Alectinib - induced acute renal failure.

Introduction: Alectinib is a potent and selective orally active tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer, which has a better safety profile than other inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. We report a case of a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis proven by renal biopsy upon starting alectinib therapy. Case report: A 68-year-old man with diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia, diagnosed with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer stage IV, had 27 days previously started alectinib 600 mg twice daily. He presented at the emergency room due to vomiting, nausea, and more dyspnoea than usual. A high creatinine level and metabolic imbalances were detected in laboratory tests. Management and outcomes: After a diagnosis of acute renal failure, the patient was admitted to hospital. Nephrotoxic drugs were suspended, and haemodialysis was required. After dismissing other causes, a probable diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis due to alectinib was established. Corticotherapy was initiated and renal function returned to baseline levels. Renal biopsy showed a mixed pattern of acute interstitial nephritis and acute tubular necrosis. The patient was discharged, and alectinib therapy was modified to lorlatinib. No polymorphisms were found in a pharmacogenetic test. After 10 months with lorlatinib, renal function remains stable. Discussion: The relationship between acute renal failure and alectinib initiation is considered probable in this patient. Although it is an adverse effect reported in less than 1% of cases, it would be advisable to monitor renal function in this kind of patient.

Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in a Real-World Population with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

ICIs have been able to improve overall survival in advanced-stage lung cancer. The benefit of this therapy is limited in patients with poor ECOG PS. However, this scale is imprecise and can be influenced by different factors, such as frailty. Cancer patients have a high risk of frailty independently of age. In this observational, single-center, retrospective study, we investigated the effect of frailty on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab in first-line use in a cohort of 101 patients with metastatic NSCLC. Frailty was determined using a frailty score system developed by Sakakida et al. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic role of frailty on OS and PFS. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (23.8 vs. 7.0 and 1.8 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Median PFS was also significantly higher in patients with low frailty compared with intermediate and high frailty (10.5 vs. 3.9 and 1.6 months; p < 0.001, respectively). Frailty was the only variable that showed significant differences in OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis confirms frailty as an independent predictor of OS and PFS. Frailty assessment could help to select which patients are candidates for ICIs in NSCLC.

Subgroup Analysis in Pulmonary Hypertension-Specific Therapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) treatment decisions are driven by the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subgroup analyses are often performed to assess whether the intervention effect will change due to the patient's characteristics, thus allowing for individualized decisions. This review aimed to evaluate the appropriateness and interpretation of subgroup analyses performed in PH-specific therapy RCTs published between 2000 and 2020. Claims of subgroup effects were evaluated with prespecified criteria. Overall, 30 RCTs were included. Subgroup analyses presented: a high number of subgroup analyses reported, lack of prespecification, and lack of interaction tests. The trial protocol was not available for most RCTs; significant differences were found in those articles that published the protocol. Authors reported 13 claims of subgroup effect, with 12 claims meeting four or fewer of Sun's criteria. Even when most RCTs were generally at low risk of bias and were published in high-impact journals, the credibility and general quality of subgroup analyses and subgroup claims were low due to methodological flaws. Clinicians should be skeptical of claims of subgroup effects and interpret subgroup analyses with caution, as due to their poor quality, these analyses may not serve as guidance for personalized care.