Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm follow-up: when the phone rings. Changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and patient satisfaction. Experience in 30 health centers in Spain.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has favored the expansion of telemedicine. Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-MPN) might be good candidates for virtual follow-up. In this study, we aimed to analyze the follow-up of patients with Ph-MPN in Spain during COVID-19, its effectiveness, and acceptance among patients. We present a multicenter retrospective study from 30 centers. Five hundred forty-one patients were included with a median age of 67 years (yr). With a median follow-up of 19 months, 4410 appointments were recorded. The median of visits per patient was 7 and median periodicity was 2.7 months; significantly more visits and a higher frequency of them were registered in myelofibrosis (MF) patients. 60.1% of visits were in-person, 39.5% were by telephone, and 0.3% were videocall visits, with a predominance of telephone visits for essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients over MF, as well as for younger patients (< 50 yr). The proportion of phone visits significantly decreased after the first semester of the pandemic. Pharmacological modifications were performed only in 25.7% of the visits, and, considering overall management, ET patients needed fewer global treatment changes. Telephone contact effectiveness reached 90% and only 5.4% required a complementary in-person appointment. Although 56.2% of the cohort preferred in-person visits, 90.5% of our patients claimed to be satisfied with follow-up during the pandemic, with an 83% of positive comments. In view of our results, telemedicine has proven effective and efficient, and might continue to play a complementary role in Ph-MPN patients' follow-up.

Treatment with daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis: a multicentric retrospective study and review of the literature.

Management of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AL amyloidosis is complex. Some initial reports have shown positive results with daratumumab in heavily pre-treated AL amyloidosis patients. In this retrospective multicentric study, 38 patients (mean age 64 ± 9 years) with R/R AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab were included. Cardiac and renal involvement was present in 76 and 74% of patients, and 42% had ≥3 organs involved. Median number of previous lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-8). Overall hematological response was 72%, including 28% complete responses. The median time to first hematological response was 2 weeks. A high-quality response (≥very good partial response) was obtained in 65% of patients who had never achieved such depth of response previously. Hematological responses were more frequent among patients receiving daratumumab as second-line therapy compared to subsequent therapies (92 vs. 61%). Cardiac and renal organ response rates were 37 and 59%. At 12 months, overall and progression-free survival were 59% (95%CI: 0.36-0.77) and 52% (95%CI: 0.29-0.70), respectively. Daratumumab is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of R/R AL amyloidosis and should be considered early in the course of the disease.