Evaluation of the use of cefuroxime and cefuroxime axetil in an intravenous-oral stepdown program.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize cefuroxime and cefuroxime axetil use under the influence of a parenteral-to-oral (iv-po) stepdown program. DESIGN: Open single-center retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching and referral Canadian hospital with 1100 beds. PATIENTS: A random sample of 78 patients receiving cefuroxime was compared with a random sample of 50 patients receiving iv-po cefuroxime stepdown. RESULTS: During the first 6 months following formulary introduction, 1535 patients received cefuroxime. Stepdown to any oral antibiotic occurred in 22% of patients. Cefuroxime axetil was used as the stepdown agent in 64% of these cases. In a comparison of nonstepdown courses with stepdown courses, some differences were apparent. Nonstepdown treatment courses were primarily prophylactic, whereas stepdown courses were typically initiated as primary therapy for the 10-day management of respiratory tract infections (p < 0.001). Conversion to oral therapy typically occurred on day 5 of parenteral therapy and continued for 5 days. Stepdown was considered possible in 46% of treatment courses in which this process did not happen. When stepdown did occur, it was considered timely in 64% of cases, unnecessarily delayed in 32%, and premature in 4% of treatment courses. Stepdown did not appear to be associated with a negative impact on patient outcome. Mean +/- SD cost of drug therapy per day was less for the stepdown group (US $15.78 +/- $5.97) than the nonstepdown group (US $25.47 +/- $7.87; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study we intend to maintain cefuroxime and cefuroxime axetil on the formulary and continue to judiciously promote the timely conversion to oral therapy.

Ciprofloxacin use under a reserved drug and stepdown promotion program.

This study retrospectively evaluated the use of parenteral ciprofloxacin (PC) under the influence of a reserved antimicrobial drug program and an intravenous-oral stepdown program. During the first three months following its formulary introduction, 92 PC treatment courses were initiated. Fifty of these treatment courses in 49 adults were randomly selected for study. The hematology service accounted for 50% of the courses reviewed. The balance were initiated in the intensive care unit (16%), and six other services (34%). PC was used for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (50%), respiratory tract infections (20%), gram-negative sepsis (10%), and five other indications. Initial use of the intravenous formulation was considered appropriate in 92% of courses. Stepdown therapy occurred in 17 (34%) of treatment courses. Of the 26 patients considered candidates for oral therapy, seven patients (27%) were eligible for earlier stepdown and nine patients (35%) did not receive oral drug. According to our criteria, unnecessary use of the intravenous route occurred in 20% of PC treatment days. Mean total cost (acquisition plus delivery) of therapy per course was $668. This cost was higher in the hematology service (mean $990) than any other service (p = 0.0015). When stepdown therapy was employed the mean daily cost of therapy was $43.63 vs. $55.61 when the oral dosage form was not used (p = 0.04). Parenteral drug costs totalling $6245 were avoided by subsequent use of the oral dosage form. If full compliance with stepdown criteria had occurred, an estimated total savings of $10,769 could have been realized.

Implementation and evaluation of a standardized herpes simplex virus prophylaxis protocol on a leukemia/bone marrow transplant unit.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a standardized acyclovir prophylaxis protocol for the prevention of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection and disease in bone marrow transplant and leukemic patients. DESIGN: Two-phase, open sequential study involving prospective patient monitoring and retrospective health record review. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-seven patients (35 preprotocol, 22 postprotocol) who received acyclovir for HSV prophylaxis during an 18-month study period. INTERVENTIONS: An acyclovir HSV prophylaxis protocol was developed and implemented. Under this protocol, all HSV immunoglobulin G-seropositive hematology patients received an acyclovir regimen of 125 mg/m2 i.v. q6h or 600 mg p.o. q6h (if tolerated) from day -5 to day 30. Regimens not matching protocol were modified by pharmacists in conjunction with the prescriber. All treatment courses were followed daily by pharmacists to modify dosage according to renal function and assess appropriateness of the i.v. route. Tablets, capsules, or suspensions were promoted if the patient was considered tolerant of the oral route. MAIN OUTCOME PARAMETERS: Outcome parameters included (1) incidence of parenteral, oral, or combined therapy; (2) total prophylactic acyclovir dose per patient; (3) mean prophylactic acyclovir daily dose; (4) mean duration of acyclovir prophylaxis; and (5) HSV reactivation rate. RESULTS: Following implementation of the protocol, the mean total i.v. acyclovir dose per patient decreased from 20.1 g (range 3.6-109.5) to 11.7 g (range 1.0-43.0; p = 0.1162). The mean cumulative oral dose increased from 12.1 g (range 0.4-70.0) to 33.1 g (range 2.4-93.6; p = 0.0007). Mean duration of therapy increased from 27.6 to 33.5 days (p = 0.23). The mean duration of oral therapy increased from 10.5 days (+/- SD 10.9) to 17.2 days (+/- SD 12.1) (p = 0.034). The appropriateness of use of the i.v. dosage form increased from 53 to 88 percent of treatment days (p = 0.013). No difference in HSV reactivation rate was observed when comparing patients prior to and following protocol implementation. A drug acquisition savings of $1112.00 (CDN) per patient was realized. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a standardized HSV acyclovir prophylaxis protocol has resulted in significant drug acquisition cost savings without an apparent negative impact on patient outcome.

Assessment of patient acceptance and inhalation technique of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices.

OBJECTIVE: To assess inhalation technique in patients after written instruction alone, written and verbal instruction, and clinical use of two new inhalation devices. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover evaluation of the albuterol Diskhaler and the terbutaline Turbuhaler. SETTING: Canadian tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty hospitalized adults with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease currently using an albuterol metered-dose inhaler (MDI). Nineteen patients received Diskhaler, 16 received Turbuhaler, 15 received both inhalers, and 10 patients used both inhalers for three days each. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either Diskhaler or Turbuhaler for three days. Inhaler technique was assessed after written instruction, written plus verbal instruction, at the first scheduled dose after instruction, and after three days of clinical use. Patients remaining in the hospital after three days crossed over to the other study inhaler and the same protocol was followed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient inhalation technique was assessed and compared for the MDI, Diskhaler, and Turbuhaler. RESULTS: Assessment of MDI technique revealed that 35 percent of patients used their MDI correctly on the first puff, and 42 percent used it correctly on the second puff. Following written instruction alone, correct technique was demonstrated by 32 percent of patients with Diskhaler and 6 percent with Turbuhaler. Technique significantly improved following verbal instruction, although 40 percent of the patients required up to three attempts to demonstrate correct technique on at least one of the study inhalers. After three days of clinical use, correct technique was demonstrated in only 54 percent of the Diskhaler and 64 percent of the Turbuhaler assessments. Performance at this assessment was, however, significantly better on the Turbuhaler than on the MDI (p = 0.01). Performance on the Diskhaler was not significantly different from the performance on the other inhalers. CONCLUSIONS: Written instruction alone is inadequate in teaching correct inhalation technique. Verbal instruction and technique assessment are essential for patients to achieve proper technique. Patients may perform better on the Turbuhaler than on other inhalation devices.

Intravenous-to-oral stepdown program: four years of experience in a large teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an intravenous-to-oral (iv-po) stepdown program on the relative use of oral and parenteral dosage forms of select antimicrobials. DESIGN: A retrospective review of drug utilization records before and after a trial comparing metronidazole and clindamycin prescribing trends from a 12-month baseline period to a four-year follow-up period. SETTING: One thousand-bed Canadian tertiary care referral teaching center. INTERVENTION: An authorized iv-po stepdown program was developed to promote the oral route of drug administration. Reminders of iv-po stepdown were produced for metronidazole and clindamycin and these notes were sent to nursing units with the parenteral dosage form. The notes then were attached to the front of the health record to serve as a reminder to prescribers that an equally effective, well-tolerated, and less-expensive oral dosage form was available for use. RESULTS: A 44 percent relative increase in the use of oral metronidazole and a 79 percent relative increase in the use of oral clindamycin occurred. When acquisition and delivery costs were considered, cumulative cost savings from 1988 to 1991 resulted for metronidazole ($31,920) and clindamycin ($53,880). CONCLUSIONS: This intervention represents a simple yet effective method of promoting a process of stepdown from parenteral to oral antibiotic therapy.