions 1 week apart. RESULTS: With regard to intrasession repeatability, SST and NCSM within-subject standard deviation (S(w)) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were 7.35 and 3.81 µm, and 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. For interobserver reproducibility, SST measurement variability showed correlation with CCT magnitude (r(s) = -0.38; P = 0.002), whereas NCSM did not. NCSM S(w) and ICC were 3.83 µm and 0.99, respectively. For intersession reproducibility, no difference in CCT measurements was found for any technique; S(w) and ICC estimates for SST and NCSM were 12.2 and 8.37 µm, and 0.94 and 0.95, respectively. We found a tendency for the difference (mean SST-NCSM = 13.39 µm) to increase in thicker corneas (r(s) = 0.45, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both noncontact pachymetry techniques provided highly repeatable and quite reproducible CCT measurements in post-ASA patients having no clinically significant corneal haze, except for SST interobserver reproducibility, which decreased in thinner corneas. However, the techniques were not interchangeable. The estimates provided should help clinicians differentiate real CCT change from noncontact pachymetry measurement variability after ASA.

Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a new Placido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.

PURPOSE: To assess the intrasession and intersession precision of ocular, corneal, and internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) measured using an integrated topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (Topcon KR-1W) in refractive surgery candidates. SETTING: IOBA-Eye Institute, Valladolid, Spain. DESIGN: Evaluation of diagnostic technology. METHODS: To analyze intrasession repeatability, 1 experienced examiner measured eyes 9 times successively. To study intersession reproducibility, the same clinician obtained measurements from another set of eyes in 2 consecutive sessions 1 week apart. Ocular, corneal, and internal HOAs were obtained. Coma and spherical aberrations, 3rd- and 4th-order aberrations, and total HOAs were calculated for a 6.0 mm pupil diameter. RESULTS: For intrasession repeatability (75 eyes), excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained (ICC >0.87), except for internal primary coma (ICC = 0.75) and 3rd-order (ICC = 0.72) HOAs. Repeatability precision (1.96 × S(w)) values ranged from 0.03 µm (corneal primary spherical) to 0.08 µm (ocular primary coma). For intersession reproducibility (50 eyes), ICCs were good (>0.8) for ocular primary spherical, 3rd-order, and total higher-order aberrations; reproducibility precision values ranged from 0.06 µm (corneal primary spherical) to 0.21 µm (internal 3rd order), with internal HOAs having the lowest precision (≥0.12 µm). No systematic bias was found between examinations on different days. CONCLUSIONS: The intrasession repeatability was high; therefore, the device's ability to measure HOAs in a reliable way was excellent. Under intersession reproducibility conditions, dependable corneal primary spherical aberrations were provided. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

BACKGROUND: Theoretically, the accommodative and vergence demands are different between single-vision contact lenses and spectacle lenses. The aim of the present study was to determine whether these differences exist when these two correction methods are used in clinical practice. For this, different visual parameters that characterize the accommodative (accommodation amplitude, accommodative facility, and accommodative response) and binocular function (near and distance horizontal and vertical dissociated phorias, near and vertical associated phorias, near and distance negative and positive fusional vergence, vergence facility, near point of convergence, negative and positive relative accommodation, stimulus AC:A ratio and stereoacuity) were evaluated in a student population when their myopia was corrected with either spectacles or soft contact lenses (SCL). METHODS: All parameters were measured on two separate occasions in 30 myopic habitual contact lens and spectacle wearers of mean age 19 ± 2.4 years. Some parameters such as accommodation amplitude, accommodative response, and stimulus AC:A ratio were measured using two measurement methods which are commonly used in clinical practice. Three measurements were taken for each parameter and averaged. For the comparative statistical analysis, we used the Student's t-test (p value < 0.05). RESULTS: The following statistically significant differences were found with the use of SCL in comparison to spectacles: higher accommodative lags, higher negative relative accommodation, more esophoric near horizontal dissociated phoria, and lower negative fusional vergence in near vision. CONCLUSIONS: The results found in this study show a definite trend towards poorer accommodative and vergence function with the use of contact lenses in comparison to glasses. This downward trend, though not statistically significant in accommodative function (lower PRA values and less lens amplitude of accommodation) might suggest that temporal insufficiency in the accommodation process could be occurring while contact lenses are used, thereby possibly creating a lag in accommodation to reduce associated overconvergence. This would be manifested in more esophoric values being found in the vergence function. The higher accommodative lags found in this study with SCL could indicate that prolonged use of SCL in near tasks may provoke a continuous hyperopic retinal defocus, a risk factor for the onset and progression of myopia, as indicated in numerous studies.