ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with overactive bladder may cycle through different antimuscarinic medications even though there is limited evidence to support this approach. OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment patterns and the associated health care resource utilisation (HCRU) according to antimuscarinic cycling groups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The CYCLe AntiMuscarinics in ENgland (CYCLAMEN) study was a retrospective observational investigation that used primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database linked to Hospital Episode Statistics secondary care data. Eligible patients (≥18 yr) were prescribed their first antimuscarinic between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients were categorised into groups prescribed one, two, or three or more (groups 1-3) consecutive unique antimuscarinics over 18 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The HCRU rate and costs were calculated for the period of continuous antimuscarinic therapy (first antimuscarinic treatment episode) and the 18-mo follow-up period. Treatment sequence patterns were displayed using sunburst plots and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess time on treatment. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 35 369 patients were included, of whom 31 760 (89.8%) received one antimuscarinic (group 1), 3182 (9.0%) received two (group 2), and 427 (1.2%) received three or more (group 3). The most common initial antimuscarinics were solifenacin (13 628 patients, 42.9%) in group 1, and oxybutynin in group 2 (1267 patients, 39.8%) and group 3 (200 patients, 46.8%). The median duration of the first antimuscarinic treatment episode was 57 d and <20% of patients were receiving any antimuscarinic after 18 mo. The number of primary care visits and mean costs increased across groups. The reasons for cycling could not be identified in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 10% of patients underwent sequential cycling with two or more antimuscarinics. Furthermore, as the majority discontinued treatment within 18 mo, there is a need to improve the management of these patients in the clinical care setting. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated treatment patterns and health care use for patients with overactive bladder who were prescribed at least one antimuscarinic drug (AMD), which are drugs that reduce some of the impulses passing from the bladder to the brain. Around 10% of patients accessing primary health care in England received more than one sequential AMD. Most patients discontinued treatment, which may indicate inadequate management of their condition. Prescription of a higher number of AMDs was associated with higher health care costs.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the economic impact associated with overactive bladder (OAB) patients, treated with mirabegron or antimuscarinics (AM) in Spain, over a 12-month period. Methods: A probabilistic model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) was used in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients with OAB and a time horizon of 12 months. The use of resources was obtained from the retrospective observational study MIRACAT that included 3330 patients with OAB. The analysis was carried out from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) including that of society with the indirect cost of abseenteism in a sensitivity analysis. Unit costs were obtained from Spanish public healthcare prices ( 2021) and from previously published Spanish studies. Results: The annual average savings for the NHS for each patient with OAB treated with mirabegron would be 1135 (95%confidence interval (CI) 390; 2421) compared with a patient treated with AM. Annual average savings were maintained in all the sensitivity analyses carried out, ranging from a minimum of 299 to a maximum of 3381 per patient. The substitution of 25% of the AM treatments (for 81534 patients) to mirabegron would generate, within 1 year, savings for the NHS of 92 million (95% CI 31; 197 million). Conclusions: According to the present model, the treatment of OAB with mirabegron would generate savings compared with treatment with AM in all scenarios and sensitivity analysis performed, and for the NHS and for society perspectives (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder, Overactive/economics , Muscarinic Antagonists/economics , Muscarinic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Retrospective Studies , SpainABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Combination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate-to-severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence with an AB plus AM fixed-dose combination (FDC) vs an AB plus AM free-dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain. METHODS: Retrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA Cegedim Electronic Medical Records database. Men prescribed AB plus AM combination therapy were included in an FDC or free-dose combination cohort based on their index treatment. Treatment persistence was the time from index date to first discontinuation of ≥1 of the two index drugs over 12 months. Adherence was measured using the fixed medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Of 3114 patients identified, 999 were included (FDC, n = 790; free-dose combination, n = 209). Median (95% CI) persistence was longer in the FDC (125 [109-151] days) than in the free-dose combination (31 [31-36] days) cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4-3.4; P < .0001). The 12-month persistence rates were 31.1% (FDC cohort) and 8.9% (free-dose cohort). The mean (SD) fixed MPR was higher in the FDC cohort (48.8 [37.2]) compared with the free-dose cohort (23.1 [28.4]); more patients in the FDC cohort (34.2%) than in the free-dose cohort (10.0%) were adherent (MPR ≥ 80%). The probability of treatment persistence and adherence increased with age (>80 vs <65 years, persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]; MPR difference, 12.5), polypharmacy (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9]; MPR difference, 10.7) and previous use of AB (persistence HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-1.0]; MPR difference, 5.7) or AB/AM combinations (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]; MPR difference, 11.1). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with an AB/AM FDC is associated with better persistence and adherence vs a free-dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain.
