Portuguese Advance Directives-a twist against futility? A cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Advance Directive documents allow citizens to choose the treatments they want for end-of-life care without considering therapeutic futility. OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients' and caregivers' answers to Advance Directives and understand their expectations regarding their decisions. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study analyzed participants' answers to a previously published trial, conceived to test the document's efficacy as a communication tool. METHODS: Sixty palliative patients and 60 caregivers (n = 120) registered their preferences in the Advance Directive document and expressed their expectations regarding whether to receive the chosen treatments. RESULTS: In the patient and caregiver groups, 30% and 23.3% wanted to receive cardiorespiratory resuscitation; 23.3% and 25% wanted to receive artificial organ support; and 40% and 35% chose to receive artificial feeding and hydration, respectively. The participants ignored the concept of therapeutic futility and expected to receive invasive treatments. The concept of therapeutic futility should be addressed and discussed with both the patients and caregivers. Legal Advanced Directive documents should be made clear to reduce misinterpretations and potential legal conflicts. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest that all citizens should be clarified regarding the futility concept before filling out the Advance Directives and propose a grammatical change in the document, replacing the phrase "Health Care to Receive / Not to Receive" with the sentence "Health Care to Accept / Refuse" so that patients cannot demand treatments, but instead accept or refuse the proposed therapeutic plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05090072.

Portuguese Advance Directives-a twist against futility? A cross sectional study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Advance Directive documents allow citizens to choose the treatments they want for end-of-life care without considering therapeutic futility. OBJECTIVES: To analyze patients' and caregivers' answers to Advance Directives and understand their expectations regarding their decisions. DESIGN AND SETTING: This study analyzed participants' answers to a previously published trial, conceived to test the document's efficacy as a communication tool. METHODS: Sixty palliative patients and 60 caregivers (n = 120) registered their preferences in the Advance Directive document and expressed their expectations regarding whether to receive the chosen treatments. RESULTS: In the patient and caregiver groups, 30% and 23.3% wanted to receive cardiorespiratory resuscitation; 23.3% and 25% wanted to receive artificial organ support; and 40% and 35% chose to receive artificial feeding and hydration, respectively. The participants ignored the concept of therapeutic futility and expected to receive invasive treatments. The concept of therapeutic futility should be addressed and discussed with both the patients and caregivers. Legal Advanced Directive documents should be made clear to reduce misinterpretations and potential legal conflicts. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest that all citizens should be clarified regarding the futility concept before filling out the Advance Directives and propose a grammatical change in the document, replacing the phrase "Health Care to Receive / Not to Receive" with the sentence "Health Care to Accept / Refuse" so that patients cannot demand treatments, but instead accept or refuse the proposed therapeutic plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05090072.

Advance directives in palliative care-a new tool to improve the communication between patients and caregivers?

BACKGROUND: In palliative care, caregivers frequently act as surrogate decision-makers, but their knowledge of patients' preferences for end-of-life care is sometimes scarce and incorrect. Advance Directives might be a powerful communication tool to promote the dialogue between patients and caregivers. AIMS: This work aims to find evidence supporting the use of the Advance Directives documents by health practitioners as a communication tool to improve caregivers' capacity as health surrogates in palliative care. METHODS: A literature review was conducted in four databases-Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane to identify studies published until February 27th, 2021, analysing advance directive's use as a communication tool between palliative patients and their caregivers. FINDINGS: Of the 1251 papers screened, only one article met the defined criteria, presenting results statistically favourable to advance directive's use, although with the risk of significant bias. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results seem promising, more studies are needed to validate this strategy scientifically.

Advanced directives' knowledge among Portuguese palliative patients and caregivers: do the sociodemographic factors influence it? A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: The influence of demographic factors on the completion and knowledge of the Portuguese Advance Directives (PAD) and the Health Care Proxy's (HCP) role is still not clear. OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic features associated with knowledge and adherence to PAD and HCP in palliative care. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional analysis of the sociodemographic data, PAD and HCP role knowledge, and PAD Register from a group of Portuguese palliative patients and their caregivers enrolled on the DAVPAL trial to test the PAD efficacy in promoting better concordance between patients and caregivers. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty participants (60 palliative patients and 60 caregivers). METHODS: After enrollment, the participants' sociodemographic data was acquired, their knowledge of PAD and the role of an HCP was questioned, and their prior register of the PAD was asked. RESULTS: 60 patients and 60 caregivers were included (n=120), with differences among them regarding age (p<.001), gender (p=.003), education (p<.001), job (p<.001), marital status (p=.043), and access to the internet (p=.003), but not regarding religion (p=.21). Only 13.3% of the participants were aware of PAD, 15.0% were aware of the HCP role, and 5.0% had previously filled a PAD. Religious beliefs (Non-Catholic) were the only sociodemographic factor significantly related to these three topics. CONCLUSIONS: There is low awareness of PAD and the HCP's role in palliative care, and there is higher knowledge on these topics among non-Catholic individuals. End-of-life decisions seem to be influenced by similarities in religious beliefs between patients and HCP. Improving education is necessary, namely in palliative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072 . Retrospectively registered on 22/10/2021.

Do surrogates predict patient preferences more accurately after a physician-led discussion about advance directives? A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers frequently assume the role of surrogate decision-makers but often are unable to accurately predict patients' preferences. This trial aims to find if the use of the Advance Directives documents as a communication tool, improves the agreement between patients and caregivers. METHODS: This trial occurred in a palliative care service of a Portuguese hospital center. A prospective, single-blinded, controlled, randomized trial, enrolling patients and caregivers as a dyad was conducted. Participants individually fulfilled an Advance Directive document, in which patients reported their end-of-life preferences and caregivers reported their decisions as patients' health surrogates. Dyads were randomly assigned to the Intervention or the Control group, in which the physician respectively promoted an open discussion about patients' Advance Directives or evaluated patients' clinical condition. Caregivers' Advance Directives as surrogates were collected one month later. Proportions of agreement and Cohen's κ were used to access agreement and reliability, respectively, between the dyads. RESULTS: Results from 58 dyads were analyzed. We observed an improvement in agreement between the caregivers' answers and the patients' wishes on two-thirds (8/12) of the answers, in the Intervention group, contrasting to one-quarter (3/12) of the answers, in the Control group, despite statistical significance in differences wasn´t obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although not reaching statistical significance, the results suggest that discussions of advance directives with physicians may lead to better prepared surrogates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05090072 . Retrospectively registered on 22/10/2021.