PDGFR and IGF-1R Inhibitors Induce a G2/M Arrest and Subsequent Cell Death in Human Glioblastoma Cell Lines.

Glioblastomas are highly resistant to radiation and chemotherapy. Currently, there are no effective therapies for this type of tumor. Signaling mechanisms initiated by PDGFR and IGF-1R are important in glioblastoma, and inhibition of the signal transduction pathways initiated by these receptors could be a useful alternative strategy for glioblastoma treatment. We have studied the effects of the PDGFR inhibitor JNJ-10198409 (JNJ) and the IGF-1R inhibitor picropodophyllin (PPP) in glioblastoma cell lines as well as in primary cultures derived from patients affected by this type of tumor. JNJ and PPP treatment blocked PDGFR and IGF-1R signaling respectively and reduced Akt and Erk 1/2 phosphorylation. Both inhibitors diminished cell proliferation, inducing a G2/M block of the cell cycle. Cell death induced by JNJ was caspase-dependent, Annexin-V positive and caused PARP cleavage, especially in T98 cells, suggesting an apoptotic mechanism. However, cell death induced by PPP was not completely inhibited by caspase inhibitors in all cell lines apart from LN-229 cells, indicating a caspase-independent mechanism. Several inhibitors targeted against different cell death pathways could not block this caspase-independent component, which may be a non-programmed necrotic mechanism. Apoptotic arrays performed in T98 and LN-229 cells upon JNJ and PPP treatment revealed that procaspase 3 levels were augmented by both drugs in T98 cells and only by JNJ in LN229-cells. Furthermore, XIAP and survivin levels were much higher in LN-229 cells than in T98 cells, revealing that LN-229 cells are more susceptible to undergo caspase-independent cell death mechanisms. JNJ and PPP combination was more effective than each treatment alone.

Autophagy regulates Selumetinib (AZD6244) induced-apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells.

OBJECTIVE: As Selumetinib is a MEK1/2 inhibitor that has gained interest as an anti-tumor agent, the present study was designed to investigate autophagy involvement on Selumetinib-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. METHODS: CRC cells death and cycle studies were assessed by AnnexinV-FITC and PI staining, respectively. Autophagy flux was analysed by Western Blot (LC3II and p62 protein levels) and retroviral infection of SW480 cells for siBecn1 RNA interference experiments. Confocal microscopy was used to determine mCherry-EGFP-LC3 distribution. KEY FINDINGS: The Selumetinib effects were concentration-dependent in SW480 cell line. Whereas 1 µM exerted an arrest in the cell cycle (G1 phase), higher concentrations (10 µM) induced cell death, which was accompanied by autophagy blockage in its last stages. Autophagy induction by Rapamycin (RAPA) increased cell survival, whereas pharmacology autophagy inhibition by Bafilomycin A1 (BAF), Chloroquine (CQ) or 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) increased Selumetinib-induced CRC cells death. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, these results suggest that autophagy plays a fundamental role in CRC cells response to Selumetinib. In addition, the combination of Selumetinib with autophagy inhibitors may be a useful therapeutic strategy to enhance its activity against colorectal tumours.

HGUE-C-1 is an atypical and novel colon carcinoma cell line.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinoma is a common cause of cancer. Adjuvant treatments include: 5-fluorouracil administered together with folinic acid, or more recently, oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients can benefit from other additional treatments such as cetuximab or bevacizumab. METHODS: Using cell culture techniques, we isolated clonal populations from primary cultures of ascitic effusion derived from a colon cancer patient and after several passages an established cell line, HGUE-C-1, was obtained. Genetic analysis of HGUE-C-1 cells was performed by PCR of selected exons and sequencing. Cell proliferation studies were performed by MTT assays and cell cycle analyses were performed by flow cytometry. Retinoblastoma activity was measured by luciferase assays and proteins levels and activity were analysed by Western blot or immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: We have established a new cell line from ascitic efussion of a colon cancer patient who did not respond to 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan. HGUE-C-1 cells did not show microsatellite instability and did not harbour mutations in KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA or TP53. However, these cells showed loss of heterozygosity affecting Adenomatous Polyposis Coli and nuclear staining of ß-catenin protein. The HGUE-C-1 cell line was sensitive to erlotinib, gefitinib, NVP-BEZ235, rapamycin and trichostatin, among other drugs, but partially resistant to heat shock protein inhibitors and highly resistant to AZD-6244 and oxaliplatin, even though the patient from which this cell line was derived had not been exposed to these drugs. Molecular characterization of this cell line revealed low expression levels and activity of Retinoblastoma protein and elevated basal levels of Erk1/2 activity and p70S6K expression and activity, which may be related to chemoresistance mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: HGUE-C-1 represents a novel and peculiar colon carcinoma model to study chemoresistance to chemotherapeutic agents and to novel anti-neoplasic drugs that interrupt signalling pathways such as the APC/ßcatenin, Ras/Raf/Mek/Erk, PI3K/mTOR/p70S6K pathways as well as histone regulation mechanisms.

Association of a characteristic membrane pattern of annexin A2 with high invasiveness and nodal status in colon adenocarcinoma.

The identification of tumor cells in lymph nodes is essential for the correct classification of patients with colorectal cancer who may benefit from adjuvant treatments. Proper classification of tumor stage becomes entangled by variables such as an insufficient number of lymph nodes examined, which can result in erroneous or missed diagnosis. The determination of pathologic factors in the primary tumor associated with positive lymph nodes is an area of research that has attempted to provide variables to solve this problem. In the present study, we observed that the localization of annexin A2 (AnxA2) in a cell membrane is the characteristic that distinguishes tumor cells with high invasiveness. Localization of AnxA2 expression was also studied in tissue specimens from 58 patients with invasive colorectal carcinoma (T3-T4), who had undergone colectomy with radical lymph node dissection. Interestingly, the membrane pattern observed in tumor cell lines was also identified in patient's tissue samples and allowed us to distinguish among different cell populations with the tumor. Univariate analysis showed that tumor deposits in pericolic fat, extramural vascular invasion, and amount of cells with AnxA2 membrane pattern in the tumor invasive edge had a significant influence on lymph node metastasis. On the contrary, multivariate analysis revealed that the number of cells with AnxA2 membrane pattern (P < 0.05) and tumor deposits (P < 0.05) was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, AnxA2 cellular localization was observed in cell clusters that define tumor budding, and a significant association between both variables was detected.

Resistance to Selumetinib (AZD6244) in colorectal cancer cell lines is mediated by p70S6K and RPS6 activation.

Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) is a MEK1/2 inhibitor that has gained interest as an anti-tumour agent. We have determined the degree of sensitivity/resistance to Selumetinib in a panel of colorectal cancer cell lines using cell proliferation and soft agar assays. Sensitive cell lines underwent G1 arrest, whereas Selumetinib had no effect on the cell cycle of resistant cells. Some of the resistant cell lines showed high levels of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the absence of serum. Selumetinib inhibited phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and RSK and had no effect on AKT phosphorylation in both sensitive and resistant cells. Furthermore, mutations in KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA were not clearly associated with Selumetinib resistance. Surprisingly, Selumetinib was able to inhibit phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase (p70S6K) and its downstream target ribosomal protein S6 (RPS6) in sensitive cell lines. However, p70S6K and RPS6 phosphorylation remained unaffected or even increased in resistant cells. Moreover, in some of the resistant cell lines p70S6K and RPS6 were phosphorylated in the absence of serum. Interestingly, colorectal primary cultures derived from tumours excised to patients exhibited the same behaviour than established cell lines. Pharmacological inhibition of p70S6K using the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235, the specific mTOR inhibitor Rapamycin and the specific p70S6K inhibitor PF-4708671 potentiated Selumetinib effects in resistant cells. In addition, biological inhibition of p70S6K using siRNA rendered responsiveness to Selumetinib in resistant cell lines. Furthermore, combination of p70S6K silencing and PF-47086714 was even more effective. We can conclude that p70S6K and its downstream target RPS6 are potential biomarkers of resistance to Selumetinib in colorectal cancer.

Comparative Study of 17-AAG and NVP-AUY922 in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer Cells: Are There Common Determinants of Sensitivity?

The use of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitors is an attractive antineoplastic therapy. We wanted to compare the effects of the benzoquinone 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG, tanespimycin) and the novel isoxazole resorcinol-based Hsp90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 in a panel of pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma cell lines and in colorectal primary cultures derived from tumors excised to patients. PANC-1, CFPAC-1, and Caco-2 cells were intrinsically resistant to 17-AAG but sensitive to NVP-AUY922. Other cellular models were sensitive to both inhibitors. Human epidermal growth factor receptor receptors and their downstream signaling pathways were downregulated in susceptible cellular models, and concurrently, Hsp70 was induced. Intrinsic resistance to 17-AAG did not correlate with expression of ATP-binding cassette transporters involved in multidrug resistance. Some 17-AAG-resistant, NVP-AUY922-sensitive cell lines lacked NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) enzyme and activity. However, colorectal LoVo cells still responded to both drugs in spite of having undetectable levels and activity of NQO1. Pharmacological and biologic inhibition of NQO1 did not confer resistance to 17-AAG in sensitive cell lines. Therefore, even though 17-AAG sensitivity is related to NQO1 protein levels and enzymatic activity, the absence of NQO1 does not necessarily convey resistance to 17-AAG in these cellular models. Moreover, NVP-AUY922 does not require NQO1 for its action and is a more potent inhibitor than 17-AAG in these cells. More importantly, we show in this report that NVP-AUY922 potentiates the inhibitory effects of chemotherapeutic agents, such as gemcitabine or oxaliplatin, and other drugs that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials as antitumor agents.

Role of receptor tyrosine kinases and their ligands in glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most frequent, aggressive and fatal type of brain tumor. Glioblastomas are characterized by their infiltrating nature, high proliferation rate and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Recently, oncologic therapy experienced a rapid evolution towards "targeted therapy," which is the employment of drugs directed against particular targets that play essential roles in proliferation, survival and invasiveness of cancer cells. A number of molecules involved in signal transduction pathways are used as molecular targets for the treatment of various tumors. In fact, inhibitors of these molecules have already entered the clinic or are undergoing clinical trials. Cellular receptors are clear examples of such targets and in the case of glioblastoma multiforme, some of these receptors and their ligands have become relevant. In this review, the importance of glioblastoma multiforme in signaling pathways initiated by extracellular tyrosine kinase receptors such as EGFR, PDGFR and IGF-1R will be discussed. We will describe their ligands, family members, structure, activation mechanism, downstream molecules, as well as the interaction among these pathways. Lastly, we will provide an up-to-date review of the current targeted therapies in cancer, in particular glioblastoma that employ inhibitors of these pathways and their benefits.

Dual regulation of P-glycoprotein expression by trichostatin A in cancer cell lines.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that the histone deacetylase inhibitor (iHDAc) trichostatin A (TSA) induces an increase in MDR1 gene transcription (ABCB1). This result would compromise the use of iHDACs in combination with other cytotoxic agents that are substrates of P-glycoprotein (Pgp). It has also been reported the use of alternative promoters by the ABCB1 gene and the existence of a translational control of Pgp protein. Finally, the ABCB1 gene is located in a genetic locus with the nested gene RUNDC3B in the complementary DNA strand, raising the possibility that RUNDC3B expression could interfere with ABCB1 alternative promoter regulation. METHODS: A combination of RT-PCR, real time RT-PCR, Western blot and drug accumulation assays by flow cytometry has been used in this study. RESULTS: The iHDACs-induced increase in MDR1 mRNA levels is not followed by a subsequent increase in Pgp protein levels or activity in several pancreatic and colon carcinoma cell lines, suggesting a translational control of Pgp in these cell lines. In addition, the MDR1 mRNA produced in these cell lines is shorter in its 5' end that the Pgp mRNA produced in cell lines expressing Pgp protein. The different size of the Pgp mRNA is due to the use of alternative promoters. We also demonstrate that these promoters are differentially regulated by TSA. The translational blockade of Pgp mRNA in the pancreatic carcinoma cell lines could be related to alterations in the 5' end of the MDR1 mRNA in the Pgp protein expressing cell lines. In addition, we demonstrate that the ABCB1 nested gene RUNDC3B expression although upregulated by TSA is independent of the ABCB1 alternative promoter used. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the increase in MDR1 mRNA expression after iHDACs treatment is clinically irrelevant since this mRNA does not render an active Pgp protein, at least in colon and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that TSA in fact, regulates differentially both ABCB1 promoters, downregulating the upstream promoter that is responsible for active P-glycoprotein expression. These results suggest that iHDACs such as TSA may in fact potentiate the effects of antitumour drugs that are substrates of Pgp. Finally, we also demonstrate that TSA upregulates RUNDC3B mRNA independently of the ABCB1 promoter in use.

Small tyrosine kinase inhibitors interrupt EGFR signaling by interacting with erbB3 and erbB4 in glioblastoma cell lines.

Signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is relevant in glioblastoma. We have determined the effects of the EGFR inhibitor AG1478 in glioblastoma cell lines and found that U87 and LN-229 cells were very sensitive to this drug, since their proliferation diminished and underwent a marked G(1) arrest. T98 cells were a little more refractory to growth inhibition and A172 cells did not undergo a G(1) arrest. This G(1) arrest was associated with up-regulation of p27(kip1), whose protein turnover was stabilized. EGFR autophosphorylation was blocked with AG1478 to the same extent in all the cell lines. Other small-molecule EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors employed in the clinic, such as gefitinib, erlotinib and lapatinib, were able to abrogate proliferation of glioblastoma cell lines, which underwent a G(1) arrest. However, the EGFR monoclonal antibody, cetuximab had no effect on cell proliferation and consistently, had no effect on cell cycle either. Similarly, cetuximab did not inhibit proliferation of U87 ΔEGFR cells or primary glioblastoma cell cultures, whereas small-molecule EGFR inhibitors did. Activity of downstream signaling molecules of EGFR such as Akt and especially ERK1/2 was interrupted with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, whereas cetuximab treatment could not sustain this blockade over time. Small-molecule EGFR inhibitors were able to prevent phosphorylation of erbB3 and erbB4, whereas cetuximab only hindered EGFR phosphorylation, suggesting that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors may mediate their anti-proliferative effects through other erbB family members. We can conclude that small-molecule EGFR inhibitors may be a therapeutic approach for the treatment of glioblastoma patients.

Protein kinase C-alpha antagonizes apoptosis induction by histone deacetylase inhibitors in multidrug resistant leukaemia cells.

Previous studies have documented that while several drug-resistant cells enter apoptosis upon treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors (iHDACs), their drug-sensitive counterparts do not. In the present study, we have investigated at the molecular level why parental drug-sensitive tumor cells do not respond to Trichostatin A and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, two iHDACs that promote apoptosis in drug-resistant leukaemia cells. Taking murine leukaemia L1210 cells as a model, we have determined that: (i) PKC-alpha expression is more elevated in parental L1210 than in drug-resistant L1210/R cells, (ii) activation of PKC neutralizes iHDACs-mediated apoptosis in L1210/R cells, (iii) depletion of PKC in parental L1210 cells results in a positive response to iHDACs-mediated apoptosis, and (iv) transfection of a mutant constitutively active PKC-alpha form in L1210/R cells makes the cells refractory to apoptosis induction by iHDACs. These results allow us to conclude that activation/high expression of PKC-alpha protects parental drug-sensitive L1210 cells from iHDACs-mediated apoptosis. Thus, determination of PKC-alpha levels/activity in leukaemia seems to be relevant when choosing efficient chemotherapy protocols based on the use of apoptosis-inducing anticancer drugs.

Tumour cells resistance in cancer therapy.

Resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs presents a big caveat for cancer treatment. In this review we will describe the molecular mechanisms involved in chemoresistance, discussing the mechanisms of resistance related to tumour microenvironment, as well as their intracellular mechanisms. Chemoresistance can also appear as a consequence to treatments with new anticancer drugs. In this sense, we will exemplify this type of resistance discussing mechanisms of action of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. We conclude that the main problem of chemoresistance is due to its pleiotropic and multifactorial nature.

Cyclin D3 is down-regulated by rapamycin in HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer cells.

Rapamycin and its analogues are being tested as new antitumor agents. Rapamycin binds to FKBP-12 and this complex inhibits the activity of FRAP/mammalian target of rapamycin, which leads to dephosphorylation of 4EBP1 and p70 S6 kinase, resulting in blockade of translation initiation. We have found that RAP inhibits the growth of HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. The phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin, p70 S6 kinase, and 4EBP1 is inhibited by rapamycin and cells are arrested in the G1 phase, as determined by growth assays, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation studies. Rapamycin causes down-regulation of cyclin D3 protein, retinoblastoma hypophosphorylation, loss of cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) 4, cdk6, and cdk2 activity. The half-life of cyclin D3 protein decreases after rapamycin treatment, but not its synthesis, whereas the synthesis or half-life of cyclin D1 protein is not affected by the drug. Additionally, rapamycin caused accumulation of ubiquitinated forms of cyclin D3 protein, proteasome inhibitors blocked the effect of rapamycin on cyclin D3, and rapamycin stimulated the activity of the proteasome, showing that the effect of rapamycin on cyclin D3 is proteasome proteolysis dependent. This effect depends on the activity of HER-2 because Herceptin, a neutralizing antibody against HER-2, is able to block both the induction of proteasome activity and the cyclin D3 down-regulation due to rapamycin. Furthermore, inhibition of HER-2 gene expression by using small interfering RNA blocked the rapamycin effects on cyclin D3. These data indicate that rapamycin causes a G1 arrest in HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer cells that is associated with a differential destabilization and subsequent down-regulation of cyclin D3 protein.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors induced caspase-independent apoptosis in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines.

The antitumor activity of the histone deacetylase inhibitors was tested in three well-characterized pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines, IMIM-PC-1, IMIM-PC-2, and RWP-1. These cell lines have been previously characterized in terms of their origin, the status of relevant molecular markers for this kind of tumor, resistance to other antineoplastic drugs, and expression of differentiation markers. In this study, we report that histone deacetylase inhibitors induce apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cell lines, independently of their intrinsic resistance to conventional antineoplastic agents. The histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced apoptosis is due to a serine protease-dependent and caspase-independent mechanism. Initially, histone deacetylase inhibitors increase Bax protein levels without affecting Bcl-2 levels. Consequently, the apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and Omi/HtrA2 are released from the mitochondria, with the subsequent induction of the apoptotic program. These phenomena require AIF relocalization into the nuclei to induce DNA fragmentation and a serine protease activity of Omi/HtrA2. These data, together with previous results from other cellular models bearing the multidrug resistance phenotype, suggest a possible role of the histone deacetylase inhibitors as antineoplastic agents for the treatment of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma.