More difficult still: Treating severe rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia.

We present the case of a male patient with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, with simultaneous onset of p-ANCA positive rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. We discuss the different therapeutic possibilities, emphasising the appropriateness of their administration according to the time in the course of the infection.

Más difícil todavía: tratar una glomerulonefritis rápidamente progresiva grave en el seno de una neumonía por COVID-19 / More difficult still: Treating severe rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia

Presentamos el caso de un varón afecto por neumonía SARS-CoV-2 grave, que a la vez comienza con una glomerulonefritis rápidamente progresiva p-ANCA positiva. Se comentan las distintas posibilidades terapéuticas haciendo hincapié en la idoneidad de su administración según el momento evolutivo de la infección. (AU)

We present the case of a male patient with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, with simultaneous onset of p-ANCA positive rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. We discuss the different therapeutic possibilities, emphasising the appropriateness of their administration according to the time in the course of the infection. (AU)

Acute kidney injury in 3182 patients admitted with COVID-19: a single-center, retrospective, case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) may develop in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and may be associated with a worse outcome. The aim of this study is to describe AKI incidence during the first 45 days of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in Spain, its reversibility and the association with mortality. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective case-control study based on patients hospitalized between 1 March and 15 April 2020 with SARS-CoV-2 infection and AKI. Confirmed AKI cases were compared with stable kidney function patients for baseline characteristics, analytical data, treatment and renal outcome. Patients with end-stage kidney disease were excluded. RESULTS: AKI incidence was 17.22% among 3182 admitted COVID-19 patients and acute kidney disease (AKD) incidence was 6.82%. The most frequent causes of AKI were prerenal (68.8%) and sepsis (21.9%). Odds ratio (OR) for AKI was increased in patients with pre-existent hypertension [OR 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-3.89] and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.33-3.42) and in those with respiratory distress (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.52-3.70). Low arterial pressure at admission increased the risk for Stage 3 AKI (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50). Baseline kidney function was not recovered in 45.73% of overall AKI cases and in 52.75% of AKI patients with prior CKD. Mortality was 38.5% compared with 13.4% of the overall sample population. AKI increased mortality risk at any time of hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: AKI is frequent in COVID-19 patients and is associated with mortality, independently of acute respiratory distress syndrome. AKD was also frequent and merits adequate follow-up.

More difficult still: Treating severe rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in the context of COVID-19 pneumonia. / Más difícil todavía: tratar una glomerulonefritis rápidamente progresiva grave en el seno de una neumonía por COVID-19.

We present the case of a male patient with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, with simultaneous onset of p-ANCA positive rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. We discuss the different therapeutic possibilities, emphasising the appropriateness of their administration according to the time in the course of the infection.

Systemic thrombosis in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients despite thromboprophylaxis: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Incidence of thrombotic events associated to Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is difficult to assess and reported rates differ significantly. Optimal thromboprophylaxis is unclear. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to analyze the characteristics of patients with a confirmed thrombotic complication including inflammatory and hemostatic parameters, compare patients affected by arterial vs venous events and examine differences between survivors and non-survivors. We reviewed compliance with thromboprophylaxis and explored how the implementation of a severity-adjusted protocol could have influenced outcome. METHODS: Single-cohort retrospective study of COVID-19 patients admitted, from March 3 to May 3 2020, to the Infanta Leonor University Hospital in Madrid, epicenter of the Spanish outbreak. RESULTS: Among 1127 patients, 80 thrombotic events were diagnosed in 69 patients (6.1% of the entire cohort). Forty-three patients (62%) suffered venous thromboembolism, 18 (26%) arterial episodes and 6 (9%) concurrent venous and arterial thrombosis. Most patients (90%) with a confirmed thrombotic complication where under low-molecular-weight heparin treatment. Overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was rare. Initial ISTH DIC score and pre-event CRP were significantly higher among non-survivors. In multivariate analysis, arterial localization was an independent predictor of mortality (OR = 18, 95% CI: 2.4-142, p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite quasi-universal thromboprophylaxis, COVID-19 lead to a myriad of arterial and venous thrombotic events. Considering the subgroup of patients with thrombotic episodes, arterial events appeared earlier in the course of disease and conferred very poor prognosis, and an ISTH DIC score ≥ 3 at presentation was identified as a potential predictor of mortality. Severity-adjusted thromboprophylaxis seemed to decrease the number of events and could have influenced mortality. Randomized controlled trials are eagerly awaited.

Infarto renal en paciente con infección activa por COVID-19 / Renal infarction in a patient with active COVID -19 infection

No disponible

La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis / Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid

La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis (HD) se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis (LD). INTRODUCCIÓN: Concentraciones bajas de magnesio (Mg) en sangre se han relacionado con el desarrollo de diabetes, hipertensión arterial, arritmias, calcificaciones vasculares y con mayor riesgo de muerte, en población general y en hemodiálisis. La composición del LD y su concentración de Mg es uno de los principales determinantes de la magnesemia en los pacientes en HD. OBJETIVO: Estudiar las concentraciones de magnesio en los pacientes en HD, su valor predictivo de mortalidad y qué factores se asocian a la hipomagnesemia y mortalidad en HD. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de una cohorte de pacientes prevalentes en HD seguidos 2 años. Cada 6 meses se determina el Mg sérico. En el análisis se utiliza el Mg inicial y el medio de cada paciente, comparando los pacientes con Mg por debajo de la media, 2,1mg/dl, con los que están por encima. Durante el seguimiento se han utilizado 3 tipos de LD: tipo 1, magnesio de 0,5 mmol/l y tipo 3, Mg 0,37 mmol/l ambos con acetato y tipo 2, 0,5 mmol/l de Mg con citrato. RESULTADOS: Se han incluido en el estudio 137 pacientes en hemodiálisis, 72 hombres y 65 mujeres, con una edad media de 67(15) [26-95] años. Cincuenta y siete pacientes eran diabéticos y 70 pacientes estaban en hemodiafiltración en línea (HDF-OL) y 67 en hemodiálisis de alto flujo (HD-HF). El Mg medio de los 93 pacientes con LD tipo 1 era: 2,18(0,37) mg/dl, en 27 con el tipo 3: 2,02 (0,42) mg/dl y los 17 con tipo 2: 1,84 (0,24)mg/dl (p = 0,01). El Mg se relaciona de forma directa significativa con el P y con la albúmina. Después de un seguimiento medio de 16,6(8,9)[3-24] meses, 77 seguían activos, 24 habían fallecido y 36 se habían trasplantado o trasladado. Los pacientes con un Mg superior a 2,1mg/dl tienen una supervivencia mayor, p = 0,008. La supervivencia de los pacientes con los tres tipos de LD no difería significativamente, Log-Rank, p = 0,424. Corregido por la magnesemia, los pacientes con LD con citrato tienen mejor supervivencia, p = 0,009. En el análisis de regresión de COX se observa cómo la edad, albúmina sérica, Mg, técnica de diálisis y tipo de LD tienen valor predictivo de mortalidad independiente. CONCLUSIONES: Los magnesios séricos bajos respecto a los altos se asocian a mayor riesgo de mortalidad. El tipo de LD influye en la concentración de Mg y en el riesgo de muerte

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid (DF). INTRODUCTION: Low concentrations of magnesium (Mg) in blood have been linked to the development of diabetes, hypertension, arrhythmias, vascular calcifications and an increased risk of death in the general population and in haemodialysis patients. The composition of the dialysis fluid in terms of its magnesium concentration is one of the main determinants of magnesium in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To study magnesium concentrations in haemodialysis patients, their predictive mortality rate and what factors are associated with hypomagnesaemia and mortality in haemodialysis. METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of prevalent haemodialysis patients followed up for two years. Serum magnesium was measured every six months. The analysis used the initial and average magnesium values for each patient, comparing patients with magnesium below the mean (2.1mg/dl) with those with magnesium above the mean. During the follow-up, three types of dialysis fluid were used: type 1, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l; type 3, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l (both with acetate); and type 2, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l with citrate. RESULTS: We included 137 haemodialysis patients in the study, of which 72 were male and 65 were female, with a mean age of 67 (15) [26-95] years old. Of this group, 57 patients were diabetic, 70 were on online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and 67 were on high-flow haemodialysis (HF-HD). The mean magnesium of the 93 patients with dialysis fluid type 1 was 2.18 (0.37) mg/dl. In the 27 patients with dialysis fluid type 3 it was 2.02 (0.42) mg/dl. And in the 17 with dialysis fluid type 2 it was 1.84 (0.24) mg/dl (p=.01). There was a pronounced direct relationship between Mg and P and albumin. After a mean follow-up of 16.6 (8.9) [3-24] months, 77 remained active, 24 had died and 36 had been transplanted or transferred. Patients with magnesium above than 2.1mg/dl had a longer survival (p=.008). The survival of patients with the three types of dialysis fluid did not differ significantly (Log-Rank, p=.424). Corrected for blood magnesium, patients with dialysis fluid with citrate have better survival (p=.009). The COX regression analysis shows how age, serum albumin, magnesium, dialysis technique and type of dialysis fluid have an independent predictive mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum magnesium levels have a greater association with an increased risk of mortality compared to high levels. The type of dialysis fluid affects the magnesium concentration and the risk of death

Glomerulonefritis necrosante en un paciente con VIH, VHC y leishmaniasis visceral / Necrotizing glomerulonephritis in patients with HIV, HCV and visceral leishmaniasis

No disponible

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid. / La hipomagnesemia en hemodiálisis se asocia a mayor riesgo de mortalidad: su relación con el líquido de diálisis.

Hypomagnesaemia in haemodialysis (HD) is associated with increased mortality risk: its relationship with dialysis fluid (DF). INTRODUCTION: Low concentrations of magnesium (Mg) in blood have been linked to the development of diabetes, hypertension, arrhythmias, vascular calcifications and an increased risk of death in the general population and in haemodialysis patients. The composition of the dialysis fluid in terms of its magnesium concentration is one of the main determinants of magnesium in haemodialysis patients. OBJECTIVE: To study magnesium concentrations in haemodialysis patients, their predictive mortality rate and what factors are associated with hypomagnesaemia and mortality in haemodialysis. METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of prevalent haemodialysis patients followed up for two years. Serum magnesium was measured every six months. The analysis used the initial and average magnesium values for each patient, comparing patients with magnesium below the mean (2.1mg/dl) with those with magnesium above the mean. During the follow-up, three types of dialysis fluid were used: type 1, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l; type 3, magnesium 0.37 mmol/l (both with acetate); and type 2, magnesium 0.5 mmol/l with citrate. RESULTS: We included 137 haemodialysis patients in the study, of which 72 were male and 65 were female, with a mean age of 67 (15) [26-95] years old. Of this group, 57 patients were diabetic, 70 were on online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and 67 were on high-flow haemodialysis (HF-HD). The mean magnesium of the 93 patients with dialysis fluid type 1 was 2.18 (0.37) mg/dl. In the 27 patients with dialysis fluid type 3 it was 2.02 (0.42) mg/dl. And in the 17 with dialysis fluid type 2 it was 1.84 (0.24) mg/dl (p=.01). There was a pronounced direct relationship between Mg and P and albumin. After a mean follow-up of 16.6 (8.9) [3-24] months, 77 remained active, 24 had died and 36 had been transplanted or transferred. Patients with magnesium above than 2.1mg/dl had a longer survival (p=.008). The survival of patients with the three types of dialysis fluid did not differ significantly (Log-Rank, p=.424). Corrected for blood magnesium, patients with dialysis fluid with citrate have better survival (p=.009). The COX regression analysis shows how age, serum albumin, magnesium, dialysis technique and type of dialysis fluid have an independent predictive mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Low serum magnesium levels have a greater association with an increased risk of mortality compared to high levels. The type of dialysis fluid affects the magnesium concentration and the risk of death.

Inmunosupresión como desencadenante de un síndrome de hiperinfestación por Strongyloides stercolaris en la nefropatía membranosa / Immunosuppression as a trigger for hyperinflammatory syndrome due to Strongyloides stercolaris in membranous nephropathy

La relación entre parásitos y glomerulonefritis (GN) está bien documentada en determinadas parasitosis, no así en casos de Strongyloides stercolaris (S. stercolaris), donde hay pocos casos descritos, siendo la mayoría GN de cambios mínimos. Reportamos un caso de hiperinfestación por S. stercolaris en un paciente afectado de una GN membranosa tratado con corticoides por vía oral con resultado fatal para el paciente. Este caso nos aporta una doble enseñanza: en primer lugar, acerca de una asociación rara de estrongiloidiasis y GN membranosa, y en segundo lugar, sobre la importancia de establecer un diagnóstico de sospecha y tratamiento adecuados ante determinadas infecciones o enfermedades con poca expresividad clínica antes de iniciar cualquier tratamiento inmunosupresor

The relationship between parasites and glomerulonephritis (GN) is well documented in certain parasitoses, but not in cases of Strongyloides stercolaris (S. stercolaris) where there are few cases described being the majority GN of minimal changes. We report a case of hyperinfestation by S. stercolaris in a patient affected by a membranous GN treated with oral corticosteroids with fatal outcome for the patient. This case provides a double teaching: first about a rare association of strongyloid and membranous GN and second about the importance of establishing a diagnosis of suspected and appropriate treatment for certain infections or diseases with little clinical expression before starting any immunosuppressive treatment