Transient ischaemic attacks clinics provide equivalent and more efficient care than early in-hospital assessment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinics for early management of transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) have been developed in some stroke centres, resulting in reduced recurrence rates compared to appointment-based outpatient management, thus saving on hospitalization. We analysed the care process, recurrence rates and economic impact of the first year of work in our early-management TIA clinic and compared these with our previous in-hospital study protocols for low- and moderate-risk TIA patients. METHODS: This was a prospective evaluation of the management of low- to moderate-risk TIA patients, comparing a new TIA clinic model (2010) with a previous hospitalization model (2009). Demographic data, vascular risk factor profiles, diagnostic test performance, secondary prevention measures, final aetiological diagnoses and cerebrovascular recurrences at 7 and 90 days were compared between in-hospital and TIA clinic assessed patients. We also carried out an economic comparison of the costs of each model's process. RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven low- to moderate-risk TIA patients were included, of whom 40.8% were hospitalized. There were no differences between the TIA clinic assessed and in-hospital assessed patients in terms of risk factor diagnosis and secondary prevention measures. The stroke recurrence rate (2.4% vs. 1.2%; P = 0.65) was low and similar for both groups (CI 95%, 0.214-20.436; P = 0.52). Cost per patient was €393.28 for clinic versus €1931.18 for in-hospital management. Outpatient management resulted in a 77.8% reduction in hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Transient ischaemic attacks clinics are efficient for the early management of low- to moderate-risk TIA patients compared to in-hospital assessment, with no higher recurrence rates and at almost one-fifth the cost.

Off-hour effects on stroke care and outcome in stroke centres.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Poorer stroke care processes and outcomes have been reported for acute stroke patients arriving at centres during off hours and weekends. OBJECTIVE: To compare each step of the continuous specialized care that Stroke Centres (SC) provide according to time of admission and final outcome. METHODS: Observational study of consecutive stroke patients admitted to SC during 2008 and 2009. Patients were classified into two groups according to their arrival time: Work Hours (WH) and Off Hour (OH) (weekends and any time other than 8:00 am to 3:00 pm on weekdays). Differences in time to diagnostic procedures, tPA administration, stroke outcome [modified Rankin Scale, (mRS)] and in-hospital fatality rates were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 912 patients were admitted. Data from 674 patients fulfilling study criteria were analysed. A total of 434 (64.4%) patients arrived during OH. No differences in stroke severity were found when comparing OH and WH. Time to blood test results was higher for WH (median 67 min vs. 47 min; P < 0.01), but time to cranial CT scan was similar. Intravenous tPA was administered to 58 (16.4%) OH vs. 26 (13.1%) WH patients (P = 0.33). OH arrival was not associated with poorer outcome (mRS ≥ 3) at discharge (32.8% vs. 37%; P = 0.27), or at the 3-month follow-up (30.6% vs. 27.6%, P = 0.52). No differences were found for in-hospital fatality rates (5.8% vs. 5.4%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The care provided by SC with neurologists on call 24/7 prevents differences in outcomes associated with time of admission and guarantees equal attention to stroke patients.

Tratamiento previo con estatinas y riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas tras un infarto cerebral agudo / Previous statins treatment and risk of post-stroke infections

Introducción y objetivo: Diversos estudios clínicos y experimentales atribuyen un efecto inmunosupresor a las estatinas y la administración de simvastatina en la fase aguda del ictus se ha asociado a mayor frecuencia de infecciones durante el ingreso. Nuestro objetivo es comprobar si el consumo previo de estatinas influye en la aparición de complicaciones infecciosas intrahospitalarias tras un infarto cerebral (IC). Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional incluyendo pacientes con IC ingresados en la Unidad de Ictus. Se analizan: datos demográficos, factores de riesgo vascular, gravedad al ingreso, subtipo etiológico de infarto cerebral y consumo previo de estatinas. Se ha estudiado la aparición de las siguientes complicaciones infecciosas durante la hospitalización: neumonía, infección urinaria, colitis pseudomembranosa y sepsis de cualquier origen agrupando a los enfermos en dos grupos: pacientes que previamente tomaban o no estatinas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 2.045 pacientes (1.162 varones) con edad media de 69,05 años (DE 12,5). El 15% (306 pacientes) tomaba estatinas previamente al IC. Dichos pacientes presentaban con mayor frecuencia que los que no lo hacían (p<0,0001) antecedente de HTA, DM, arteriopatía periférica e hipercolesterolemia. La frecuencia de infección intrahospitalaria fue similar en ambos grupos, tanto evaluada de manera global (11,8% vs 13%, p=0,643) como al analizar cada una de las infecciones separadamente. En el subgrupo de IC aterotrombótico, las estatinas se asociaron con una menor frecuencia de sepsis (OR no ajustado 0,949, IC 95% [0,928 – 0,971]). Conclusiones: El tratamiento previo con estatinas parece no influir en la frecuencia de complicaciones infecciosas intrahospitalarias tras un IC agudo (AU)

Introduction: Clinical and laboratory studies have attributed an inmuno-supressor effect to the statins. Furthermore, the administration of simvastatin in the acute onset of stroke has been associated with an increased infection frequency. Our objective is to assess the influence of statins previous treatment on infection after ischemic stroke. Patients and methods: Observational study of patients with ischaemic stroke hospitalised in a Stroke Unit. Demographic data, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, stroke subtype and previous statins treatment were evaluated. The following infections were registered: pneumonia, urinary tract infection, pseudomembranous colitis and sepsis. The patients were classified into two groups, depending on previous statin treatment. Results: A total of 2045 patients were included (1165 were male, aged 69.05±12.5 years). Of these, 306 (15%) patients were receiving statins prior to stroke. These patients had more frequently arterial hypertension, DM, peripheral arterial disease and hypercholesterolaemia than the patients who were not treated with statins (P < 0001). There was no statistically significant difference between overall in-hospital infection frequency between patients treated with statins and those with no statins treatment, (11.8% vs. 13%), nor in individual infection type: pneumonia (7.8% vs. 10.2%), urinary tract infection (4.2% vs. 2.8%), pseudomembranous colitis (0.3% vs. 0.7%) and sepsis (2.6% vs. 4.4%). In the atherothrombotic stroke subtype, statins were associated with a lower frequency of sepsis (unadjusted OR, 0.949; 95% CI; 0.928-0.971). Conclusions: Previous treatment with statins does not appear to influence the frequency of in-hospital infections in patients with ischaemic stroke (AU)

Previous statins treatment and risk of post-stroke infections.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical and laboratory studies have attributed an inmuno-supressor effect to the statins. Furthermore, the administration of simvastatin in the acute onset of stroke has been associated with an increased infection frequency. Our objective is to assess the influence of statins previous treatment on infection after ischemic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational study of patients with ischaemic stroke hospitalised in a Stroke Unit. Demographic data, vascular risk factors, stroke severity, stroke subtype and previous statins treatment were evaluated. The following infections were registered: pneumonia, urinary tract infection, pseudomembranous colitis and sepsis. The patients were classified into two groups, depending on previous statin treatment. RESULTS: A total of 2045 patients were included (1165 were male, aged 69.05±12.5 years). Of these, 306 (15%) patients were receiving statins prior to stroke. These patients had more frequently arterial hypertension, DM, peripheral arterial disease and hypercholesterolaemia than the patients who were not treated with statins (P<0001). There was no statistically significant difference between overall in-hospital infection frequency between patients treated with statins and those with no statins treatment, (11.8% vs. 13%), nor in individual infection type: pneumonia (7.8% vs. 10.2%), urinary tract infection (4.2% vs. 2.8%), pseudomembranous colitis (0.3% vs. 0.7%) and sepsis (2.6% vs. 4.4%). In the atherothrombotic stroke subtype, statins were associated with a lower frequency of sepsis (unadjusted OR, 0.949; 95% CI; 0.928-0.971). CONCLUSIONS: Previous treatment with statins does not appear to influence the frequency of in-hospital infections in patients with ischaemic stroke.