Optimization of contrast material administration for coronary CT angiography using a software-based test-bolus evaluation algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of a prototype circulation time-based test bolus evaluation algorithm for the individualized optimal timing of contrast media (CM) delivery in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA). METHODS: Thirty-two patients (62 ± 16 years) underwent CCTA using a prototype bolus evaluation tool to determine the optimal time-delay for CM administration. Contrast attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), objective, and subjective image quality were evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results were compared to a control cohort (matched for age, sex, body mass index, and tube voltage) of patients who underwent CCTA using the generic test bolus peak attenuation +4 s protocol as scan delay. RESULTS: In the study group, the mean time delay to CCTA acquisition was significantly longer (26.0 ± 2.9 s) compared to the control group (23.1 ± 3.5 s; p < 0.01). In the study group, SNR improvement was seen in the right coronary artery (17.5 vs 13; p = 0.028), the left main (15.3 vs 12.3; p = 0.027), and the left anterior descending artery (18.5 vs 14.1; p = 0.048). Subjective image quality was rated higher in the study group (4.75 ± 0.7 vs 3.64 ± 0.5; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prototype test bolus evaluation algorithm provided a reliable patient-specific scan delay for CCTA that ensured homogenous vascular attenuation, improvement in objective and subjective image quality, and avoidance of beam hardening artifacts. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The prototype contrast bolus evaluation and optimization tool estimated circulation time-based time-delay improves the overall quality of CCTA.

Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Platform Against Clinical Radiology Reports for the Evaluation of Noncontrast Chest CT.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Research on implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology workflows and its impact on reports remains scarce. In this study, we aim to assess if an AI platform would perform better than clinical radiology reports in evaluating noncontrast chest computed tomography (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone noncontrast chest CT were retrospectively identified. The radiology reports were reviewed in a binary fashion for reporting of pulmonary lesions, pulmonary emphysema, aortic dilatation, coronary artery calcifications (CAC), and vertebral compression fractures (VCF). CT scans were then processed using an AI platform. The reports' findings and the AI results were subsequently compared to a consensus read by two board-certificated radiologists as reference. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (mean age: 64.2 ± 14.8 years; 57% males) were included in this study. Aortic segmentation and calcium quantification failed to be processed by AI in 2 and 3 cases, respectively. AI showed superior diagnostic performance in identifying aortic dilatation (AI: sensitivity: 96.3%, specificity: 81.4%, AUC: 0.89) vs (Reports: sensitivity: 25.9%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 0.63), p <0.001; and CAC (AI: sensitivity: 89.8%, specificity: 100, AUC: 0.95) vs (Reports: sensitivity: 75.4%, specificity: 94.9%, AUC: 0.85), p = 0.005. Reports had better performance than AI in identifying pulmonary lesions (Reports: sensitivity: 97.6%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 0.99) vs (AI: sensitivity: 92.8%, specificity: 82.4%, AUC: 0.88), p = 0.024; and VCF (Reports: sensitivity:100%, specificity: 100%, AUC: 1.0) vs (AI: sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 63.7%, AUC: 0.82), p <0.001. A comparable diagnostic performance was noted in identifying pulmonary emphysema on AI (sensitivity: 80.6%, specificity: 66.7%. AUC: 0.74) and reports (sensitivity: 74.2%, specificity: 97.1%, AUC: 0.86), p = 0.064. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that incorporating AI support platforms into radiology workflows can provide significant added value to clinical radiology reporting.

Machine Learning/Deep Neuronal Network: Routine Application in Chest Computed Tomography and Workflow Considerations.

The constantly increasing number of computed tomography (CT) examinations poses major challenges for radiologists. In this article, the additional benefits and potential of an artificial intelligence (AI) analysis platform for chest CT examinations in routine clinical practice will be examined. Specific application examples include AI-based, fully automatic lung segmentation with emphysema quantification, aortic measurements, detection of pulmonary nodules, and bone mineral density measurement. This contribution aims to appraise this AI-based application for value-added diagnosis during routine chest CT examinations and explore future development perspectives.