Influence of Stress and Depression on the Immune System in Patients Evaluated in an Anti-aging Unit.

BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence pointing out that stress and depression produce a dramatic impact on human well-being mainly through impairing the regular function of the immune system and producing a low-chronic inflammation status that favors the occurrence of infections, metabolic diseases, and even cancer. The present work aims to evaluate the stress/depression levels of some patients treated in an antiaging unit and detect any potential relationship with their immune system status prior of the implementation of a physical/psychological program designed to prevent health deterioration. METHODS: We evaluated 48 patients (16 men and 32 women with a mean age of 55.11 ± 10.71 years) from middle-upper class from psychological and immunological points of view. In particular, we analyzed neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis; lymphocyte chemotaxis and proliferation, and natural killer (NK) cell activity. RESULTS: Women showed more depressive symptoms than men. Chemotaxis levels of lymphocytes and neutrophils in women showed a significant reduction compared with those in men. We also found a strong negative correlation between depression and NK cell function. This correlation was also significant independently of gender. CONCLUSION: We conclude that NK activity is affected at least by depression state, and we propose that a combined treatment consisting of cognitive behavioral therapy and physical activity programs might improve patient health deterioration.

Anti-Müllerian hormone levels to predict oocyte maturity and embryo quality during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) outcome parameters and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) serum levels during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in women with varying ovarian reserve levels. METHODS: Prospective study of 46 women undergoing GnRH-antagonist short protocol for IVF. Participants included women with low ovarian reserve (N.=11), normoreserve (N.=16), and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS; N.=19). AMH was measured on menstrual cycle day 1-3 (basal AMH), on the day of GnRH-antagonist administration (AMH-GnRH), on the day of hCG administration (AMH-hCG), and in follicular fluid on the day of oocyte retrieval (AMH-FF). RESULTS: Basal AMH was significantly correlated (P<0.001) with antral follicle count and number of follicles >11mm on hCG day (P<0.05). Both basal AMH and AMH-GnRH were significantly correlated (P<0.05) with the number of oocytes retrieved and metaphase II. AMH-hCG was correlated with top quality embryos (P=0.04). No correlations were found between COH outcome parameters and AMH-FF. CONCLUSIONS: Basal AMH serum concentration was the strongest predictor of oocyte yield. AMH concentration at the mid-follicular phase was also a good predictor of oocyte yield and this marker was the only useful ovarian reserve indicator during the follicle growth process to predict IVF outcomes. AMH-hCG levels appear to predict embryo quality. AMH levels during the COH can provide valuable data to help individualize treatment and predict COH results.

Anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics during GNRH-antagonist short protocol for IVF/ICSI in women with varying ovarian reserve levels.

BACKGROUND: Data on variations in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels according to ovarian reserve are scant. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in AMH levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with a GnRH-antagonist protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 46 women. The subjects were divided into three cohorts according to ovarian reserve levels: polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS; N.=19), low ovarian reserve (LOR; N.=11), and normoreserve (NR; N.=16). Serum AMH concentration was measured at baseline (cycle day 2-3 before follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] administration) and just prior to GnRH-antagonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. AMH concentration in follicular fluid (FF) was assessed on the day of oocyte retrieval. RESULTS: AMH serum concentration decreased significantly (P<0.001) and progressively in all three groups from baseline (initiation of stimulation) to all subsequent assessments. Serum AMH levels were significantly higher in the PCOS group at all determinations: (AMH1: 8.18±6.26ng/mL, AMH2: 5.3±3.97ng/mL, AMH3: 2.19±1.31ng/mL) versus the NR group (AMH1: 2.94±1.53ng/mL, AMH2: 1.44±0.77ng/mL, AMH3: 0.71±0.57ng/mL) and LOR group (AMH1: 0.63±0.42ng/mL, AMH2: 0.58±0.4ng/mL, AMH3: 0.31±0.2ng/mL). No significant between-group differences were observed for AMH levels in FF (PCOS: 3.56±3.19ng/mL, NR: 4.06±5.44ng/mL, LOR: 1.31±0.47ng/mL) nor for fertilization rate, number of top quality embryos, or clinical pregnancy rates. CONCLUSIONS: Serum AMH levels gradually decrease during GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF. This decrease starts at the beginning of the follicular phase and continues up to the day of hCG administration. These results underscore the important role that AMH plays in the process of folliculogenesis and dominant follicle selection.