Prostate Cancer Among Black Men in Canada.

Importance: Prostate cancer is a prevalent disease among men worldwide, exhibiting substantial heterogeneity in presentation and outcomes influenced by various factors, including race and ethnicity. Disparities in incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival rates have been observed between Black men and those of other races and ethnicities. Objective: To compare prostate cancer outcomes between Black men and men with other race (Asian, Hispanic, Indigenous, Middle Eastern, White, Multiracial, and Other) in a universal health care system, with race and ethnicity self-reported. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between June 1, 2014, and August 28, 2023, who self-identified race and ethnicity. Participants included men who had been prospectively enrolled in the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative from the 2 major urology referral centers in Alberta (University of Alberta and University of Calgary). All men with prostate cancer enrolled in the initiative were included. Exposure: Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the stage and grade of prostate cancer at diagnosis. Further outcomes included age and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, initial treatment modality, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survivals. Results: A total of 6534 men were included; 177 (2.7%) were Black, and 6357 (97.3%) had another race or ethnicity. Men who identified as Black were diagnosed with prostate cancer at an earlier age (mean [SD], 62.0 [8.2] compared with 64.6 [7.7] years; P < .001) and had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index rating (14% compared with 7% ≤ 1; P < .001) compared with men of other races. Men who identified as Black had similar prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, TNM category (74% vs 74% with T1-T2; P = .83) and Gleason Grade Group (34% compared with 35% Gleason Grade Group 1; P = .63). Black men had similar rates of prostate cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.41-2.97; P = .85), metastasis-free (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.42-1.46; P = .44), and overall (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.25-1.24; P = .15) survival. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that Black men, despite being diagnosed at a younger age, experience comparable prostate cancer outcomes compared with men of other races.

Micro-ultrasound for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with negative MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Despite a negative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), some patients may still harbor clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, Gleason grade group ≥2). High-resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a novel imaging technology that could visualize csPCa that is missed by MRI. METHODS: This retrospective review included 1011 consecutive patients biopsied between September 2021 and July 2023 in Alberta, Canada. Among them were 103 biopsy-naive patients with negative MRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System [PI-RADS] ≤2) undergoing microUS-informed prostate biopsy (n=56) scored using Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-ultrasound (PRI-MUS) or standard transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy (n=47). The primary outcome was detection rate of csPCa stratified by biopsy technique and PRI-MUS score. RESULTS: MicroUS biopsy identified csPCa in 14/56 (25%) compared to standard biopsy in 8/47 (17%) (p=0.33). Patients with lesions PRI-MUS ≥3 had csPCa detected at a higher rate compared to patients with PRI-MUS ≤2 (42% vs. 16%, p=0.03). The csPCa detection rate was significantly different comparing patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density <0.15 and PRI-MUS ≤2 compared to patients with PSA density ≥0.15 and PRI-MUS ≥3 (14% vs. 60%, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: MicroUS may aid in the detection of csPCa for patients with negative MRI.

Complication rates of ciprofloxacin alone vs. ciprofloxacin plus fosfomycin for transrectal prostate biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy have been increasing, driven in large part, by rates of antibiotic resistance to conventional prophylaxis, such as ciprofloxacin. This study was designed to compare conventional antibiotic prophylaxis (oral ciprofloxacin) with ciprofloxacin and fosfomycin combination therapy prior to biopsy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study looking at men between September 2021 and April 2023, who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy at several institutions in Alberta. The primary outcome was infectious complications within 30 days of prostate biopsy. Secondary outcomes included Clostridium difficile infections, urinary retention, gross hematuria, diarrhea, emergency room (ER ) visits, hospital admissions, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Data was collected on resistance patterns and pathogens isolated in culture. RESULTS: During the study period, 2168 men underwent transrectal prostate biopsy. A total of 1216 men received ciprofloxacin alone and 877 received fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin. Infectious complications were significantly higher in the ciprofloxacin alone group (5.8% vs. 0.5%, p<0.0001). Thirty-day complications (7.2% vs. 2.1%, p<0.0001), 30-day ER visits (7.1% vs. 1.8%, p<0.0001), and 30-day hospitalizations (2.7% vs. 0.7%, p<0.001) were all higher in the ciprofloxacin alone group. The most isolated pathogen was E. coli in 54/60 (90%). Ciprofloxacin resistance in the isolated pathogens was high, with 52/60 (87%) showing resistance to ciprofloxacin and 51/54 (94%) E. coli strains resistant. No difference was seen in retention, C. difficile infections, bleeding, or diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of fosfomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy was associated with significant improvement in infectious complications and healthcare utilization.

Value of Incremental Biopsy Cores for Microultrasound Targeted Prostate Biopsies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal number of cores needed during microultrasound-informed prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥2). METHODS: A retrospective review of 1011 consecutive patients between September 2021 and July 2023 at our institution were identified; 536 underwent microultrasound biopsy and 475 underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) targeted biopsy. Lesions were given a Prostate Risk Identification using Microultrasound (PRI-MUS) score, with lesions PRI-MUS ≥3 targeted. MRI lesions were scored with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and lesions PI-RADS ≥3 were targeted. The primary outcome is the detection of csPCa stratified by number of cores. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients underwent targeted biopsies for microultrasound only lesions, 182 for microultrasound and MRI lesions and 426 underwent MRI/US for MRI lesions. The first targeted core detected 78.0% (46/59), 77.8% (63/81), and 78.8% (216/274) of csPCa for microultrasound, microultrasound+MRI, and MRI/US, respectively. Comparing first to third core, there was not a significant difference in overall detection of csPCa by microultrasound, though MRI/US was significantly different (28.4% vs 36.4% P = .12, 32.5% vs 41.8% P = .06, 42.5% vs 53.9% P < .001 for microultrasound, microultrasound+MRI, and MRI/US, respectively). PI-RADS 3 and PRI-MUS 3 lesions had lower first core detection rates compared to PI-RADS 5 and PRI-MUS 5 lesions (44.4% vs 85.4% P = .01, 65.2% vs 81.4% P = .14, 60% vs 83.1% P = .07 for microultrasound, microultrasound+MRI, and MRI/US, respectively). CONCLUSION: A three-core targeted biopsy per microultrasound lesion improves detection rate of csPCa and should be considered to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Disparities in prostate cancer screening, diagnoses, management, and outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous men in a universal health care system.

BACKGROUND: Indigenous Peoples have higher morbidity rates and lower life expectancies than non-Indigenous Canadians. Identification of disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous men regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening, diagnoses, management, and outcomes was sought. METHODS: An observational cohort of men diagnosed with PCa between June 2014 and October 2022 was studied. Men were prospectively enrolled in the province-wide Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative. The primary outcomes were tumor characteristics (stage, grade, and prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were PSA testing rates, time from diagnosis to treatment, treatment modality, and metastasis-free, cancer-specific, and overall survivals. RESULTS: Examination of 1,444,974 men for whom aggregate PSA testing data were available was performed. Men in Indigenous communities were less likely to have PSA testing performed than men outside of Indigenous communities (32 vs. 46 PSA tests per 100 men [aged 50-70 years] within 1 year; p < .001). Among 6049 men diagnosed with PCa, Indigenous men had higher risk disease characteristics: a higher proportion of Indigenous men had PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL (48% vs. 30%; p < .01), TNM stage ≥ T2 (65% vs. 47%; p < .01), and Gleason grade group ≥ 2 (79% vs. 64%; p < .01) compared to non-Indigenous men. With a median follow-up of 40 months (interquartile range, 25-65 months), Indigenous men were at higher risk of developing PCa metastases (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2; p < .01) than non-Indigenous men. CONCLUSIONS: Despite receiving care in a universal health care system, Indigenous men were less likely to receive PSA testing and more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive tumors and develop PCa metastases than non-Indigenous men.

Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by micro-ultrasound-informed systematic biopsy during MRI/micro-ultrasound fusion biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: High-resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a novel imaging technique that may visualize clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), including those missed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ), in real time during prostate biopsy. METHODS: From September 2021 to January 2022, 75 consecutive biopsy-naive men were entered into an observational cohort. All men underwent an MRI /microUS fusion prostate biopsy, completed by a single surgeon using the ExactVU device. At time of biopsy, each biopsy core was given a Prostate Risk Identification using MicroUS (PRI-MUS) score. Anonymized data were entered into a RED Cap database. Cancer detection stratified by Prostate Imaging-Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS ) and PRI-MUS score, and imaging modality was captured. Our primary outcome was the detection rate of csPCa in microUS-informed systematic biopsy cores, taken outside MRI-visible lesions, during MRI /microUS fusion prostate biopsy. RESULTS: A median of three MRI-targeted and 12 microUS-informed systematic cores were taken per patient. MRI /microUS biopsy detected PCa in 84%, with csPCa detected in 52%. Of the 900 microUS-informed systematic cores, 105 cores were PRI-MUS ≥3 and 795 cores were PRI-MUS ≤2. csPCa was detected in 35% of the PRI-MUS ≥3 cores compared to 10% of the PRI-MUS ≤2 cores (p<0.0001). Detection of csPCa varied by core type: 8% of patients were diagnosed by MRI-targeted cores only, 38% were diagnosed by microUS-informed systematic cores only, and 54% were diagnosed by both. CONCLUSIONS: MicroUS-informed systematic biopsy may be a useful adjunct to MRI, with PRI-MUS ≥3 systematic cores having a 3.5-fold increased risk of csPCa compared to PRI-MUS ≤2 cores.