Patient Safety and Suitability for Primary Cleft Lip Repair as Day Case Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if day case cleft lip surgery has an impact on complications and 30-day readmission rate. DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Databases included; PubMed, Science Direct, Ovid and Cochrane. Search terms; "Day Case", "Day Care", "outpatient", "Ambulatory" AND "Cleft", "Cleft Lip". Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. SETTING: Eligible study types included; randomised controlled trials, observational studies (prospective and retrospective) and case series. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Paediatric patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair. INTERVENTIONS: Day case surgery versus inpatient admission post-operative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measure: Primary cleft lip repair performed as a day case in paediatric patients. Secondary outcome measures: 1. Complication rates and 30-day re-admission to hospital rate. 2. Patient suitability for day case surgery. RESULTS: Ten papers with 13 804 patients undergoing primary cleft lip repair were included, 28% were discharged on the day of surgery (Range 17%-81%). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the inpatient and day case cohorts. There was a significant reduction in 30-day readmission rates in the day case cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis indicates there is no difference in complication rates for patients discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted overnight. Complications encountered were infrequent, non-life threatening and often occurred more than 24 h following discharge. There was an observed reduction in 30-day readmission rates for day-case patients. This is likely to represent a variation in baseline characteristics which deemed them suitable for day case surgery pre-operatively.

The role of primary surgery in the management of orofacial clefting.

Primary cleft surgery refers to the planned surgical procedure(s) necessary to reconstruct an orofacial defect according to a specified protocol; in the context of a unilateral cleft lip and palate, this would include lip repair (with vomer flap closure of the hard palate), subsequent repair of the residual soft palate cleft and finally, the alveolar bone graft. This paper will provide an overview of the goals of primary surgical reconstruction, including the utility of pre-surgical orthopaedic techniques, including nasoalveolar moulding. The surgical methods of primary lip repair in both unilateral and bilateral clefts will be outlined and the concept of a primary rhinoplasty will be introduced. The principal techniques of cleft palate reconstruction will be delineated for a variety of cleft phenotypes. The final element of the primary reconstructive sequence is the alveolar bone graft using cancellous bone harvested from the iliac crest at approximately 8-10 years of age. The role of optimising oral hygiene prior to bone grafting cannot be over-emphasised and the utility of pre-surgical orthodontic arch expansion is also discussed. In the UK, bone graft outcomes are audited using the Kindelan score, which is evaluated from the six-month postoperative upper standard occlusal radiograph.

Secondary surgery techniques to optimise functional and aesthetic outcomes in orofacial clefting.

Although the goal of primary surgery is to avoid the need for secondary surgery, in a proportion of patients this is not always possible. Secondary, or revisional, surgery is frequently undertaken in patients with orofacial clefts and may present a complex and challenging problem for the multidisciplinary team. There are a broad range of functional and aesthetic issues that secondary surgery might aim to address. These include palatal fistulae (that may be symptomatic for air, fluid or food), velopharyngeal insufficiency (typically manifesting with decreased intelligibility or nasal regurgitation), suboptimal cleft lip scars (that can significantly impact upon the psychosocial wellbeing of the patient), and nasal asymmetry (that is frequently accompanied by nasal airway concerns). Unilateral and bilateral clefts are each associated with a characteristic nasal deformity that requires a tailored surgical approach. Suboptimal maxillary growth in repaired orofacial clefts may impact negatively on both appearance and function; surgical correction through orthognathic surgery can be transformational for the patient. The general dental practitioner, cleft orthodontist and restorative dentist all play a critical role in this process.

An essential overview of orofacial clefting.

An appreciation of the embryologic development of the face is essential to understanding the anatomic variation observed in this phenotypically broad condition. Embryologically, the nose, lip and palate are separated into the primary and secondary palate, which are divided anatomically by the incisive foramen. The epidemiology of orofacial clefting is reviewed together with the contemporaneous cleft classification systems that enable comparisons to be made between international centres for audit and research purposes. A detailed examination of the clinical anatomy of the lip and palate informs the surgical priorities for the primary reconstruction of both form and function. The pathophysiology of the submucous cleft palate is also explored. The seismic impact of the 1998 Clinical Standards Advisory Group report on the organisation of UK cleft care provision is outlined. The importance of the Cleft Registry and Audit Network database in auditing UK cleft outcomes is highlighted. The potential for the Cleft Collective study to establish the causes of clefting, the optimal treatment protocols, and the impact of cleft on patients is tremendously exciting for all health care professionals involved in the management of this challenging congenital deformity.

Unusual wound with increasing prevalence caused by artificial fingernail glue.

Clinical introductionA healthy 17-year-old girl presents with a wound on her left medial thigh (figure 1). Two days earlier while applying acrylic nail tips, she spilled nail glue on her jeans in the area of concern. Despite noticing an immediate irritable sensation, she did not perform any first aid nor did she remove her clothing to check the underlying skin.emermed;39/3/185/F1F1F1Figure 1Wound left medial thigh. QUESTION: What is the pathological process of this wound?De-epithelialisation due to removal of clothing glued to skin.Chemical burn.Partial thickness thermal burn.Allergic reaction to nail glue. For answer see page 02.