Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Burns ; 44(2): 475-480, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28935221

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fungal infections remain a major cause of mortality in the burned population. Mafenide acetate/amphotericin B solution (SMAT) has been used topically for prophylaxis and treatment of these infections. Current manufacturer guidelines only guarantee the stability of mafenide solution and amphotericin B at room temperature. Additionally, the recommended maximum storage time for mafenide solution is 48h, leading to significant financial and material loss when unused solutions are discarded. The purpose of this study was to characterize the chemical stability, structure and bioactivity of SMAT stored at 2°C, 25°C, and 40°C for up to 90 days. METHODS: Stability analyses of SMAT solutions containing 2.5% or 5% mafenide plus 2µg/mL amphotericin B were performed using high performance liquid chromatography. Chemical structure was assessed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Bioactivity against clinically relevant species was examined. RESULTS: The chemical structure and stability of mafenide did not change over 90days at all temperatures. Amphotericin B was undetectable in SMAT solutions after two days at high temperatures, which was slowed by refrigerated storage. Against Staphylococcus aureus, SMAT activity began to decrease generally between two and seven days. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, activity slowly tapered and was gone by day 90. SMAT retained high bioactivity against Candida albicans for over 40days and was not affected by temperature. CONCLUSIONS: The amphotericin B component of SMAT is degraded within 2days under warm storage. While mafenide was stable over 90 days, the bioactivity of SMAT solution may be lost within 2days as well.


Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/chemistry , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/chemistry , Burns/therapy , Mafenide/chemistry , Skin Diseases, Infectious/prevention & control , Temperature , Administration, Cutaneous , Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Burns/complications , Candida albicans/drug effects , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Drug Stability , Drug Storage , Humans , Mafenide/pharmacology , Pharmaceutical Solutions , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Skin Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
2.
Mil Med ; 180(3 Suppl): 80-5, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25747637

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ibuprofen is commonly used by Soldiers in the deployed environment. This study investigated its dose-effects on in vitro coagulation. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 4 normal healthy pigs and were processed to make platelet-adjusted (100×10(3)/µL) blood samples. Ibuprofen was added to the samples at doses of 0 µg/mL (control), recommended oral dose (163 µg/mL, 1×), 2×, 4×, 8×, 10×, 12×, 16×, and 20×. Arachidonic acid or collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation was assessed at 15 minutes after the addition of ibuprofen. Coagulation was assessed with measurements of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and thrombelastography by Rotem. RESULTS: A robust inhibition of ibuprofen on arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was observed at all doses tested. Collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation was inhibited to 71%±5% and 10%±5% of the control values at ibuprofen doses of 4× and 20×, respectively (both p<0.05). No changes were observed in PT at any dose, but aPTT was prolonged at dose of 16× and 20×. Rotem measurements of coagulation time, clot formation time, maximum clot firmness, and A10 were compromised at dose 16× and 20× (all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen inhibited platelet aggregation at recommended doses, but did not compromise aPTT or coagulation profile until at 16 times the recommended doses and higher. Further effort is needed to clarify whether there are different dose-responses between human and pig blood samples in trauma situations.


Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation/drug effects , Shock, Hemorrhagic/drug therapy , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Blood Coagulation Tests , Disease Models, Animal , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Prothrombin Time , Shock, Hemorrhagic/blood , Swine , Thrombelastography
3.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 25(8): 831-7, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25004022

ABSTRACT

Acetaminophen (Ace) and meloxicam (Mel) are the two types of analgesic and antipyretic medications. This study investigated the dose responses of acetaminophen and meloxicam on platelet aggregation and coagulation function in human blood samples. Blood samples were collected from six healthy humans and processed to make platelet-adjusted (100 × 10 cells/µl) blood samples. Acetaminophen (Tylenol, Q-PAP, 100 mg/ml) was added at the doses of 0 µg/ml (control), 214 µg/ml (the standard dose, 1 ×), 4 ×, 8 ×, 10 ×, 12 ×, 16 ×, and 20 ×. Similarly, meloxicam (Metacam, 5 mg/ml) was added at doses of 0 µg/ml (control), 2.85 µg/ml (the standard dose, 1 ×), 4 ×, 8 ×, 10 ×, 12 ×, 16 ×, and 20 ×. Fifteen minutes after the addition of acetaminophen and/or meloxicam, platelet aggregation was stimulated with collagen (2 µg/ml) or arachidonic acid (0.5 mmol/l) and assessed using a Chrono-Log 700 aggregometer. Coagulation function was assessed by prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and using Rotem thrombelastogram. A robust inhibition by acetaminophen and/or meloxicam was observed in arachidonic acid-stimulated platelet aggregation starting at 1 × dose. Collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation was inhibited by ACE starting at 1 × (78 ± 10% of control), and by meloxicam starting at 4 × (72 ± 5% of control, both P < 0.05). The inhibitions by acetaminophen and meloxicam combined were similar to those by acetaminophen or meloxicam. aPTT was prolonged by meloxicam starting at 4 ×. No changes were observed in PT or any of Rotem measurements by acetaminophen and/or meloxicam. Acetaminophen and meloxicam compromised platelet aggregation and aPTT. Further effort is warranted to characterize the effects of acetaminophen and meloxicam on bleeding in vivo.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen/pharmacology , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Platelet Aggregation/drug effects , Thiazines/pharmacology , Thiazoles/pharmacology , Arachidonic Acid/antagonists & inhibitors , Arachidonic Acid/pharmacology , Blood Cells/drug effects , Blood Specimen Collection , Cells, Cultured , Collagen/antagonists & inhibitors , Collagen/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Meloxicam , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Prothrombin Time , Thrombelastography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...