Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0149100, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26872361

ABSTRACT

Bacterial pneumonia is the most common reason for parenteral antimicrobial administration to beef cattle in the United States. Yet there is little information describing the antimicrobial concentrations at the site of action. The objective of this study was to compare the active drug concentrations in the pulmonary epithelial lining fluid and interstitial fluid of four antimicrobials commonly used in cattle. After injection, plasma, interstitial fluid, and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid concentrations and protein binding were measured to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of each drug. A cross-over design with six calves per drug was used. Following sample collection and drug analysis, pharmacokinetic calculations were performed. For enrofloxacin and metabolite ciprofloxacin, the interstitial fluid concentration was 52% and 78% of the plasma concentration, while pulmonary fluid concentrations was 24% and 40% of the plasma concentration, respectively. The pulmonary concentrations (enrofloxacin + ciprofloxacin combined) exceeded the MIC90 of 0.06 µg/mL at 48 hours after administration. For florfenicol, the interstitial fluid concentration was almost 98% of the plasma concentration, and the pulmonary concentrations were over 200% of the plasma concentrations, exceeding the breakpoint (≤ 2 µg/mL), and the MIC90 for Mannheimia haemolytica (1.0 µg/mL) for the duration of the study. For ceftiofur, penetration to the interstitial fluid was only 5% of the plasma concentration. Pulmonary epithelial lining fluid concentration represented 40% of the plasma concentration. Airway concentrations exceeded the MIC breakpoint for susceptible respiratory pathogens (≤ 2 µg/mL) for a short time at 48 hours after administration. The plasma and interstitial fluid concentrations of tulathromcyin were lower than the concentrations in pulmonary fluid throughout the study. The bronchial concentrations were higher than the plasma or interstitial concentrations, with over 900% penetration to the airways. Despite high diffusion into the bronchi, the tulathromycin concentrations achieved were lower than the MIC of susceptible bacteria at most time points.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Extracellular Fluid/metabolism , Respiratory Mucosa/metabolism , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Biological Availability , Cattle , Cephalosporins/blood , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Over Studies , Disaccharides/blood , Disaccharides/pharmacokinetics , Enrofloxacin , Extracellular Fluid/chemistry , Fluoroquinolones/blood , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacokinetics , Heterocyclic Compounds/blood , Heterocyclic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Lung/metabolism , Male , Mannheimia haemolytica/drug effects , Mannheimia haemolytica/growth & development , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Thiamphenicol/analogs & derivatives , Thiamphenicol/blood , Thiamphenicol/pharmacokinetics , Veterinary Drugs/blood , Veterinary Drugs/pharmacokinetics
3.
Res Vet Sci ; 97(3): 611-5, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25468800

ABSTRACT

Collection of fluid from the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract is commonly necessary for research projects, but presents challenges including intestinal motility and potential for leakage of intestinal contents. In this study, ultrafiltration collection devices were surgically implanted in the ileum and spiral colon of 12 steers for repeated collection of intestinal fluid over 48 hours. There were no significant complications associated with surgery or during the post-operative period, nor were there any significant pathologic changes found at necropsy 3 or 4 days post-surgery. Over 48 hours, we obtained 88% of the desired 212 samples. Only two devices failed to routinely collect samples. Use of ultrafiltration probes is a novel, consistent and humane method to repeatedly sample the gastrointestinal contents.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Colon/surgery , Ileum/surgery , Intestinal Secretions , Specimen Handling/veterinary , Ultrafiltration/instrumentation , Animals , Cattle , Specimen Handling/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...