Reference intervals for reticulocyte count and derived reticulocyte parameters in a cohort of healthy adults.

INTRODUCTION: Reticulocyte count and novel derived parameters provide insight into the effectiveness of erythropoiesis and may be useful tools in the classification and diagnosis of anemias. However, there is no standardisation, so we consider it necessary that each laboratory evaluates the parameters according to its own methodology and instrumentation and establishes its own reference ranges. Our aim was to establish the reference intervals (RIs) of reticulocyte profile provided by the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 haematological autoanalyzer in our reference population. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-five healthy adults (18 to 62 years) were included. Subjects were collected from the blood donation centre of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) upon informed consent. Whole blood was collected and assayed for 14 haematological parameters on the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 analyzer in the haematology laboratory of the Clinical Analysis Department. RIs were established as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute EP28-A3c guidelines using three different statistical approaches. RESULTS: RIs estimated using the non-parametric method and the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method were very similar. RIs estimated by the robust method were narrower. Gender partitioning was required for two haematological parameters (low haemoglobin density (LHD) and microcytic anaemia factor (MAF)). The rest of the parameters did not need to be partitioned according to Lahti's method. CONCLUSION: RIs have been established for 14 hematologic parameters of the reticulocyte profile for the Beckman Coulter DxH 900 haematology analyzer using a healthy cohort of adult subjects.

Monocyte distribution width (MDW): study of reference values in blood donors.

OBJECTIVES: Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a new biomarker used as an early indicator of sepsis (ESId). It is often aids in the identification of patients who may develop sepsis. This study aims to establish the MDW reference interval (RI) within the healthy population of blood donors using EDTA-K2 as anticoagulant. Many hospitals use this biomarker as a means of identifying patients who present to the hospital with sepsis. METHODS: A total of 274 samples obtained from healthy donors were analyzed. MDW measurements were taken within 2 h post-extraction. The RI was estimated using various statistical methodologies, including the recommended CLSI EP28-A3c guideline, non-parametric and robust methods, along with the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method applied to the entire sample. RESULTS: The RI estimated through non-parametric method was 14.77 CI90 % (14.36-14.97)-21.13 CI90 % (20.89-21.68); RI using the robust method was 15.64-19.05 and RI using the Harrell-Davis bootstrap method was 14.73 CI90 % (14.53-14.92)-21.14 CI90 % (20.88-21.40). CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical applicability, we recommend utilizing the RI derived from the non-parametric method, aligning with the CLSI recommendations. Furthermore, we consider that our results can be taken as a reference in other laboratories that serve a population similar to our study cohort.

Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as an infection indicator in severe patients attending in the Emergency Department: a pilot study / Ancho de distribución de los monocitos como indicador de infección en pacientes graves atendidos en Urgencias: estudio piloto

Background. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a biomarker for sepsis diagnosis in severe patients attended in the Emergency Department for different conditions and not only infections. Methods. We performed an observational study in a consecutive prospective cohort including severe patients attending the Emergency Department with different conditions. MDW and other biomarkers were determined from samples obtained during the first care of patients. The diagnostic performance of the different biomarkers was determined based on the final diagnosis at patient discharge. Results: One hundred two patients, with a mean age of 76.7 (SD 16.5) years were included, 53 being (51.9%) male. Among the patients included, 65 (63.7%) had an infectious disease while the remaining had other different conditions. A MDW cut-off of 20.115 provided the best accuracy to identify infected patients, with a sensitivity of 89.2 (95% CI 79.4-94.7), a specificity of 89.2 (95% CI 75.3-95.7), a positive predictive value of 93.5 (95% CI 84.6-97.5), a negative predictive value of 82.5% (95% CI 68.0-91.3), a positive likelihood ratio of 8.25 (3.26-20.91), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (0.06-0.24). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for infection according to MDW was 0.943 (95% CI 0.897-0.989; p<0.001). Conclusions: A MDW > 20.115 may be associated with infection and could help to distinguish between infected and non-infected patients in severe patients. These results must be confirmed in new studies due to the limited patient sample included. (AU)

Introducción: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el desempeño diagnóstico del ancho de distribución de monocitos (MDW) como biomarcador para el diagnóstico desepsis entre pacientes graves atendidos en el servicio de urgencias por diferentes afecciones y no solo por infecciones. Métodos: Realizamos un estudio observacional en una cohorte prospectiva consecutiva que incluyó pacientes graves desde el punto de vista clínico que acudían a urgencias con diferentes patologías. El MDW y otros biomarcadores se determinaron a partir de muestras obtenidas durante la primera atención de los pacientes. Se estudio la precisión de los diferentes biomarcadores para apoyar el diagnósticode infección, basándonos en el diagnóstico final al alta del paciente. Resultados: Se incluyeron 102 pacientes, con una edad media de 76,7 (DE 16,5) años, siendo 53 (51,9%) del sexo masculino. Entre los pacientes incluidos, 65 (63,7%) pacientes tenían una enfermedad infecciosa y el resto otras condiciones diferentes. Un punto de corte MDW de 20,115proporcionó la mejor precisión para identificar pacientes infectados, con un sensibilidad de 89,2 (IC 95 % 79,4-94,7), una especificidad de 89,2 (IC 95 % 75,3-95,7), un valor predictivo positivo de 93,5 (IC 95 % 84,6-97,5), un valor predictivo negativo de 82,5% (IC 95% 68,0-91,3), un coeficiente de probabilidad positivo de 8,25 (3,26-20,91), y uncoeficiente de probabilidad negativo de 0,12 (0,06-0,24). El área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor para la infección del MDW fue de 0,943 (IC del 95 %: 0,897-0,989; p<0,001). Conclusiones: Un MDW > 20.115 se asocia a padecer una enfermedad infecciosa en un paciente grave y podría ayudar a distinguir entre pacientes infectados y no infectados. Estos resultados deben ser confirmados en nuevos estudios debido a la muestra limitada de pacientes incluidos. (AU)