Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Otol ; 20(3): 338-43, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10337975

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the hearing results of endolymphatic sac occlusion in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: The study design was a multiinstitutional retrospective case series. SETTING: The study was conducted at tertiary otologic referral centers. PATIENTS: The study included 10 previously unreported patients with progressive sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular aqueducts greater than 1.5 mm in diameter on computerized tomography. INTERVENTION: Occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct was performed by means of a transmastoid surgical approach. Either intraluminal endolymphatic sac obliteration (five patients) or extraluminal extradural endolymphatic sac obliteration (five patients) was accomplished with temporalis fascia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The postoperative pure tone average (PTA) and speech discrimination scores were compared with the preoperative levels using conventional audiometry. RESULTS: Nine of 10 patients experienced some degree of sensorineural hearing loss. The median change in PTA was a loss of 21 decibels (dB), and 50% of the patients experienced a sensorineural hearing loss greater than 25 dB. Postoperative change in PTA ranged from +10 dB to -59 dB. The median change in speech discrimination score was a loss of 27.5%. Only one patient had an improvement in both speech discrimination score and pure tone averages after surgery. Patients who underwent extraluminal occlusion had a median PTA loss of 12 dB, and patients who underwent open sac occlusion had a median PTA loss of 34 dB. These were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: In this series of 10 patients, 5 had a greater than 25 dB decrease in hearing after occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Surgical occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct showed no significant benefit in hearing preservation. The otologic surgeon is alerted to the potential for severe sensiorineural hearing loss after occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct.


Subject(s)
Endolymphatic Sac/abnormalities , Endolymphatic Sac/surgery , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Speech Perception/physiology , Syndrome
2.
Am J Otol ; 19(2): 145-51, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9520049

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of occlusion of the enlarged vestibular aqueduct to treat the progressive sensorineural hearing loss associated with the enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: Sixteen consecutive patients (29 affected ears) with progressive sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular aqueducts >1.5 mm in diameter without other inner ear anomalies participated in this study. INTERVENTION: In 10 patients with progressive hearing loss, the EVA was occluded in the ear with worse hearing by placing a fascia graft between the posterior fossa dura overlying the endolymphatic sac and intraosseous duct and the posterior semicircular canal without opening the endolymphatic sac. In the operative ears, serial postoperative audiograms were compared with the contralateral ear in patients with bilateral EVA and with the other nonoperated control ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rate of decline of pure-tone average and speech discrimination before surgery in the operated ear was compared with the rate of decline postoperatively in the same ear. The rates of decline in the nonoperated contralateral ear from the same patient and the nonoperated control ears from other patients were also used for comparison with the postoperative rate of decline in the operated ears. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant change in the rate of hearing loss in patients undergoing occlusion of the EVA. CONCLUSIONS: Extraluminal soft-tissue occlusion of the EVA appears to be a safe procedure but has not yet been shown to be significantly effective in altering the sensorineural hearing loss accompanying the EVA syndrome. Further surgical intervention does not appear warranted until such time that longitudinal follow-up shows sufficient evidence of efficacy of the procedure.


Subject(s)
Endolymphatic Sac/surgery , Vestibular Aqueduct/abnormalities , Vestibular Aqueduct/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...