Methodological considerations in the determination of working length.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of an electronic system for the determination of working length, in comparison with two radiological methods (conventional film and digital radiography). METHODOLOGY: The study sample consisted of 28 root canals belonging to 20 human mandibular teeth. A comparison was made between the working length measurements obtained by two radiological methods (conventional film and digital radiography) and an apex locator, using as gold standard the observation of the file position within the root following selective grinding of the root tissue. RESULTS: The electronic method was satisfactory in 67.8% of cases, versus 50.6% and 61.4% for the conventional and digital radiological methods. respectively. No statistically significant differences occurred between the techniques according to the chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric tests. CONCLUSIONS: None of the techniques was totally satisfactory in establishing the true working length. There were no differences between the techniques investigated.

Analysis of radiologic factors in determining premolar root canal systems.

OBJECTIVES: Certain tooth groups pose problems as to radiologic determination of root canal morphology. For example, the premolars may have superimposed roots that give the appearance of a single canal when 2 are actually present. This study examined the effect of X-ray tube inclination so as to visualize the complete root canal system in premolars. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred extracted premolars were divided into 4 groups of 25 teeth each: 1MxP (first maxillary premolar), 2MxP (second maxillary premolar), 1MdP (first mandibular premolar), and 2MdP (second mandibular premolar). A total of 10 radiographs were made of each tooth in the horizontal and vertical planes (horizontal angles of 0, 20, and 40 degrees, then vertical angles of 0, 15, and 30 degrees). Logistic regression analysis was used for the statistical analysis of the results--the dependent variable being the number of canals visualized. RESULTS: On varying the horizontal angle (20 and 40 degrees), the number of root canals observed in the case of 1MxP, 2MxP, and 1MdP coincided with the actual number of canals present. In the case of 2MdP, only the 40 degree horizontal angle correctly identified the number of canals regardless of the vertical angle (although only 4% had more than 1 canal). CONCLUSIONS: Varying the horizontal angle improved the visualization of additional (superimposed) canals in premolars. Changing of the vertical angle had no statistically significant influence except for the first mandibular premolars.