ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A survey conducted by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) revealed significant differences in the surgical training of the ophthalmology residents in Europe, including a disparity between the sexes and a variation in the experience on cataract surgery (CC) between them. This study is about the Spanish sub-cohort of the survey, and its objective is to present and analyse the peculiarities of ophthalmology training in Spain within the European context, as well as discussing ways to harmonise and improve that training throughout the EU. METHODS: We analyse data of the Spanish participants in the EBO exams, defining subgroups by the Autonomous Communities existing in Spain. RESULTS: 93 of 135 requested participants (68.9%) responded. A 60.2% passed the EBO exam between 2021-2022, being mostly women (65.59%) aged 31 years old on average. The 91.4% were right-handed, coming from 13 of the 17 Spanish autonomous communities, although mostly from the Community of Valencia, Madrid and Catalonia. Respectively, 16.1%, 3.2% and 8.7% of the respondents said they have completed 10 or more training sessions on animal eyes, synthetic eyes and through the virtual reality simulator. This training was correlated with greater self-confidence in the management of a posterior capsular tear during surgery (p .025). All respondents manifested to have already performed stages of the CC. The average number of operations reported was 181.6 with regional disparities. A significant difference is observed between the sexes against women (-28.3%, p 0.03). DISCUSSION: Ophthalmologists in Spain, much more than other European countries, have greater opportunities for surgical training, with surgical procedures during the residency, that nearly triples those made by the others. Spanish women refer, like their European colleagues, to be in disadvantage in learning opportunities about cataract surgery. The Simulation Based Medical Education (SBME) allows to respond to the training deficit and complements the training on the patient. Although we demonstrate a significant correlation between the number of procedures carried out and self-confidence to operate simple cases, the SBME would be a complementary tool in self-confidence in front of a complication like capsular rupture. CONCLUSION: Spain massively adopts the model named by us "surgery for all", despite the underrepresentation of women in this area, emphasising a need for cultural change that the SBME could facilitate.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To prepare a protocol for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) agreed by the majority of Spanish ophthalmologists dedicated to this topic. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A draft of the protocol was produced taking into account the experience of the participants and up to date publications. This draft was corrected by all the ophthalmologists participating in the project, and the final document was agreed by all of them. RESULTS: We present general guidelines as an aid for the treatment of ROP, including treatment criteria, treatment methods, a calendar of action, and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to have a common working protocol for the treatment of ROP to improve care and to avoid mistakes. Although individual Hospitals may adapt the protocol to their daily activity, it is recommended that there is a minimal working protocol agreed by most of professionals dedicated to pediatric ophthalmology in Spain.
Subject(s)
Retinopathy of Prematurity/therapy , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SpainABSTRACT
Objetivo: Realizar un protocolo de tratamiento de la retinopatía del prematuro (ROP) consensuado por la mayor parte de oftalmólogos españoles dedicados al tema. Material y método: Se realizó un borrador del protocolo según la experiencia de los participantes y las publicaciones actualizadas. Este borrador fue corregido por los participantes en el protocolo y se llegó al documento final consensuado por todos los participantes. Resultados: Se presentan las directrices generales para realizar el tratamiento de la ROP, incluyendo criterios de tratamiento, metodología de actuación, calendario de actuación y seguimiento. Conclusiones: Es importante disponer de un protocolo de actuación común en el tratamiento de la ROP para mejorar la actuación y evitar errores. Aunque cada centro hospitalario deba adaptar el protocolo a su actividad clínica, es recomendable que existan un mínimo de procedimientos consensuados por todos los oftalmólogos dedicados a la ROP (AU)
Objective: To prepare a protocol for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) agreed by the majority of Spanish ophthalmologists dedicated to this topic. Material and method: A draft of the protocol was produced taking into account the experience of the participants and up to date publications. This draft was corrected by all the ophthalmologists participating in the project, and the final document was agreed by all of them. Results: We present general guidelines as an aid for the treatment of ROP, including treatment criteria, treatment methods, a calendar of action, and follow-up. Conclusions: It is important to have a common working protocol for the treatment of ROP to improve care and to avoid mistakes. Although individual Hospitals may adapt the protocol to their daily activity, it is recommended that there is a minimal working protocol agreed by most of professionals dedicated to pediatric ophthalmology in Spain (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Retinopathy of Prematurity/therapy , Retinal Neovascularization/therapy , Retinal Detachment/prevention & control , Clinical Protocols , Practice Patterns, Physicians'ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Realizar un protocolo de cribado de la retinopatía del prematuro (ROP), consensuado por la mayor parte de oftalmólogos españoles dedicados al tema. Material y método: Se realizó un borrador del protocolo según la experiencia de los participantes y las publicaciones actualizadas. Este borrador fue corregido por los participantes en el protocolo y se llegó al documento final consensuado por todos los participantes. Resultados: Se presentan las directrices generales para realizar el cribado de la ROP, incluyendo criterios de inclusión y exclusión, metodología de exploración y calendario de actuación. Conclusiones: Es importante disponer de un protocolo de actuación común en el cribado de la ROP para mejorar la actuación y evitar errores. Aunque cada centro hospitalario deba adaptar el protocolo a su actividad clínica es recomendable que existan un mínimo de procedimientos consensuados por todos los oftalmólogos dedicados a la ROP (AU)
Objective: To prepare a retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening program as agreed by most of Spanish ophthalmologists dedicated to this topic. Material and method: A draft of the protocol was produced taking into account the experience of the participants and current publications. This draft was corrected by all the ophthalmologists participating in the project and the final document produced was agreed by all of them. Results: We present general guidelines to help in the screening of ROP, including treatment criteria, treatment methods, and a calendar of action. Conclusions: It is important to have a common working protocol in the screening of ROP to improve the action and to avoid mistakes. Although individual Hospitals may adapt the protocol to their daily activity, it is recommended that there is a minimal working protocol agreed by most of professionals dedicated to pediatric ophthalmology in Spain (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Neonatal Screening/methods , Retinopathy of Prematurity/epidemiology , Guideline Adherence , Practice Patterns, Physicians'ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To prepare a retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening program as agreed by most of Spanish ophthalmologists dedicated to this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A draft of the protocol was produced taking into account the experience of the participants and current publications. This draft was corrected by all the ophthalmologists participating in the project and the final document produced was agreed by all of them. RESULTS: We present general guidelines to help in the screening of ROP, including treatment criteria, treatment methods, and a calendar of action. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to have a common working protocol in the screening of ROP to improve the action and to avoid mistakes. Although individual Hospitals may adapt the protocol to their daily activity, it is recommended that there is a minimal working protocol agreed by most of professionals dedicated to pediatric ophthalmology in Spain.
Subject(s)
Neonatal Screening/standards , Retinopathy of Prematurity/diagnosis , Clinical Protocols , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Practice Guidelines as Topic , SpainABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% in treating conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: Three patients with CIN were treated with topical MMC 0.02%. Our follow-up period was twelve months (range 8-18 months). RESULTS: CIN was resolved in all three cases without modifying the normal corneal and conjunctival architecture. CONCLUSIONS: Topical MMC 0.02% four times daily during two weeks is a useful alternative tool for the surgical management of CIN.
