Midterm outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty / Resultados a medio plazo de la artroplastia femoropatelar

Background: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) survival and clinical and radiological outcomes in our institution. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of our institution patellofemoral arthroplasty cases from 2006 to 2018 was performed; the n sample after applying exclusion and inclusion criteria was 21. All patients excepting one were female with a median age of 63 (20–78). A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis at ten years was calculated. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior being included in the study. Results: The total revision rate was 6 out of 21 patients (28.57%). The progression of the osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment was the main cause (50% of revision surgeries). The degree of satisfaction with the PFA was high, with a mean Kujala score of 70.09 and a mean OKS of 35.45 points. The VAS score improved significantly (p<0.001) from a preoperative mean of 8.07 to a postoperative mean of 3.45, with an average improvement of 5 (2–8). Survival at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 73.5%. A significant positive correlation between BMI and the WOMAC pain (r=0.72, p<0.01) and between BMI and the post-operative VAS (r=0.67, p<0.01) was observed. Conclusions: The results of the case series under consideration suggest that PFA could be a possibility in the joint preservation surgery on the isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. BMI >30 seems to be a negative predictor factor in relationship with the postoperative satisfaction, increasing the pain proportionally to this index and requiring more replacement surgery than patients with BMI <30. Meanwhile the radiologic parameters of the implant are not correlated with the clinical or functional outcomes.(AU)

Antecedentes: El propósito de este estudio es la evaluación de la supervivencia de la prótesis femoropatelar y los resultados clínicos y radiológicos en nuestro centro. Métodos: En el presente estudio se realiza una evaluación retrospectiva de los casos de prótesis femoropatelar en nuestro centro entre los años 2006 y 2018. El tamaño muestral, tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y de exclusión, fue de 21 pacientes. Todos los pacientes excepto uno fueron mujeres, con una media de edad de 63 años (rango 20-78). Se calculó una gráfica de Kaplan-Meier de supervivencia en los primeros 10 años. El consentimiento informado de todos los pacientes fue obtenido previamente a la inclusión en este estudio. Resultados: La tasa de recambio a prótesis total fue 6 de 21 pacientes (28,57%). La progresión de la osteoartrosis en el compartimento tibiofemoral fue la causa principal (50% de las cirugías de revisión). El grado de satisfacción con la PFA fue alto, con una media en la escala de Kujala de 70,09 y una media de OKS de 35,45 puntos. La EVA mejoró significativamente (p<0,001), de una media preoperatoria de 8,07 a una media postoperatoria de 3,45, siendo la media de mejoría de 5 puntos (2 a 8 puntos). La supervivencia a los 10 años, con rescate de la prótesis debido a cualquier causa, fue del 73,5%. Se observó una correlación positiva ente el IMC y la escala WOMAC (r=0,72, p>0,01) y entre el IMC y la EVA postoperatoria (r=0,67 y p<0,01). Conclusiones: Los resultados de esta serie de casos mostraron que la prótesis femoropatelar puede ser una alternativa de tratamiento como cirugía de preservación de la osteoartritis femoropatelar aislada. El IMC>30 parece ser un factor predictor negativo en relación con la satisfacción postoperatoria, incrementando el dolor con una correlación positiva con este índice y requiriendo mayor cirugía de reemplazo que los pacientes con IMC<30. Por otra parte, los parámetros radiológicos relacionados con el implante no están...(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Resultados a medio plazo de la artroplastia femoropatelar / Midterm outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty

Background: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) survival and clinical and radiological outcomes in our institution. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of our institution patellofemoral arthroplasty cases from 2006 to 2018 was performed; the n sample after applying exclusion and inclusion criteria was 21. All patients excepting one were female with a median age of 63 (20–78). A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis at ten years was calculated. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior being included in the study. Results: The total revision rate was 6 out of 21 patients (28.57%). The progression of the osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment was the main cause (50% of revision surgeries). The degree of satisfaction with the PFA was high, with a mean Kujala score of 70.09 and a mean OKS of 35.45 points. The VAS score improved significantly (p<0.001) from a preoperative mean of 8.07 to a postoperative mean of 3.45, with an average improvement of 5 (2–8). Survival at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 73.5%. A significant positive correlation between BMI and the WOMAC pain (r=0.72, p<0.01) and between BMI and the post-operative VAS (r=0.67, p<0.01) was observed. Conclusions: The results of the case series under consideration suggest that PFA could be a possibility in the joint preservation surgery on the isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. BMI >30 seems to be a negative predictor factor in relationship with the postoperative satisfaction, increasing the pain proportionally to this index and requiring more replacement surgery than patients with BMI <30. Meanwhile the radiologic parameters of the implant are not correlated with the clinical or functional outcomes.(AU)

Antecedentes: El propósito de este estudio es la evaluación de la supervivencia de la prótesis femoropatelar y los resultados clínicos y radiológicos en nuestro centro. Métodos: En el presente estudio se realiza una evaluación retrospectiva de los casos de prótesis femoropatelar en nuestro centro entre los años 2006 y 2018. El tamaño muestral, tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y de exclusión, fue de 21 pacientes. Todos los pacientes excepto uno fueron mujeres, con una media de edad de 63 años (rango 20-78). Se calculó una gráfica de Kaplan-Meier de supervivencia en los primeros 10 años. El consentimiento informado de todos los pacientes fue obtenido previamente a la inclusión en este estudio. Resultados: La tasa de recambio a prótesis total fue 6 de 21 pacientes (28,57%). La progresión de la osteoartrosis en el compartimento tibiofemoral fue la causa principal (50% de las cirugías de revisión). El grado de satisfacción con la PFA fue alto, con una media en la escala de Kujala de 70,09 y una media de OKS de 35,45 puntos. La EVA mejoró significativamente (p<0,001), de una media preoperatoria de 8,07 a una media postoperatoria de 3,45, siendo la media de mejoría de 5 puntos (2 a 8 puntos). La supervivencia a los 10 años, con rescate de la prótesis debido a cualquier causa, fue del 73,5%. Se observó una correlación positiva ente el IMC y la escala WOMAC (r=0,72, p>0,01) y entre el IMC y la EVA postoperatoria (r=0,67 y p<0,01). Conclusiones: Los resultados de esta serie de casos mostraron que la prótesis femoropatelar puede ser una alternativa de tratamiento como cirugía de preservación de la osteoartritis femoropatelar aislada. El IMC>30 parece ser un factor predictor negativo en relación con la satisfacción postoperatoria, incrementando el dolor con una correlación positiva con este índice y requiriendo mayor cirugía de reemplazo que los pacientes con IMC<30. Por otra parte, los parámetros radiológicos relacionados con el implante no están...(AU)

Midterm outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. / [Artículo traducido] Resultados a medio plazo de la artroplastia femoropatelar.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) survival and clinical and radiological outcomes in our institution. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of our institution patellofemoral arthroplasty cases from 2006 to 2018 was performed; the n sample after applying exclusion and inclusion criteria was 21. All patients excepting one were female with a median age of 63 (20-78). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at ten years was calculated. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior being included in the study. RESULTS: The total revision rate was 6 out of 21 patients (28.57%). The progression of the osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment was the main cause (50% of revision surgeries). The degree of satisfaction with the PFA was high, with a mean Kujala score of 70.09 and a mean OKS of 35.45 points. The VAS score improved significantly (P<.001) from a preoperative mean of 8.07 to a postoperative mean of 3.45, with an average improvement of 5 (2-8). Survival at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 73.5%. A significant positive correlation between BMI and the WOMAC pain (r=.72, P<.01) and between BMI and the post-operative VAS (r=.67, P<.01) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the case series under consideration suggest that PFA could be a possibility in the joint preservation surgery on the isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. BMI >30 seems to be a negative predictor factor in relationship with the postoperative satisfaction, increasing the pain proportionally to this index and requiring more replacement surgery than patients with BMI <30. Meanwhile the radiologic parameters of the implant are not correlated with the clinical or functional outcomes.

Midterm outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is the evaluation of the patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) survival and clinical and radiological outcomes in our institution. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of our institution patellofemoral arthroplasty cases from 2006 to 2018 was performed; the n sample after applying exclusion and inclusion criteria was 21. All patients excepting one were female with a median age of 63 (20-78). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at ten years was calculated. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior being included in the study. RESULTS: The total revision rate was 6 out of 21 patients (28.57%). The progression of the osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral compartment was the main cause (50% of revision surgeries). The degree of satisfaction with the PFA was high, with a mean Kujala score of 70.09 and a mean OKS of 35.45 points. The VAS score improved significantly (p<0.001) from a preoperative mean of 8.07 to a postoperative mean of 3.45, with an average improvement of 5 (2-8). Survival at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 73.5%. A significant positive correlation between BMI and the WOMAC pain (r=0.72, p<0.01) and between BMI and the post-operative VAS (r=0.67, p<0.01) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the case series under consideration suggest that PFA could be a possibility in the joint preservation surgery on the isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. BMI >30 seems to be a negative predictor factor in relationship with the postoperative satisfaction, increasing the pain proportionally to this index and requiring more replacement surgery than patients with BMI <30. Meanwhile the radiologic parameters of the implant are not correlated with the clinical or functional outcomes.