One-year follow-up evaluation of reservoirs in bleaching trays for at-home bleaching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the color change stability and patient satisfaction after one-year of at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) in trays with or without reservoirs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were subjected to bleaching with CP (3 h/daily; 21 days) with a bleaching tray with or without reservoirs. The color was measured one-month and one-year after the completion of bleaching using the spectrophotometer (ΔEab, Δ00 and ΔWi), and shade guide units (ΔSGU). Patients' satisfaction were assessed using a 5-point Likert Scale questionnaire. Data were submitted to paired t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference between color change after one-month and one-year was observed (VITA Classical shade guide unit and the ΔWi; p > 0.53). Significant differences were observed for the VITA Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER shade guide, ΔEab and ΔE00 (p < 0.03). The level of patient satisfaction was similar between groups (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Bleaching tray design did not have any influence on the bleaching stability for the 10% CP (Opalescence PF, Ultradent). Patients were very satisfied with the bleaching outcomes regardless of the bleaching tray design. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Placement of reservoirs in bleaching trays does not increase longevity of dental bleaching. No clinically important color rebound was observed 1 year after bleaching with 10% CP.

Evaluation of reservoirs in bleaching trays for at-home bleaching: a split-mouth single-blind randomized controlled equivalence trial.

Objectives This randomized, split-mouth, single-blinded trial assessed whether the use of reservoirs in at-home bleaching trays is equivalent to non-reservoir trays. Our choice of an equivalence trial was based on the expectation that a non-reservoir tray is sufficient to produce a color change. Secondary outcomes such as tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were also assessed. Methodology Forty-six patients were selected with canines shade A2 or darker. In half of the patient's arch, bleaching trays were made with reservoirs and the other half, without reservoirs. At-home bleaching was performed with carbamide peroxide (CP) 10% (3 h daily; 21 days). Color change was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index) and shade guide units (ΔSGU) at baseline, during and one-month post-bleaching. TS and GI were assessed with a numeric scale (NRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Results After one month, the equivalence of reservoir and non-reservoir groups were observed in all color instruments (p>0.05). Fifteen and sixteen patients presented pain (absolute risk: 33% and 35%, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 21-46% and 23-49%) in the reservoir and non-reservoir side, respectively. The odds ratio for pain was 0.8 (95%CI 0.2-3.0) and the p-value was non-significant (p=1.0). TS intensity was similar between both groups in any of the pain scales (p>0.05). No difference in the GI was observed (p>0.05). Conclusions The protocol with reservoirs is equivalent in color change to the non-reservoir, although no superiority of the latter was observed in terms of reduced TS and GI with at-home 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching. Clinical Relevance The presence of reservoirs in a bleaching tray did not improve color change or affect tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation.

Dentin moisture does not influence postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial evaluated the influence of dentin moisture on postoperative sensitivity (POS) in posterior restorations using a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive, until 12 months of clinical service. METHODS: 90 restorations were inserted in 45 patients to treat carious lesions or to replace existing posterior restorations with a depth ≥ 3 mm. After cavity preparation, the simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2) was applied on dry or wet dentin followed by a bulk-fill resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill) under rubber dam isolation. The patient's spontaneous and stimulated POS was evaluated at baseline and after 7 days, 6 months, and 12 months of clinical evaluation. The secondary parameters (marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, fracture and recurrence of caries) were evaluated by World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria after 7 days, 6 and 12 months of clinical evaluation. RESULTS: No significant spontaneous and stimulated POS was observed when dry and wet dentin were compared (P> 0.05). A significant and higher risk of spontaneous POS (18.6%; 95% CI 9.7 to 32.6) occurred up to 48 hours after restoration placement for both groups when compared to all evaluation times (P< 0.03). However, the intensity of POS was mild at up to 48 hours with a difference between the dry and wet dentin groups (P> 0.79). When secondary parameters were evaluated, no significant difference between the groups were observed (P> 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The moisture level of the dentin substrate in posterior restorations does not influence POS in bulk-fill resin composite posterior restorations when associated with an etch-and-rinse ethanol-based adhesive system.

Evaluation of reservoirs in bleaching trays for at-home bleaching: a split-mouth single-blind randomized controlled equivalence trial

Abstract Objectives This randomized, split-mouth, single-blinded trial assessed whether the use of reservoirs in at-home bleaching trays is equivalent to non-reservoir trays. Our choice of an equivalence trial was based on the expectation that a non-reservoir tray is sufficient to produce a color change. Secondary outcomes such as tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were also assessed. Methodology Forty-six patients were selected with canines shade A2 or darker. In half of the patient's arch, bleaching trays were made with reservoirs and the other half, without reservoirs. At-home bleaching was performed with carbamide peroxide (CP) 10% (3 h daily; 21 days). Color change was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index) and shade guide units (ΔSGU) at baseline, during and one-month post-bleaching. TS and GI were assessed with a numeric scale (NRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Results After one month, the equivalence of reservoir and non-reservoir groups were observed in all color instruments (p>0.05). Fifteen and sixteen patients presented pain (absolute risk: 33% and 35%, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 21-46% and 23-49%) in the reservoir and non-reservoir side, respectively. The odds ratio for pain was 0.8 (95%CI 0.2-3.0) and the p-value was non-significant (p=1.0). TS intensity was similar between both groups in any of the pain scales (p>0.05). No difference in the GI was observed (p>0.05). Conclusions The protocol with reservoirs is equivalent in color change to the non-reservoir, although no superiority of the latter was observed in terms of reduced TS and GI with at-home 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching. Clinical Relevance The presence of reservoirs in a bleaching tray did not improve color change or affect tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation.

Does the Use of Reservoirs Have Any Impact on the Efficacy of At-Home Bleaching? A Systematic Review.

To answer the following focused question through a systematic review: "Are the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy different between adult patients who undergo at-home bleaching using trays with reservoirs and those who use trays without reservoirs?". A comprehensive search was performed in the MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Brazilian Library in Dentistry, Cochrane Library, and grey literature without restrictions. Abstracts from conferences; unpublished and ongoing trial registries, dissertations and theses (ProQuest Dissertations and Periódicos Capes Theses databases) were searched. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. We used the Risk of Bias tool (RoB) from the Cochrane Collaboration for quality assessment. After the removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening and full-text examination, nine RCTs remained for qualitative analyses. The great majority of the studies did not report the method of randomization, allocation concealment, and examiner blinding during color assessment. From the nine studies, eight were at unclear risk of bias. In regard to color change, four studies reported no change and two reported improved color change with reservoirs. Only four studies recorded tooth sensitivity and they reported no significant differences. Only one study reported greater gingival irritation with reservoirs. Lack of data reporting prevented us from running a meta-analysis. Further well-designed RCT should be conducted to answer this research question. So far there is not evidence to support that reservoirs in bleaching trays improve color change. PROSPERO - CRD42016037628.

Does the use of reservoirs have any impact on the efficacy of at-home bleaching? a systematic review

Abstract To answer the following focused question through a systematic review: "Are the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy different between adult patients who undergo at-home bleaching using trays with reservoirs and those who use trays without reservoirs?". A comprehensive search was performed in the MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Brazilian Library in Dentistry, Cochrane Library, and grey literature without restrictions. Abstracts from conferences; unpublished and ongoing trial registries, dissertations and theses (ProQuest Dissertations and Periódicos Capes Theses databases) were searched. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. We used the Risk of Bias tool (RoB) from the Cochrane Collaboration for quality assessment. After the removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening and full-text examination, nine RCTs remained for qualitative analyses. The great majority of the studies did not report the method of randomization, allocation concealment, and examiner blinding during color assessment. From the nine studies, eight were at unclear risk of bias. In regard to color change, four studies reported no change and two reported improved color change with reservoirs. Only four studies recorded tooth sensitivity and they reported no significant differences. Only one study reported greater gingival irritation with reservoirs. Lack of data reporting prevented us from running a meta-analysis. Further well-designed RCT should be conducted to answer this research question. So far there is not evidence to support that reservoirs in bleaching trays improve color change. PROSPERO - CRD42016037628

Resumo Para responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa através de uma revisão sistemática: "O risco e a intensidade de sensibilidade dentária (SD) e eficácia de clareamento são diferentes entre pacientes adultos que realizam clareamento caseiro usando moldeiras com reservatórios e aqueles que usam moldeiras sem reservatórios?". Uma pesquisa abrangente foi realizada no MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Biblioteca Cochrane e literatura cinzenta, sem restrições. Os resumos da conferência anual da Associação Internacional para Pesquisa Dental além de estudos registrados ou em andamento também foram pesquisados. Dissertações e Teses foram pesquisados utilizando o Capes Journal Dissertações e Teses ProQuest. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) foram incluídos. Usamos a ferramenta Risk of Bias (RoB) da Cochrane para avaliação de qualidade. Após a remoção de duplicatas, triagem de título e resumo e exame de texto completo, nove ECRs permaneceram para análises qualitativas. A grande maioria dos estudos não relatou o método de randomização, ocultação de alocação e cegamento do examinador durante a avaliação de cores. Dos nove estudos, oito estavam sob risco claro de viés. Em relação à mudança de cor, quatro estudos não relataram nenhuma mudança e dois relataram melhora na mudança de cor com reservatórios. Apenas quatro estudos registraram a sensibilidade dentária e não relataram diferenças significativas. Apenas um estudo relatou maior irritação gengival com reservatórios. A falta de relatórios de dados nos impediu de executar uma meta-análise. Outros ECR bem desenhados devem ser conduzidos para responder a esta questão de pesquisa. Até agora não há evidências que sustentem que reservatórios em moldeiras de clareamento melhorem a mudança de cor. PROSPERO - CRD42016037628

Clinical Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Whitening Dentifrices / Avaliação Clínica da Eficácia de Dentifrícios Clareadores

O objetivo deste estudo clínico foi avaliar, por 7 semanas, a eficácia de dentifrícios clareadores e a satisfação dos pacientes após o uso. Foram selecionados 30 pacientes que possuíssem todos os dentes anteriores nas arcadas superior e inferior, apresentando cor inicial A2, avaliados através da escala de cores Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha). Os participantes foram aleatoriamente divididos em 3 grupos (n=10): GA - Colgate® Máxima Proteção Anticáries (controle negativo), GB - Colgate® Luminous White e GC - Colgate® Luminous White Advanced. Os dentifrícios foram distribuídos em bisnagas idênticas e aleatorizados. As avaliações de cor foram realizadas inicialmente ao uso (baseline), após 7, 15, 30 e 60 dias, utilizando dois métodos: avaliação subjetiva com as escalas de cor Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha) e Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha), e avaliação objetiva através do espectrofotômetro VITA Easyshade Compact®, Vident, Brea, CA, USA). Foi considerada a satisfação do paciente quanto a mudança de cor dos dentes. Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística, utilizando análise de variância (ANOVA) de três critérios e pós-teste de Tukey (α=0.05). Os resultados demonstraram que houve diferença de cor estatisticamente significante nos grupos em que se utilizou os dentifrícios clareadores (GB e GC), nos períodos entre 15 e 30 dias. Conclui-se que ambos os dentifrícios GB e GC apresentaram ação clareadora, observado através das escalas subjetiva e objetiva. Porém, na percepção do paciente apenas no grupo GC houve mudança de cor. (AU).

The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate, for 7 weeks, the efficacy of whitening dentifrices and the patients' satisfaction after use. 30 patients were selected who had all the anterior teeth in the upper and lower arches, presenting an initial color A2, evaluated through the Vita Classical color scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The participants were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 10): GA - Colgate® Maximum Antibody Protection (Negative Control), GB - Colgate® Luminous White and GC - Colgate® Luminous White Advanced. The dentifrices were distributed in identical and randomized tubes. The color evaluations were performed at baseline after 7, 15, 30 and 60 days using two methods: subjective evaluation with the Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) and Vita Bleachedguide 3D- MASTER (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), and objective evaluation using VITA Easyshade Compact® spectrophotometer, Vident, Brea, CA, USA). The patient's satisfaction with the teeth color change was considered. The data were submitted to statistical analysis using ANOVA of three criteria and Tukey post-test (α = 0.05). The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in color in the groups in which the whitening dentifrices were used (GB and GC), in periods between 15 and 30 days. It was concluded that both GB and CG dentifrices presented a whitening action, observed through the subjective and objective scales. However, in the perception of the patient only in the CG group there was a change of color. (AU).

Effect of an experimental desensitizing agent on reduction of bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In this randomized study, split-mouth, triple-blind clinical trial, the authors evaluated the efficacy of a desensitizing gel that contained 5% potassium nitrate and 5% glutaraldehyde applied before in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP). METHODS: Treatment with the desensitizing or placebo control gels was randomly assigned to one-half of the maxillary teeth of 42 patients in a split-mouth design. The desensitizing gels were applied and maintained in contact with the tooth enamel for 10 minutes, followed by 2 HP bleaching sessions separated by 1 week. The primary outcome variable was pain intensity assessed with a numeric rating scale and a visual analog scale. Color was evaluated by means of a digital spectrophotometer and a value-oriented shade guide. RESULTS: The difference in risk of developing tooth sensitivity between the desensitizing gel group (31.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 19.6 to 46.9) and the control group (70.7%; 95% CI, 55.5 to 82.3%) was statistically significant (P < .0001), as well as the difference in pain intensity in the first 24 hours (P < .001). No statistically significant difference was found in color change between teeth that received the desensitizing gel and those that received the placebo gel. CONCLUSIONS: Application of desensitizing gel that contained 5% potassium nitrate and 5% glutaraldehyde before HP whitening reduced the risk and severity of dental sensitivity, without altering the effectiveness of whitening. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: A single application of desensitizing gel that contained 5% potassium nitrate and 5% glutaraldehyde can reduce tooth sensitivity after dental bleaching systems.

Self-Etching Enamel Bonding Using Acidic Functional Monomers with Different-length Carbon Chains and Hydrophilicity.

PURPOSE: To compare the enamel bonding performace of two commercial and three experimental two-step self-etch adhesives containing acidic functional monomers with different carbon-spacer length and hydrophilicity. The contact angle was also assessed to evaluate the wettability of each tested material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted human molars were sectioned into four parts (buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal) and divided into 5 groups, according to the adhesives used: Clearfil SE Bond (CSE), AdheSE (ADSE), 10-MDP (15 mol% 10-methacryloyldecylphosphate), CAP-P (15 mol% caprolactone phosphate), and MTEP (15 mol% methacryloyltetraethylene phosphate). Enamel specimens were bonded with each adhesive and submitted to microshear bond strength (µSBS) testing after 24 h. The adhesives were applied onto additional enamel specimens without light curing to assess contact angle. Then the etching pattern was analyzed using SEM and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The µSBS and contact angle data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: 10-MDP showed the highest µSBS of the tested groups (p < 0.05), followed by CAP-P and CSE (p < 0.05). MTEP and ADSE exhibited the lowest µSBS (p < 0.05), but the difference between them was not significant. 10-MDP, CSE, and CAP-P exhibited lower contact angles (p < 0.05) than did ADSE and MTEP. The SEM and CLSM analyses showed that 10-MDP and CSE had the most pronounced etching patterns and deepest adhesive penetration. ADSE and MTEP exhibited weak etching ability and adhesive penetration, while CAP-P produced moderate etching and intermediate penetration. CONCLUSIONS: The length and hydrophilicity of the functional monomer spacer chain tested in this study influenced the enamel bonding performance. Functional monomers with longer chains and more hydrophobic properties, such as 10-MDP and CAP-P, may interact better with enamel and achieve higher enamel bond strength.

Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To answer the following PICO question (participant, intervention, comparator and outcome): Does flowable resin composite restorations compared with regular resin composites improve the marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration and retention rates of restorations placed in non-carious cervical lesions [NCCLs] of adults?, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. SOURCE: MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BBO, Cochrane Library and SIGLE were searched without restrictions, as well as the abstracts of the IADR, clinical trials registries, dissertations and theses in May 2016 (updated in April 2017). STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that answered the PICO question. RCTs were excluded if cavities other than NCCLs were treated; indirect restorations; polyacid-based resins instead of composite resins were employed, restorations in primary teeth and restorations were placed in carious cervical lesions. The risk of bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration was applied in the eligible studies and the GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of the evidence. DATA: After duplicates removal, 5137 articles were identified. After abstract and title screening, 8 studies remained. Six were at "unclear" risk of bias. The study follow-ups ranged from 1 to 3 years. No significant difference was observed between groups for loss of retention and marginal discoloration in all follow-ups. Better marginal adaptation was observed for restorations performed with flowable composites. At 1-year (risk ratio=0.27 [0.10 to 0.70]) and 3-year (risk ratio=0.34 [0.17 to 0.71]) follow-ups, flowable composites showed a risk 73% and 66% lower than regular composites for lack of adaptation, respectively. The evidence was graded as moderate quality for loss or retention at 3 years due to risk of bias and low and very low for all other outcomes due to risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. CONCLUSIONS: We have moderate confidence that the resin composite viscosity does not influence the retention rates at 3 years. Similar marginal discoloration and better marginal adaptation was observed for flowable composites but the quality of evidence is doubtful. (PROSPERO CRD42015019560).

Nasolabial Cyst Associated with Odontogenic Infection.

The nasolabial cyst or Klestadt cyst is a relatively uncommon nonodontogenic cyst that develops in the nasal alar region; it has uncertain pathogenesis. This lesion has slow growth and variable dimensions and is characterized clinically by a floating tumefaction in the nasolabial fold area around the bridge of the nose, causing an elevation of the upper lip and relative facial asymmetry. Diagnosis is primarily made clinically; if necessary, this is complemented by imaging. This paper reports the case of a 39-year-old male patient who complained of pain in the right upper premolar region and poor aesthetics due to a firm tumor in the right wing of the nose. Initially, this was thought to be due to an odontogenic abscess; however, the differential diagnosis was that a nasolabial cyst was communicating with the apex of teeth 14 and 15. Surgical treatment was carried out, followed by histopathological examination and concomitant endodontic treatment of the teeth involved.

Análise da capacidade de remoção de pigmentos da resina composta pelo peróxido de hidrogênio 35% / Capacity analysis of pigment removal of composite resin by hydrogen peroxide 35%

Objetivo: Avaliar in vitro a capacidade de remoção de pigmentos ocasionados em resina composta após aplicação de peróxido de hidrogênio 35%. Material e método: Confeccionaram-se 20 amostras de resina composta Opallis (FGM), cor A1, em matriz metálica circular. As amostras foram divididas em quatro grupos (n=5) dos seguintes agentes corantes: água destilada (controle), café, vinho tinto e Coca-Cola®. No manchamento, as amostras ficaram imersas nas soluções durante 72 horas, com troca diária das bebidas. Procedeu-se à aplicação do gel de peróxido de hidrogênio 35% (Whiteness HP Blue Calcium, FGM) em três sessões, sendo uma aplicação do gel por sessão, o qual permaneceu nas amostras durante 40 minutos. Medidas de cor foram feitas inicialmente, após manchamento, após aplicação do peróxido e por mais 21 dias, usando espectrofotômetro Vita Easyshade. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância de dois fatores (tempo vs. corante) e ao teste de Tukey, para o contraste das médias (alfa=0,05). Resultado: Apresentaram alteração de cor (delta E - média/desvio padrão de L*) o café (15,7 ± 2,0) e o vinho (15,2 ± 4,6), quando comparados à Coca-Cola® (4,8 ± 1,9). O peróxido de hidrogênio removeu a pigmentação das amostras, porém, para nenhum dos corantes, houve retorno à coloração inicial, principalmente no grupo manchado por café (12,9 ± 1,5); este mostrou diferença significativa quando comparado ao controle (1,6 ± 0,6), diferentemente do vinho (3,3 ± 0,6) e da Coca-Cola® (2,1 ± 0,9), que se aproximaram do grupo controle. Conclusão: As soluções corantes pigmentaram a resina composta, principalmente o café. A aplicação do peróxido de hidrogênio 35% foi eficaz na remoção de pigmentos das amostras, porém, em nenhum dos grupos, com diferentes corantes, houve retorno à coloração inicial (p> 0,005).

Objective: Evaluate in vitro the ability to removal pigments of composite resin after application of hydrogen peroxide 35%. Material and method: Concocted to-20 resin samples composed Opallis (FGM), A1 color, in circular metal matrix. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 5) the following coloring agents: distilled water (control), coffee, red wine and Coca-Cola®. In the staining, the samples were immersed in the solutions for 72 hours, with daily change of beverages. Proceeded to the application of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP Blue Calcium, FGM) in 3 sessions, one application of gel per session that remained in the samples for 40 minutes. Color measurements were made initially after staining after application of the peroxide and for 21 days using Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alfa = 0.05). Result: Significant color change was observed in specimens after immersion in the solutions, except the control group. Hydrogen peroxide was capable of removing the stains, however the color did not return to the baseline in any of the staining groups, especially for the groups immersed in coffee. Conclusion: Staining solutions can stain the composite resin. The application of 35% hydrogen peroxide can remove partially the staining, minimizing the color change produced by the staining solutions. However, the bleaching gel was not capable of removing all staining, especially for the coffee group.