Predictive Importance of Social Contacts on U.S. Veteran Suicide Safety Plans.

OBJECTIVE: Safety planning is a suicide prevention intervention that relies partly on an individual's social relationships as distractions during or help in a suicidal crisis. The primary objectives of this study were to estimate rates of missingness on social aspects of safety plans to determine whether rates differ by demographic characteristics and diagnoses and to examine whether missing social contacts on safety plans may affect clinical outcomes. METHODS: Data were drawn from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System's electronic medical record (N=1,602 individuals) from 2018 to 2021. Safety plans were coded according to the absence of listed distraction or help contacts, and clinical records of suicide attempts, suicide deaths, and use of crisis services were recorded for 1 year after completion of the safety plan. RESULTS: In total, 30% of plans lacked a contact for distraction or help. Male veterans were less likely to have a distraction contact listed, and veterans identifying as Hispanic or Latino were more likely to have a help contact listed. The lack of a help contact (odds ratio [OR]=2.11) and having neither distraction nor help contacts (OR=2.45) were associated with a markedly higher risk for next-year suicide attempt or death. The lack of a help contact was associated with increased odds of a next-year psychiatric inpatient hospitalization (OR=1.90) and an emergency department visit (OR=1.88). CONCLUSIONS: A lack of social contacts on safety plans may be a potential indicator for increased suicide risk among veterans.

Suicide-Focused Group Therapy.

Background: Although there are several studies focusing on group models for therapy specific to suicidal thoughts and behaviors, scoping reviews providing an overview of these studies' findings are limited. Aims: The aim of this paper was to conduct a scoping review of group therapies that explicitly target suicidal thoughts and behaviors (i.e., suicide-focused) for adults and their suicide-related outcomes. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to identify relevant records published between 2000 and 2021 as well as a review of reference lists from relevant records was conducted. Results: There were 14 records identified with 12 unique suicide-focused group therapies. Even with variable methodological designs, sample sizes (M = 136, SD = 98), and population targeted, all records showed reductions in suicide-related outcomes by the end of the therapy; although most were not powered to determine effectiveness. Limitations: This review only included records written in English and excluded support groups that were led by peers as the focus was on therapy groups and gray literature. Conclusions: There are few evaluated therapy groups that explicitly address suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Available data indicate suicide-focused group therapy are generally feasible, acceptable, and may reduce suicidal-related outcomes. This is encouraging for future research; recommendations to include randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of suicide-focused group therapy are discussed.

A peer approach to suicide prevention and recovery: Study protocol for a feasibility and acceptability trial of Caring Cards for veterans.

Introduction: There is a need to develop, evaluate, and implement interventions that reduce Veteran suicide. Caring Cards (CC) is a novel intervention that integrates aspects of caring contacts and peers (i.e., persons with lived mental health experience). In CC, Veterans meet in a weekly group to create hope-filled cards that are sent to Veterans with mental health concerns. This study will examine feasibility and acceptability of CC with Veterans with a history of and current elevated suicide risk via in-person and virtual modalities and preliminarily evaluate pre/post changes on suicide-specific outcomes. Methods: This 2-year open-trial study will employ a pre/post research design. Recruited Veterans with a history of suicide risk (n = 30) will make up CC groups (card makers) and Veterans currently at high-risk for suicide (n = 50) will be card recipients. Feasibility and acceptability (recruitment, retention, attendance, card receipt rates, and satisfaction questionnaire responses) and pre/post changes on suicide-specific outcomes (i.e., thwarted belonginess, perceived burdensomeness, social connectedness, suicidal ideation, and behavior) will be evaluated. Groups will meet weekly for 90-120 min for three to six months; card recipients will receive one card per month for six months. Discussion: This study builds on preliminary data which indicate Veterans are interested in and find participating in CC highly meaningful. This study is innovative as it will target two new Veteran populations and use both in-person and virtual modalities. If feasible and acceptable, a large-scale efficacy trial will be conducted to further examine CC as a suicide prevention intervention for Veterans.

Crisis service utilization following completion of a suicide safety plan for Veterans with and without affective and nonaffective psychosis.

OBJECTIVE: Psychosis is associated with increased suicide risk. Safety planning is a suicide prevention practice that is associated with decreased suicidal behavior and psychiatric hospitalizations. A common feature of safety planning is listing of crisis line numbers. The primary purpose of this study was to compare Veterans with and without psychosis who completed a safety plan in terms of their next year crisis service use, including Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) calls, and suicidal behavior. METHODS: Data were drawn from the VA San Diego's electronic medical record system for (N = 1602) safety plans from 2018 to 2021. Clinical records of crisis services and suicide attempt/death were recorded for one year after the safety plan. RESULTS: Following completion of a safety plan, Veterans with psychosis were more likely to have a next year psychiatric hospitalization (OR = 4.1), emergency department visit (OR = 2.3), and psychiatric emergency clinic visit (OR = 2.2) than those without psychosis. In contrast, there were no group differences in likelihood of calling the VCL. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with psychosis who recently completed a safety plan do not show elevated rates of VCL use that are commensurate with increases in crisis service use. Interventions for this high-risk group may focus on understanding the motivation and ability to call the VCL as ways to enhance safety planning.