Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(9): 1838-1846, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33866520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Second-line (2L) treatments for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) achieve a modest benefit at the expense of potential toxicity. In the absence of predictive factors of response, the identification of prognostic factors could help in the therapeutic decisions-making. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic factors associated with shorter survival in patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single institution retrospective study, which included all patients with advanced PDAC who received 2L treatment between September 2006 and February 2020 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). Significant variables in the logistic regression model were used to create a prognostic score. RESULTS: We included 108 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 5.10 months (95%CI 4.02-6.17). In the multivariate analysis, time to progression (TTP) shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment (OR 4.53 [95%CI 1.28-16.00] p = 0.01), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) greater than 3 at the beginning of 2L (OR 9.07 [95%CI 1.82-45.16] p = 0.01) and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L (OR 7.83 [95%CI 1.30-49.97] p = 0.02) were independently associated with OS shorter than 3 months. The prognostic score classified patients into three prognostic groups (good, intermediate and poor) with significant differences in OS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TTP shorter than 4 months after first-line treatment, NLR greater than 3 and CA-19.9 level higher than the upper limit of normal at the beginning of 2L were associated with shorter overall survival. We developed a prognostic score that classifies patients with advanced PDAC into three prognostic groups after progression to the first-line. This score could help in the decision-making for 2L treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate/blood , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Clinical Decision-Making , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Female , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Logistic Models , Lymphocytes/cytology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/cytology , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Oxaloacetates/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Gemcitabine
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(6): 1245-1252, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33231859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer and cancer therapies have been associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, the incidence of VTE in patients on immunotherapy has not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and ascertain its prognostic utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective study, including all cancer patients treated with anti-Programmed cell Death 1 (PD-1), anti-Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Protein 4 (CTLA4), a combination of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 or a combination including any of these drugs with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents or both between June 2013 and April 2019 at La Paz University Hospital, Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: We selected 229 patients. VTE occurred in 16 of 229 patients (7%). VTE occurred more frequently in patients with lung cancer followed by melanoma. Female sex and melanoma were independently associated with an increased risk of VTE. 12 of 16 VTE (75%) were symptomatic. Progressive disease to immunotherapy [HR 31.60 (95% CI 11.44-87.22), p = 0.00], lung cancer [HR 2.55 (95% CI 1.34-4.86), p = 0.00] and melanoma [HR 2.42 (1.20-4.86), p = 0.01] were independently associated with shorter OS. VTE occurrence was not independently associated with shorter OS [HR 1.33 (95% CI 0.63-2.80), p = 0.44]. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of VTE in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy in our study appeared to be similar to the incidence previously reported in other series of cancer patients treated with systemic therapies. VTE occurrence did not correlate with the prognosis. Further and prospective studies are needed to derive definitive conclusions.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Neoplasms/therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL