Socioeconomic Position and Malnutrition among Older Adults: Results from the FRADEA Study.

OBJECTIVES: Low socioeconomic position (SEP) is related to many health-related conditions in older adults. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the association between SEP and malnutrition, a condition with serious consequences for older people in terms of quality of life and adverse health events. In the current study, we investigated socioeconomic inequalities in malnutrition and sub-domains of malnutrition in a sample of Spanish older adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional population-based study. SETTING: Urban area of Albacete, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 836 participants over age 70 from the first measurement wave (2007-2009) of the Frailty and Dependence in Albacete (FRADEA) study, a population-based cohort study. MEASUREMENTS: Educational level and occupational level were the indicators of SEP. Nutritional risk was measured with the Mini Nutrition Assessment® Short Form (MNA®-SF). Logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: For both socioeconomic indicators there was a statistically significant association with nutritional risk (OR low education=1.99, 95% CI=1.18-3.35; OR low occupational level=1.71, 95% CI=1.08-2.72). However, these associations disappeared after adjusting for age and sex (OR low education=1.51, 95% CI=0.88-2.60 ; OR low occupational level=1.32, 95% CI=0.80-2.17). In adjusted models, statistically significant associations between SEP and sub-domains of the MNA®-SF were observed, but these associations were not consistent across socioeconomic indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that malnutrition is a condition that can appear in any older adult, regardless of their socioeconomic group. These findings suggest that interventions to prevent malnutrition in older adults can be targeted at a general older population, and do not have to be SEP specific.

Frailty and Fear of Falling: The FISTAC Study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between frailty and Fear of Falling (FoF) in a cohort of older adults with previous falls. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (FISTAC). SETTING: Falls Unit, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario of Albacete (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: 183 adults older than 69 years, from the Falls Unit, with a history of a previous fall in the last year. MEASUREMENTS: FoF was assessed at baseline using the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) and three questions previously validated. Frailty was assessed with the frailty phenotype criteria. Age, gender, comorbidity, nutritional status, cognitive status and risk of depression were determined. RESULTS: Mean age 78.4, 80.3% women. FoF was present in 140 (76.5%) participants with the three questions and 102 (55.7%) presented high concern of falling with the FES-I. 88.8% of frail older adults presented FoF compared to 62.4% of those who were not frail, and only 37.8% of non frail had a high concern of falling, compared to 77.2% of those who were frail measured with the FES-I. Frail participants had an adjusted risk of FoF that was 3.18 (95% CI 1.32 to 7.65) higher compared to those who were not frail assessed with the three questions and 3.93 (95% CI 1.85 to 8.36) higher concern of falling when using the FES-I scale. Only female sex and depression risk were also associated to FoF in the final adjusted models. CONCLUSION: Frailty is independently associated with the FoF syndrome in older faller subjects.

Age, frailty, disability, institutionalization, multimorbidity or comorbidity. Which are the main targets in older adults?

OBJECTIVES: Age, frailty, disability, institutionalization, multimorbidity or comorbidity are main risk factors for serious health adverse outcomes in older adults. However, the adjusted relevance of each of them in order to determine which characteristics must be of importance for health policies in this population group, has not been established. DESIGN: Concurrent population-based cohort study. SETTING: Albacete city, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 842 participants over age 70 from the FRADEA Study. MEASUREMENTS: Age, gender, institutionalization, frailty (Fried's criteria), previous disability in basic activities of daily living (BADL) (Barthel index), comorbidity (Charlson index), and multimorbidity (≥ 2 from 14 selected diseases) were recorded in the basal visit. The combined event of mortality or incident disability in BADL was determined in the follow-up visit. The risk of presenting adverse events was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and institutionalization. RESULTS: Mean follow-up 520 days. 63 participants died (7.5%). Among the remaining 779, 191 lost at least one BADL (24.5%). The combined event of mortality or disability was present in 254 participants (30.2%). Age (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.06-1.14), frailty (OR 3.07, 95%CI 1.63-5.77), disability (OR 2.19, 95%CI 1.43-3.36) and institutionalization (OR 2.73, 95%CI 1.68-4.44) were independently associated with the combined adverse event, but not comorbidity or multimorbidity. In subjects younger than 80, only frailty, disability and institutionalization were risk factors, and in those aged ≥ 80, only age, disability and institutionalization were. CONCLUSIONS: Health policies for older adults must take into account mainly frailty and disability in subjects younger than 80 and disability in those older than 80.

Nutritional risk, nutritional status and incident disability in older adults. The FRADEA study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze if body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) as measures of nutritional status, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF) as a nutritional risk measure are associated with increased risk of incident disability in basic activities of daily living (BADL) in a population based cohort of Spanish older adults. DESIGN: Concurrent cohort study. SETTING: Albacete City, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 678 subjects over age 70 from the FRADEA Study (Frailty and Dependence in Albacete). MEASUREMENTS: BMI, WC and MNA-SF were recorded at the basal visit of the FRADEA Study. Incident disability in BADL was defined as loss of the ability to perform bathing, grooming, dressing, toilet use, or feeding from basal to follow-up visit, using the Barthel index. The association between nutritional status and nutritional risk with incident BADL disability was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, basal function, comorbidity, cognitive decline, depression risk and frailty status. RESULTS: Each point less of MNA-SF (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.04-1.31) and MNA-SF<14 (OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.39-3.89), but not MNA-SF<12 (OR 1.47, 95%CI 0.89-2.42) had a greater adjusted risk of incident disability in BADL. Neither BMI (OR 1.02, 95%CI 0.97-1.06) nor WC (OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.99-1.03) were associated. Weight loss (OR 1.75, 95%CI 1.08-2.83) and mobility impairment (OR 3.35, 95%CI 1.67-6.73) remained as adjusted predictors of incident BADL disability, while anorexia almost reached the significance (OR 1.65, 95%CI 0.94-2.87). CONCLUSION: Nutritional risk measured with the MNA-SF is associated with incident disability in BADL in older adults, while nutritional status measured with BMI or WC is not.