Expression patterns of B cells in acute kidney transplant rejection.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate B-cell expression patterns and association with function and survival in dysfunctional kidney allografts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 110 kidney transplant recipients included who had for-cause biopsies. Demographic and transplant data were collected. Immunostaining for B cells, plasma cells, and C4d was performed by the immunoperoxidase technique in paraffin-embedded samples. Circulating antihuman leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies were detected in a single-antigen assay at biopsy. The main outcomes were kidney graft survival and function. The patients were evaluated in 3 groups according to the Banff classification: no rejection (40 patients), T-cell-mediated rejection (50 patients), and antibody-mediated rejection (20 patients). RESULTS: The CD138-positive plasma cell-rich infiltrates predominated in antibody-mediated rejection and were associated with stronger reactivity against panel antibodies (r = 0.41; P ≤ .001) and positive donor-specific antibodies (r = 0.32; P ≤ .006). The CD20-positive lymphocytes were associated with T-cell-mediated rejection, increased human leukocyte antigen mismatch, and frequency of retransplant. The CD138-positive cell infiltrates also were significantly greater in patients who had late than early rejection. There was no correlation between cellular CD20 and CD138 expression, and neither CD20 nor CD138 predicted worse graft function or survival. Other markers of antibody-mediated rejection such as C4d and donor-specific antibodies were associated with worse graft function and survival at 4 years after transplant. In multivariate analysis, C4d was the only risk factor associated with graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: After kidney transplant, CD20-positive B-cell infiltrates were associated with T-cell-mediated rejection, and CD138-positive plasma cells were associated with antibody-mediated rejection. Graft loss was associated with the presence of C4d.

Análise da detecção de C4d, linfócitos B e plasmócitos no processo de rejeição ao aloenxerto renal / Analysis of C4d, B lymphocytes and plasma cells detection in the renal allograft rejection

A rejeição ao aloenxerto mediada por mecanismos celulares ou humorais representa uma importante complicação no pós-transplante renal. Estudos anteriores demonstraram que o depósito de C4d peritubular é um marcador de rejeição mediada por anticorpos. A técnica padrão ouro para a pesquisa de C4d é a imunofluorescência em criostato. No entanto, o manuseio do material congelado implica em algumas limitações custo-operacionais, particularmente em nosso meio. Nos casos de rejeição mediada por anticorpos é de relevância patogenética a análise da participação de linfócitos B e plasmócitos, pois são as células responsáveis pela produção de anticorpos. Considerando que até o momento o envolvimento de linfócitos B e plasmócitos no processo de rejeição foi pouco investigado, no presente estudo também será analisada a expressão de CD20 e CD138 em biópsias renais, para caracterização destes componentes celulares. Portanto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar a detecção do fragmento C4d por meio de 4 diferentes técnicas, além de analisar o infiltrado de linfócitos B e plasmócitos em biópsias de enxerto renal, correlacionando estes achados com o C4d peritubular. Foram analisadas 107 biópsias de 82 pacientes submetidos a transplante renal. A pesquisa do C4d foi realizada utilizando-se as técnicas de imunofluorescência [IF] (em cortes de criostato e de parafina) e imuno-histoquímica [IH] (em cortes de criostato e de parafina), enquanto que as pesquisas dos linfócitos B e plasmócitos foram realizadas pela técnica de IH em cortes de parafina utilizando-se os anticorpos anti-CD20 e anti-CD138, específicos para linfócitos B e plasmócitos, respectivamente. Com relação à detecção de C4d, as técnicas com maior índice de concordância com a IF-criostato, considerada padrão-ouro, foram IH-criostato (75,6% dos casos apresentaram resultados coincidentes, r=0,72; p<0,0001) e IF-parafina (73%, r=0,59; p=0,0001), enquanto a taxa de concordância na técnica de IH-parafina...

Allograft rejection mediated by cellular or humoral mechanisms represents an important complication after kidney transplantation. Capillary C4d deposition was recognized as a specific and independent prognostic marker of antibody mediated rejection. The gold standard technique for C4d detection is the immunofluorescence in cryostat sections. However, this technique involves some operating and costs limitations, particularly in Brazil. In antibody mediated rejection, the analysis of B lymphocytes and plasma cells is of pathogenetic relevance since these cells are responsible for antibody production. Considering that the involvement of B lymphocytes and plasma cells in the rejection process is not clear, in this study the CD20 and CD138 expression in kidney biopsies will be also analyzed. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the C4d detection by 4 different techniques and the infiltration of B lymphocytes and plasma cells in renal allograft biopsies, correlating these findings with the capillary C4d deposition. One hundred and seven biopsies of 82 renal transplant patients were analyzed. C4d was evaluated by immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques in frozen and paraffin sections (obtained from the same patients), whereas B-lymphocytes and plasma cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry in paraffin sections using specific antibodies anti-B Lymphocytes (CD20) and anti-plasma cells (CD138). Regarding the C4d detection, the techniques with higher concordance rate with frozen-IF, considered the gold standard, were the frozen-IHC technique (85.4% of cases showed coincident results, r=0.72; p<0.0001) and the paraffin-IF technique (73%, r=0.59; p=0.0001), where as the concordance rate in the paraffin-IHC technique was only 51.4% (r=0.35; p=0.03). The clinical follow up analysis demonstrate that C4d positive group was associated with a poor graft survival at 3 years post-diagnosis (67% vs 96% in C4d negative group; p=0.01)...