In vivo exposure to high or low cortisol has biphasic effects on inflammatory response pathways of human monocytes.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate that glucocorticoids (GCs) have both supportive (stimulatory) and suppressive effects on immune responses, depending upon the GC concentration. Since some GC effects on inflammation are stimulatory, we hypothesized that acute in vivo GC depletion would decrease inflammatory responses of human monocytes. METHODS: Monocytes were isolated from healthy volunteer participants before and after in vivo treatment with; 1) IV saline, 2) IV high dose hydrocortisone (8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) followed by oral hydrocortisone overnight, and 3) oral RU486 (200 mg at 0400 and 1600 h) to block the intracellular GC receptor and IV etomidate (1.5 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) for 12 h to prevent compensatory adrenal cortisol synthesis. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone, plasma, and salivary cortisol were measured serially. Monocytes were tested for; 1) cytokine responses, 2) expression of CD163, CD119, and CD54, and 3) mRNA levels of GC-responsive inflammatory mediators. All measurements were made with and without in vitro stimulation of monocytes by lipopolysaccharide. RESULTS: Cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone measurements demonstrated effective manipulation of in vivo cortisol. In vivo hypercortisolemia and in vivo GC depletion had reciprocal effects on monocyte mRNA levels of 4 important GC-responsive molecules: 1) GC receptor, CD163, interleukin-10, and suppressor of the cytokine synthesis-3. Monocyte cytokine responses and protein expression were not affected by GC depletion. CD163 expression was increased by hypercortisolemia. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term GC depletion affects mRNA levels of GC-responsive molecules but does not affect monocyte protein expression or cytokine responses.

The synthetic triterpenoid CDDO-Im inhibits fatty acid synthase expression and has antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in human liposarcoma cells.

Liposarcomas constitute a rare group of tumors of mesenchymal origin that are often poorly responsive to therapy. This study characterizes a novel human liposarcoma cell line (LiSa-2) and defines the mechanism of its response to a synthetic triterpenoid. Fatty acid synthase (FAS) is a key enzyme of de-novo fatty acid synthesis and is highly expressed in both human liposarcoma tissue specimens and LiSa-2 cells. Treatment of the LiSa-2 cell line with the synthetic triterpenoid 2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oic imidazolide (CDDO-Im) markedly inhibited FAS mRNA expression, FAS protein production and FAS gene promoter activity. As expected, fatty acid synthesis was down regulated, but there was no effect on cellular fatty acid uptake or glycerol-3-phosphate synthesis suggesting a selective inhibition of endogenous fatty acid synthesis. Importantly, CDDO-Im produced a dose-dependent apoptotic effect in the LiSa-2 cell line, and simultaneous treatment with CDDO-Im and the fatty acid synthase inhibitor Cerulenin produced a synergistic cytotoxic effect. Thus, CDDO-Im and Cerulenin act at different loci to inhibit long chain fatty acid synthesis in liposarcoma cells. This study's demonstration of CDDO-Im inhibition of FAS and Spot 14 (S14) expression is the first report of triterpenoid compounds affecting the fatty acid synthesis pathway. The observed dependence of liposarcomas on lipogenesis to support their growth and survival provides a novel approach to the treatment of liposarcomas with agents that target fatty acid production.

S14 protein in breast cancer cells: direct evidence of regulation by SREBP-1c, superinduction with progestin, and effects on cell growth.

Most breast cancers exhibit brisk lipogenesis, and require it for growth. S14 is a lipogenesis-related nuclear protein that is overexpressed in most breast cancers. Sterol response element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) is required for induction of lipogenesis-related genes, including S14 and fatty acid synthase (FAS), in hepatocytes, and correlation of SREBP-1c and FAS expression suggested that SREBP-1c drives lipogenesis in tumors as well. We directly tested the hypothesis that SREBP-1c drives S14 expression and mediates lipogenic effects of progestin in T47D breast cancer cells. Dominant-negative SREBP-1c inhibited induction of S14 and FAS mRNAs by progestin, while active SREBP-1c induced without hormone and superinduced in its presence. Changes in S14 mRNA were reflected in protein levels. A lag time and lack of progestin response elements indicated that S14 and FAS gene activation by progestin is indirect. Knockdown of S14 reduced, whereas overexpression stimulated, T47D cell growth, while nonlipogenic MCF10a mammary epithelial cells were not growth-inhibited. These data directly demonstrate that SREBP-1c drives S14 gene expression in breast cancer cells, and progestin magnifies that effect via an indirect mechanism. This supports the prediction, based on S14 gene amplification and overexpression in breast tumors, that S14 augments breast cancer cell growth and survival.