Consensus document on the primary prevention of cow's milk protein allergy in infants aged less than 7 days.

INTRODUCTION: Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most frequent food allergy in the first year of life. There is no clear consensus regarding its prevention. A recommendation to avoid CMP in the first week of life as a preventive measure in all infants, regardless of their atopic risk, has recently been published. The purpose of this document is to issue a recommendation on the use of extensively hydrolyzed CMP formulas in the first week of life for the primary prevention of CMPA. METHODS: A group of experts was formed with members proposed by the Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), the Spanish Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergology and Pediatric Asthma (SEICAAP), the Spanish Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SEGHNP) and the Spanish Society of Neonatology (SENEO). The group conducted a critical review of the evidence on the subject published in the last 10 years. RESULTS: The search yielded 72 studies, of which 66 were rejected for not meeting the inclusion criteria. The final review included 6 documents: 3 clinical trials and 3 systematic reviews, 2 of them with meta-analysis. There was no evidence of a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CMPA in the infants who received hypoallergenic formulae or exclusive breastfeeding. CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, it is not possible to draw clear conclusions about the effect of avoiding CMP in the first week of life for prevention of CMPA. Although there are data that suggest a certain beneficial effect of avoiding CMPA in atopic risk infants, these results are not conclusive enough to extend the recommendation to the general population.

Documento de consenso en la prevención primaria de alergia a proteínas de leche de vaca en lactantes menores de 7 días de vida / Consensus document on the primary prevention of cow's milk protein allergy in infants aged less than 7days

Introducción: La alergia a las proteínas de la leche de vaca (APLV) es la alergia alimentaria más frecuente en el primer año de vida. No existe un consenso claro respecto a su prevención. Recientemente se ha publicado la recomendación de evitar estas proteínas en la primera semana de vida como medida de prevención en todos los niños, con independencia de su riesgo atópico. El objetivo de este documento es emitir una recomendación sobre el uso de fórmulas extensamente hidrolizadas de PLV en la primera semana de vida para la prevención primaria de la APLV. Métodos: Se constituyó un grupo de expertos propuestos por la Asociación Española de Pediatría (AEP), la Sociedad Española de Inmunología Clínica y Alergología y Asma Pediátrica (SEICAAP), la Sociedad Española de Gastroenterología, Hepatología y Nutrición Pediátrica (SEGHNP) y la Sociedad Española de Neonatología (SENEO). Se realizó una revisión crítica de la evidencia publicada en los últimos 10 años sobre el tema. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 72 estudios, de los cuales 66 fueron rechazados por no cumplir los criterios de inclusión. Se incluyeron en la revisión 6 documentos: 3 ensayos clínicos y 3 revisiones sistemáticas, 2de ellas con metaanálisis. No se observó una reducción estadísticamente significativa en la incidencia de APLV en los grupos de lactantes que recibieron fórmulas hipoalergénicas ni lactancia materna exclusiva. Conclusión: Con base en las evidencias existentes en la actualidad, no se pueden establecer conclusiones claras acerca del efecto de evitar las PLV durante la primera semana de vida en la prevención de la APLV. A pesar de existir datos que pudieran orientar a un cierto efecto beneficioso de su evitación en niños con riesgo atópico, estos resultados no son concluyentes ni generalizables a lactantes sin dicho riesgo. (AU)

Introduction: Cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) is the most frequent food allergy in the first year of life. There is no clear consensus regarding its prevention. A recommendation to avoid CMP in the first week of life as a preventive measure in all infants, regardless of their atopic risk, has recently been published. The purpose of this document is to issue a recommendation on the use of extensively hydrolyzed CMP formulas in the first week of life for the primary prevention of CMPA. Methods: A group of experts was formed with members proposed by the Spanish Association of Pediatrics (AEP), the Spanish Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergology and Pediatric Asthma (SEICAAP), the Spanish Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SEGHNP) and the Spanish Society of Neonatology (SENEO). The group conducted a critical review of the evidence on the subject published in the last 10 years. Results: The search yielded 72 studies, of which 66 were rejected for not meeting the inclusion criteria. The final review included 6 documents: 3 clinical trials and 3 systematic reviews, 2 of them with meta-analysis. There was no evidence of a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CMPA in the infants who received hypoallergenic formulae or exclusive breastfeeding. Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, it is not possible to draw clear conclusions about the effect of avoiding CMP in the first week of life for prevention of CMPA. Although there are data that suggest a certain beneficial effect of avoiding CMPA in atopic risk infants, these results are not conclusive enough to extend the recommendation to the general population. (AU)

Egg oral immunotherapy in children (SEICAP I): Daily or weekly desensitization pattern.

BACKGROUND: Studies are required before incorporating egg oral immunotherapy (OIT) into clinical practice. The Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP) conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled study assessing the effectiveness and safety of the OIT using pasteurized egg white (PEW) in egg-allergic children. METHODS: One hundred and one egg-allergic children (6-9 years) were randomized for 1 year: 25 to an egg-free-diet (CG) and 76 to OIT (target dose 3.3 g PEW proteins), PI (30% weekly plus 5% daily increments) or PII (only 30% weekly increments) buildup patterns. Egg skin prick test, sIgE and sIgG4 serum levels, PEW double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), and dosing adverse reactions (DARs) were evaluated in all patients from inclusion (T0) until completing 1 year of follow-up (T12). At T12, egg-allergic control patients could start OIT. The effectiveness and safety of OIT and the effect of the buildup pattern were analyzed. RESULTS: At T12, 4/25 (16.0%) CG patients passed the PEW DBPCFC vs 64/76 (84.2%) OIT that reached total desensitization (P = 0.000); 12 egg-allergic control patients started OIT. Finally, 72/88 (81.81%) patients reached total desensitization, 96.15% PI vs 75.80% on PII (P = 0.01). Induction period (121.12 ± 91.43, median 98.00 days) was longer in patients on PII buildup pattern, and those with allergic asthma, minor threshold dose, or higher egg sIgE (P < 0.05). Most patients (89.06%) developed DARs: 74.53% were mild; 21.90% moderate; and 3.5% requiring adrenaline-treatment. Moderate reactions and those requiring adrenaline were more frequent in patients with allergic asthma, PII pattern, or higher egg sIgE serum antibody levels (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PEW OIT is an effective treatment for children with persistent egg allergy. A 30% weekly plus 5% daily increment pattern could be more effective and safer than one with only 30% weekly increments.

Egg OIT in clinical practice (SEICAP II): Maintenance patterns and desensitization state after normalizing the diet.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown which are the most suitable maintenance pattern and egg consumption to maintain the desensitization state after ending the oral immunotherapy (OIT). This multicenter, randomized, controlled trial compared two OIT maintenance patterns with pasteurized egg white (PEW), evaluating the egg consumption effect on the desensitization state after ending the OIT. METHODS: One hundred and one children with confirmed egg allergy were randomized: 25 to an egg-free diet (CG) and 76 to an OIT year with PEW and two maintenance patterns, 38 patients to daily 3.3 g proteins (AG) and 38 to every two days (BG). PEW challenge (DBPCFC), adverse reactions, and immune markers were assessed at baseline, at the end of the OIT, and at 6 and 12 months later on ad libitum egg consumption (T0, T12, T18, and T24). A questionnaire evaluated the egg consumption at T18. RESULTS: At T12, 64 of 76 (84.21%) OIT patients had reached total desensitization (32 AG and 32 BG) vs 4 of 25 (16.00%) CG who passed the PEW DBPCFC. Thirty (93.75%) AG vs 25 (78.12%) BG patients completed an OIT year. At T18, 27 of 29 (93.1%) AG vs 20 of 24 (83.3%) BG passed the PEW DBPCFC, 96% consuming at least two egg servings/week. At T24, 97.43% OIT patients passed the challenge. Most patients had adverse reactions, more frequent in the BG patients; frequency and severity of reactions decreased through the study. PEW skin prick test wheal and sIgE antibody serum levels similarly decreased in AG or BG, but AG patients had greater increase in PEW sIgG4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Daily OIT maintenance achieves better adherence, effectiveness, and safety. Two egg servings/week ensure maintained desensitization after the end of an OIT year.

Consensus document on the approach to children with allergic reactions after vaccination or allergy to vaccine components

Vaccinations are one of the main public health tools for the control of vaccine-preventable diseases. If a child is identified as having had an allergic reaction to a vaccine, subsequent immunisations will probably be suspended - with the risks such a decision implies. The incidence of severe allergic reactions is very low, ranging between 0.5 and 1 cases/100,000 doses. Rather than the vaccine antigens as such, the causes of allergic reactions to vaccines are often residual protein components of the manufacturing process such as gelatine or egg, and less commonly yeasts or latex. Most vaccine reactions are mild and circumscribed to the injection site; although in some cases severe anaphylactic reactions can be observed. If an immediate-type allergic reaction is suspected at vaccination, or if a child with allergy to some of the vaccine components is scheduled for vaccination, a correct diagnosis of the possible allergic process must be made. The usual vaccine components must be known in order to determine whether vaccination can be safely performed

No disponible

Consensus document on the approach to children with allergic reactions after vaccination or allergy to vaccine components.

Vaccinations are one of the main public health tools for the control of vaccine-preventable diseases. If a child is identified as having had an allergic reaction to a vaccine, subsequent immunisations will probably be suspended - with the risks such a decision implies. The incidence of severe allergic reactions is very low, ranging between 0.5 and 1 cases/100,000 doses. Rather than the vaccine antigens as such, the causes of allergic reactions to vaccines are often residual protein components of the manufacturing process such as gelatine or egg, and less commonly yeasts or latex. Most vaccine reactions are mild and circumscribed to the injection site; although in some cases severe anaphylactic reactions can be observed. If an immediate-type allergic reaction is suspected at vaccination, or if a child with allergy to some of the vaccine components is scheduled for vaccination, a correct diagnosis of the possible allergic process must be made. The usual vaccine components must be known in order to determine whether vaccination can be safely performed.

Hemos hecho historia / No disponible

No disponible

La SEICAP hacia una nueva etapa / No disponible

No disponible

La acreditación europea en alergología pediátrica: un reconocimiento y un compromiso / No disponible

No disponible

Wellcome to the first Paediatric Asthma Guidelines directed by phenotype / Bienvenidos a la Primera Guía de Asma Pediátrica basada en el fenotipo

No disponible

No disponible