ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder attribute a causal role to maladaptive beliefs. AIMS: To test this hypothesis, we manipulated Overimportance of Thoughts (OT) beliefs and experimentally evaluated their effect on the response to an induced aggressive impulse. METHOD: Eighty-five participants completed a battery of self-report instruments assessing obsession symptoms, thought control, affectivity and obsessive beliefs, and were then randomly assigned to two conditions. In the experimental condition participants read a scientific abstract on the importance of thought control whilst those in the control condition read a neutral abstract. All participants identified a loved person and imagined feeling the impulse to stab this person, then completed again OT beliefs measures (Overimportance of Thought, Moral-Thought Action Fusion and Thought Action Fusion Likelihood). RESULTS: The Moral component of the Thought Action Fusion was reduced by reading a brief text about the possibility and desirability of thought control. However, experimentally induced changes in beliefs did not yield differences in the intrusiveness of the aggressive impulse. CONCLUSIONS: Some beliefs can be modified through a single session in which information similar to what could be obtained in quotidian life is provided.
Subject(s)
Aggression , Causality , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Obsessive Behavior , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Emotions , HumansABSTRACT
The national survey on the trainees in this specialty was conducted to find out the trainees' opinions and expectations regarding postgraduated in Gynecology and Obstetrics and professional opportunities. A total of 320 questionnaires were send to all the trainees registered with the Portuguese Medical Association. Some of the topics of this survey were: structure and quality; curriculum requirements; assessment and professional opportunities. We received a total of 109 replies, which are presented in this article.
