ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop reliable biomarkers that improve the ability of bile cytology to diagnose cholangiocarcinoma vs benign biliary lesions. METHODS: Many studies indicate that microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential candidates for the early diagnosis of cancer. We analyzed the expression of five tumor-associated miRNAs (miR-31-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-378d, miR-182-5p, and miR-92a-3p) in cytology samples using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We collected 52 surgically resected tissue samples, 84 cytologic specimens from smears (53 cases of cancer and 31 cases of noncancer), and 40 residual sediments after smearing for routine cytology at Hiroshima University Hospital. RESULTS: The expression of miR-31-5p, miR-378d, and miR-122-5p was significantly higher in cancer tissues than those in normal tissues, while miR-182-5p expression was lower. The expression of miR-31-5p, miR-378d, miR-182-5p, and miR-92a-3p was significantly higher in detached cell samples from smears of cholangiocarcinoma cases than in those from noncancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the analysis of miRNAs in bile cytologic specimens is a promising auxiliary tool for distinguishing cholangiocarcinoma from benign biliary lesions.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms , Cholangiocarcinoma , MicroRNAs , Bile/metabolism , Bile Duct Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bile Duct Neoplasms/genetics , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cholangiocarcinoma/diagnosis , Cholangiocarcinoma/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , MicroRNAs/geneticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Although updated HER2 testing guidelines have been improved by a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) in 2013, HER2 evaluation is still problematic because of issues involving CEP17 polysomy, heterogeneity, and HER2 score 2+ cases. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between HER2 gene heterogeneity, or so called CEP17 polysomy, using breast carcinoma cells sampled by scraping and the IHC score graded by automated image analysis using whole slide image. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly selected 23 breast carcinoma cases with a HER2 score 0, 24 cases with a HER2 score 1+, 24 cases with HER2 score 2+, and 23 cases with HER2 score 3+ from the records of patients with breast cancer at Hiroshima University Hospital. We compared the results of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and cytological samples and compared the HER2 score calculated using an automated image analysis using wholly scanned slide images and visual counting. RESULTS: We successfully performed the FISH assay in 78 of 94 cases (83%) using FFPE tissues and in all 94 (100%) cases using cytological samples. Frequency of both HER2 amplification and CEP17 polysomy was higher when cytological samples were used than when FFPE tissue was used. Frequency of HER2 heterogeneity using cytological samples was higher that than using FFPE tissue, except for the IHC score 3+ cases. CONCLUSIONS: When assessment of HER2 status based on FISH using FFPE tissue cannot be accomplished, FISH using cytological samples should be considered. When intensity of HER2 is heterogeneous in the tumor tissue, particularly in cases regarded as score 2+, they should be evaluated by automated image analysis using the whole slide image.
