Incidental mobile aortic valve lesion: a case of aortic valve fenestration.

The case is reported of a 72-year-old patient with a mobile aortic valve lesion discovered incidentally by echocardiography performed in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Definitive identification of this lesion was not possible by transthoracic echocardiography or transesophageal echocardiography alone. Pathological examination of the excised aortic valve led to a diagnosis of aortic valve fenestration (AVF) bridging strand rupture. AVFs are common, usually asymptomatic, and of little clinical significance. However, rupture of a bridging strand can produce aortic insufficiency and require surgical correction.

Left atrial papillary fibroelastoma: a rare cause of multiple cerebral emboli.

Papillary fibroelastomas have been increasingly described since the widespread use of cardiac echocardiography. Most often diagnosed incidentally, papillary fibroelastomas may embolize, mainly to the cerebral circulation. The aortic valve is predominantly affected. The left ventricle is the most frequent nonvalvular location. We present a case of a 59-year-old man who had recurrent episodes of cerebral ischemic attacks and required coronary artery bypass surgery. The overall neurologic investigation was normal, including a transthoracic echocardiography. A 5 x 5 mm pedunculated, mobile mass was described on the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. The excision was performed through the left atrial appendage during the coronary artery bypass surgery. The microscopic examination demonstrated a papillary fibroelastoma. The unusual localization and management of papillary fibroelastomas are discussed.

Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Recommendations of the Cardiovascular Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

PURPOSE: To establish Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: Guidelines were established by the Canadian Perioperative Echocardiography Group with the support of the cardiovascular section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society in conjunction with the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. Guidelines for training in echocardiography by the American Society of Echocardiography, the American College of Cardiology and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists were reviewed, modified and expanded to produce the 2003 Quebec expert consensus for training in perioperative echocardiography. The Quebec expert consensus and the 2005 guidelines for the provision of echocardiography in Canada formed the basis of the Canadian training guidelines in adult perioperative TEE. RESULTS: Basic, advanced and director levels of expertise were identified. The total number of echocardiographic examinations to achieve each level of expertise remains unchanged from the 2002 American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists guidelines. The increased proportion of examinations personally performed at basic and advanced levels, as well as the level of autonomy at the basic level suggested by the Quebec expert consensus are retained. These examinations may be performed in a perioperative setting and are not limited to intraoperative TEE. Training 'on-the-job', the role of the perioperative TEE examination, the requirements for maintenance of competence and the duration of training are also discussed for each level of training. The components of a TEE report and comprehensive TEE examination are also outlined. CONCLUSION: The Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative TEE reflect the unique Canadian practice profile in perioperative TEE and address the training requirements to obtain expertise in this field.

Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Recommendations of the Cardiovascular Section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography.

PURPOSE: To establish Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: Guidelines were established by the Canadian Perioperative Echocardiography Group with the support of the cardiovascular section of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS) in conjunction with the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. Guidelines for training in echocardiography by the American Society of Echocardiography, the American College of Cardiology and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists were reviewed, modified and expanded to produce the 2003 Quebec expert consensus for training in perioperative echocardiography. The Quebec expert consensus and the 2005 Guidelines for the provision of echocardiography in Canada formed the basis of the Canadian training guidelines in adult perioperative TEE. RESULTS: Basic, advanced and director levels of expertise were identified. The total number of echocardiographic examinations to achieve each level of expertise remains unchanged from the 2002 American Society of Echocardiography-Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists guidelines. The increased proportion of examinations personally performed at basic and advanced levels, and the level of autonomy at the basic level suggested by the Quebec expert consensus are retained. These examinations can be performed in a perioperative setting and are not limited to intraoperative TEE. Training "on the job", the role of the perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination, requirements for maintenance of competence, and duration of training are also discussed for each level of training. The components of a TEE report and comprehensive TEE examination are also outlined. CONCLUSION: The Canadian guidelines for training in adult perioperative TEE reflect the unique Canadian practice profile in perioperative TEE and address the training requirements to obtain expertise in this field.

Expert consensus for training in perioperative echocardiography in the province of Quebec.

PURPOSE: Establish an expert consensus for training in perioperative echocardiography in the province of Quebec. METHODS: Cardiac anesthesiologists practicing in the province of Quebec with expertise in echocardiography were involved in the development of a multicentre expert consensus on training in perioperative echocardiography. Guidelines for training in adult echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography and perioperative echocardiography by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and/or the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) were reviewed. RESULTS: A basic, advanced and director level of expertise were identified for training in perioperative echocardiography. The total number of echocardiographic examinations to achieve each of these levels of expertise remains unchanged from the 2002 ASE-SCA guidelines. However, the recommended proportion of examinations performed personally is increased in the Quebec expert consensus for both the basic and the advanced level of training to ensure proficiency in echocardiography while providing anesthesia care to the patient. A level of autonomy in perioperative echocardiography is also identified in the basic level of training as defined in the Quebec expert consensus. Maintenance of competence, certification in the perioperative transesophageal echocardiography (PTE) examination and duration of training are outlined for each of the three levels of training in the Quebec expert consensus but are not part of the recent 2002 ASE-SCA guidelines. CONCLUSION: Adequate perioperative echocardiographic training is an important aspect of cardiovascular anesthesia. The ACC, ASE and SCA guidelines for training in echocardiography were modified to reflect the expert consensus of anesthesiologists in the province of Quebec.

Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of carbon dioxide embolism during minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting and treatment with inhaled epoprostenol.

IMPLICATIONS: We describe a patient scheduled for coronary artery bypass who developed carbon dioxide (CO2) embolism with acute pulmonary hypertension during endoscopic saphenectomy. Transesophageal echocardiography was useful in the diagnosis of CO2 embolism and to assess response to inhaled epoprostenol.