Estudio comparativo del uso de implante mamario únicamente o implante y malla biológica en reconstrucción inmediata tras mastectomía ahorradora de piel / Comparative study of the use of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with or without biological dermal mesh after skin-sparing mastectomy

Objetivo. Valorar las complicaciones postoperatorias en pacientes intervenidas mediante mastectomía ahorradora de piel o piel y aréola-pezón, con reconstrucción inmediata e implantación de prótesis o prótesis más malla biológica. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio prospectivo. Periodo de estudio: octubre de 2011-octubre de 2014. Criterios de inclusión: cáncer de mama multicéntrico, carcinoma ductal in situ con indicación de mastectomía y tumores cT2 que no tuvieron respuesta a tratamiento sistémico primario. Criterios de exclusión: edad > 75 años. Grupo control: pacientes reconstruidas mediante prótesis. Grupo estudio: pacientes reconstruidas mediante prótesis y malla biológica de dermis porcina acelular, no entrecruzada, de 1,6 mm e hidratada. Resultados. Se incluyeron en el grupo de estudio 34 pacientes, y en el grupo control, 38 pacientes. Extrusión de prótesis: grupo estudio uno (2,9%); grupo control 9 (23,7%) (p = 0,015). Infecciones: grupo estudio 3 (8,8%); grupo control 3 (7,9%) (p = 1). Necrosis cutánea: grupo estudio 5 (14,7%); grupo control 5 (13,2%) (p = 1). Seroma: grupo estudio 5 (14,7%); grupo control 5 (13,2%) (p = 1). Conclusión. Se ha observado una disminución significativa de la extrusión de la prótesis en las mujeres en las que se implantaron mallas biológicas. En seromas, infección y necrosis cutánea no observamos diferencias significativas (AU)

Objective. To evaluate postoperative complications after skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with or without biological dermal mesh. Patients and methods. Prospective study. Study period: October 2011-October 2014. Inclusion criteria: multicentre breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ with indication for mastectomy, and cT2 tumours with no response to primary systemic treatment. Exclusion criteria: patients older than 75 years. Control group: breast reconstructions with mammary prosthesis exclusively. Study group: breast reconstructions with implant and non-crosslinked biological 1.6 mm hydrated acellular porcine dermal mesh. Results. Thirty-four patients were included in the treatment group and 38 patients in the control group. Number of prosthesis extrusions: study group one (2.9%); control group 9 (23.7%) (P = .015). Infections: study group 3 (8.8%); control group 3 (7.9%) (P = 1). Skin necrosis: study group 5 (14.7%); control group 5 (13.2%) (P = 1). Seroma: study group 5 (14.7%); control group 5 (13.2%) (P = 1). Conclusion. The number of extrusions was significantly lower in breast reconstructions with prosthesis and biological mesh. No significant differences were observed in seroma, infection, or skin necrosis (AU)

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies serum angiotensinase activities in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the putative changes in serum angiotensinase activities (aminopeptidase N, APN; aminopeptidase B, APB; aminopeptidase A, APA; aspartyl aminopeptidase, ASAP) involved in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in women with breast cancer treated or not with a neoadjuvant therapy of paclitaxel and anthracycline and in healthy women volunteers. METHODS: We fluorometrically analysed serum APN, APB, APA and ASAP activities using their corresponding aminoacyl-ß-naphthylamides as substrates in women with breast cancer treated with a neoadjuvant therapy of paclitaxel and anthracycline. RESULTS: When compared with healthy controls, women with breast cancer not treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, showed a decrease in angiotensinase activity, which support the putative increase of angiotensin II (Ang II) levels, indicating that the tumour process would favour the development of the disease. Also, an increase in APN and APB activities was observed, which support a role for angiotensin IV (Ang IV). In women treated with a neoadjuvant therapy, we described an increase in ASAP and APA activities, supporting the idea that this treatment increases Ang II catabolism. The resulting decrease in Ang II level could lead to an inhibition of the tumour growth. CONCLUSION: Present results show changes in serum angiotensinase activities in women with breast cancer and in women with breast cancer treated with a neoadjuvant therapy of paclitaxel and anthracycline. Therefore, considerable attention should be focused on the development of RAS blockade therapy as a new strategy for breast cancer treatment.

Putative relationship between hormonal status and serum pyrrolidone carboxypeptidase activity in pre- and post- menopausal women with breast cancer.

In breast cancer, hormonal changes are rather constant in post-menopausal women since they tend to vary only over long time spans. However, in pre-menopausal women, the development of breast cancer is associated with hormonal physiological variations. The aim of the present work was to analyse the changes in circulating levels of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) in pre- and post-menopausal women that were healthy or with breast cancer, and their connection to serum pyrrolidone carboxypeptidase (Pcp) activity. We observed significant changes in the hormonal profile in post-menopausal women with breast cancer compared to the control group. In pre-menopausal women, we found significant changes in circulating GnRH levels with respect to the healthy group. Our present results support the existence of neuroendocrine misregulation that could be involved in tumour progression, with Pcp being a potentially new pharmacological target in breast cancer treatments.