The quality-adjusted life-years in the oncological patients' health-related quality of life.

The oncological treatment can significantly affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which should be monitored to ensure our patients' well-being. The often-used HRQoL measurer is the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) indicator of the disease burden, describing both quality and quantity of life lived. The main aim of the study was to discuss the methodology and usefulness of evaluating QALYs using the HRQoL questionnaires: EuroQoL (EQ)-5 dimensions-3 levels (EQ-5D-3L) and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) in 32 cervical cancer patients. We obtained the questionnaire and calculated QALYs based on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) method. In our study, the total scoring of the EQ-Index, EQ-VAS evaluation was 2620 and 2409 points, respectively, which corresponds with the QALYs value of 26.2 and 24.9, respectively. We expressed the QALYs outcome into the economic equivalent of nearly 900,000 US dollars (USD) as the total health profit for both the patients and the healthcare system. Obtaining the QALY factor can help establish the medical management's influence on the patients' HRQoL and improve the healthcare services to ensure the best health outcomes.

Will Rogers phenomenon in the oesophageal cancer patients staging - CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The oesophageal cancer is one of the most common and aggressive malignancies, especially in elder man. The method of choice in diagnosis of the oesophageal cancer patients are the contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and the 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) examinations. AIM: This study is to evaluate and compare the contrast-enhanced CT and the 18F-FDG PET/CT methods of imaging in terms of the oesophageal cancer staging and restaging using the eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The studied group consisted of 25 retrospectively analyzed patients (23 men, 2 women; mean age±SD: 60±11 years, range: 33-78 years, median: 62 years, p=0.09) who underwent the contrast-enhanced CT and the 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning within one to eight weeks. All mentioned lesions were histopathologically examined. Among these patients, 12 did not receive any treatment and 13 subjects have been treated with the chemotherapy and the external beam radiotherapy using comparable therapeutic protocols. RESULTS: In 13 subjects PET/CT method occurred as more sensitive in terms of pre- and posttreatment staging than CT and in 10 from 13 cases, involving the 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging into diagnostic management affected the therapeutic protocol. In 11 cases both methods showed comaparable or similar stage of the disease and in 1 patient both methods showed no pathology. CONCLUSION: In this material, the 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to be more accurate in terms of staging in case of the oesophageal cancer TNM classification.

What is the possible role of PSA doubling time (PSADT) and PSA velocity (PSAV) in the decision-making process to initiate salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer?

This article is an attempt to present a contemporary view on the role of the kinetics of PSA levels as defined by PSA doubling time (PSADT) and PSA velocity (PSAV) in the decision-making process to initiate salvage radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). The dynamics of the rise of PSA levels may be an early endpoint parameter, preceding the diagnosis of distant metastasis or death due to prostate cancer based on a single PSA determination. Thus, it seems reasonable to include the kinetics of PSA levels, apart from single PSA determination, in the decision-making algorithm. In a group of patients after RP, PSADT might be an early endpoint that could replace cause-specific survival rate as a late endpoint. PSADT allows distinguishing subgroups of patients at high risk of distant metastases and death, which in turn may lead to a change in the further treatment strategy. Therefore, patients with short PSA doubling time should become a subgroup, in which hormonal therapy should be considered. To date, there is no unanimous consent to accept the criteria of assessment of the dynamics of PSA levels as determinants of treatment in case of recurrences following RP. However, a number of non-randomized clinical trials in patients after RP suggest it would be useful to include these parameters in the decision-making process. For instance, a relationship was found between increased PSA velocity (>2 ng/mL/year) before initiation of oncological treatment and increased (12-fold) risk of death. A number of well-documented retrospective analyses show that PSADT is one of the most important parameters to describe the disease aggressiveness. It has to be stressed that single determination of PSA levels is much less precise in terms of describing the biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer than PSADT. Of course, the question regarding the need to include the PSA levels kinetic parameters as crucial elements of patient management algorithms can be answered in a definitive manner only by randomized clinical trials.

Radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: the state of the art.

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is used routinely in combination with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with high-risk clinically localized or locally advanced disease. The combined treatment (ADT-EBRT) also seems to play a significant role in improving treatment results in the intermediate-risk group of prostate cancer patients. On the other hand, there is a growing body of evidence that treatment with ADT can be associated with serious and lifelong adverse events including osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and many others. Almost all ADT adverse events are time dependant and tend to increase in severity with prolongation of hormonal manipulation. Therefore, it is crucial to clearly state the optimal schedule for ADT in combination with EBRT, that maintaining the positive effect on treatment efficacy would keep the adverse events risk at reasonable level. To achieve this goal, treatment schedule may have to be highly individualized on the basis of the patient-specific potential vulnerability to adverse events. In this study, the concise and evidence-based review of current literature concerning the general rationales for combining radiotherapy and hormonal therapy, its mechanism, treatment results, and toxicity profile is presented.

Benefit of whole pelvic radiotherapy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for the high-risk prostate cancer.

AIM: To study whether use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (N-ADT) combined with whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) for high-risk prostate cancer patients was associated with survival benefit over prostate radiotherapy (PORT) only. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, 162 high-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with radiotherapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (L-ADT). Patients were prospectively assigned into two groups: A (N-ADT + WPRT + L-ADT) n = 70 pts, B (PORT + L-ADT) n = 92 pts. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) rates were 89% for A and 78% for B (P = .13). The 5-year actuarial cause specific survival (CSS) rates were A = 90% and B = 79% (P = .01). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) rates were 52% versus 40% (P = .07), for groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The WPRT combined with N-ADT compared to PORT for high-risk patients resulted in improvement in CSS and bPFS; however no OS benefit was observed.