Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
J Infect Dis ; 224(6): 967-975, 2021 09 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153099

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early convalescent plasma transfusion may reduce mortality in patients with nonsevere coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study emulates a (hypothetical) target trial using observational data from a cohort of US veterans admitted to a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facility between 1 May and 17 November 2020 with nonsevere COVID-19. The intervention was convalescent plasma initiated within 2 days of eligibility. Thirty-day mortality was compared using cumulative incidence curves, risk differences, and hazard ratios estimated from pooled logistic models with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: Of 11 269 eligible person-trials contributed by 4755 patients, 402 trials were assigned to the convalescent plasma group. Forty and 671 deaths occurred within the plasma and nonplasma groups, respectively. The estimated 30-day mortality risk was 6.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-9.7%) in the plasma group and 6.2% (95% CI, 5.6%-7.0%) in the nonplasma group. The associated risk difference was 0.30% (95% CI, -2.30% to 3.60%) and the hazard ratio was 1.04 (95% CI, .64-1.62). CONCLUSIONS: Our target trial emulation estimated no meaningful differences in 30-day mortality between nonsevere COVID-19 patients treated and untreated with convalescent plasma. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04545047.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Immunization, Passive , Plasma , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Veterans , Young Adult , COVID-19 Serotherapy
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 574, 2019 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31785613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) for nonspecific low back pain (LBP) not adherent to clinical guidelines is linked with prolonged work disability. Although the prevalence of eMRI for occupational LBP varies substantially among states, it is unknown whether the risk of prolonged disability associated with eMRI varies according to individual and area-level characteristics. The aim was to explore whether the known risk of increased length of disability (LOD) associated with eMRI scanning not adherent to guidelines for occupational LBP varies according to patient and area-level characteristics, and the potential reasons for any observed variations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 59,360 LBP cases from 49 states, filed between 2002 and 2008, and examined LOD as the outcome. LBP cases with at least 1 day of work disability were identified by reviewing indemnity service records and medical bills using a comprehensive list of codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) indicating LBP or nonspecific back pain, excluding medically complicated cases. RESULTS: We found significant between-state variations in the negative impact of eMRI on LOD ranging from 3.4 days in Tennessee to 14.8 days in New Hampshire. Higher negative impact of eMRI on LOD was mainly associated with female gender, state workers' compensation (WC) policy not limiting initial treating provider choice, higher state orthopedic surgeon density, and lower state MRI facility density. CONCLUSION: State WC policies regulating selection of healthcare provider and structural factors affecting quality of medical care modify the impact of eMRI not adherent to guidelines. Targeted healthcare and work disability prevention interventions may improve work disability outcomes in patients with occupational LBP.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Low Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Personnel/trends , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology , Workers' Compensation/trends
4.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0178782, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28636610

ABSTRACT

An individual's chronotype reflects how the circadian system embeds itself into the 24-h day with rhythms in physiology, cognition and behavior occurring accordingly earlier or later. In view of an increasing number of people working at unusual times and linked health and safety risks, the wide range in human chronotypes may provide opportunities to allow people to work (and sleep) at times that are in synch with their circadian physiology. We aimed at estimating the distribution of chronotypes in the US population by age and sex. Twelve years (2003-2014) of pooled diary data from the American Time Use Survey were used to calculate chronotype based on mid-point of sleep on weekends (MSFWe, n = 53,689). We observed a near-normal distribution overall and within each age group. The distribution's mean value is systematically different with age, shifting later during adolescence, showing a peak in 'lateness' at ~19 years, and shifting earlier thereafter. Men are typically later chronotypes than women before 40, but earlier types after 40. The greatest differences are observed between 15 and 25 for both sexes, equaling more than 50% of the total chronotype difference across all age groups. The variability in chronotype decreases with age, but is generally higher in males than females. This is the first study to estimate the distribution and prevalence of individual chronotypes in the US population based on a large-scale, nationally representative sample. Our finding that adolescents are on average the latest chronotypes supports delaying school start times to benefit their sleep and circadian alignment. The generally wide range in chronotypes may provide opportunities for tailored work schedules by matching external and internal time, potentially decreasing long- and short-term health and safety risks.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Time Factors , United States , Young Adult
5.
PLoS One ; 12(5): e0176561, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28472065

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Falls are the leading cause of injury in almost all age-strata in the U.S. However, fall-related injuries (FI) and their circumstances are under-studied at the population level, particularly among young and middle-aged adults. This study examined the circumstances of FI among community-dwelling U.S. adults, by age and gender. METHODS: Narrative texts of FI from the National Health Interview Survey (1997-2010) were coded using a customized taxonomy to assess place, activity, initiating event, hazards, contributing factors, fall height, and work-relatedness of FI. Weighted proportions and incidence rates of FI were calculated across six age-gender groups (18-44, 45-64, 65+ years; women, men). RESULTS: The proportion of FI occurring indoors increased with age in both genders (22%, 30%, and 48% among men, and 40%, 49% and 62% among women for 18-44, 45-64, 65+ age-groups, respectively). In each age group the proportion of indoor FI was higher among women as compared to men. Among women, using the stairs was the second leading activity (after walking) at the time of FI (19%, 14% and 10% for women in 18-44, 45-64, 65+ age groups, respectively). FI associated with tripping increased with age among both genders, and women were more likely to trip than men in every age group. Of all age-gender groups, the rate of FI while using ladders was the highest among middle-aged men (3.3 per 1000 person-year, 95% CI 2.0, 4.5). Large objects, stairs and steps, and surface contamination were the three most common hazards noted for 15%, 14% and 13% of fall-related injuries, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and the circumstances of FI differ by age and gender. Understanding these differences and obtaining information about circumstances could be vital for developing effective interventions to prevent falls and FI.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 60(5): 472-483, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although regional socioeconomic (SE) factors have been associated with worse health outcomes, prior studies have not addressed important confounders or work disability. METHODS: A national sample of 59 360 workers' compensation (WC) cases to evaluate impact of regional SE factors on medical costs and length of disability (LOD) in occupational low back pain (LBP). RESULTS: Lower neighborhood median household incomes (MHI) and higher state unemployment rates were associated with longer LOD. Medical costs were lower in states with more workers receiving Social Security Disability, and in areas with lower MHI, but this varied in magnitude and direction among neighborhoods. Medical costs were higher in more urban, more racially diverse, and lower education neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Regional SE disparities in medical costs and LOD occur even when health insurance, health care availability, and indemnity benefits are similar. Results suggest opportunities to improve care and disability outcomes through targeted health care and disability interventions.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Low Back Pain/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Disabled Persons , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Sick Leave , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Workers' Compensation , Young Adult
7.
Accid Anal Prev ; 98: 359-371, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27863339

ABSTRACT

Injury narratives are now available real time and include useful information for injury surveillance and prevention. However, manual classification of the cause or events leading to injury found in large batches of narratives, such as workers compensation claims databases, can be prohibitive. In this study we compare the utility of four machine learning algorithms (Naïve Bayes, Single word and Bi-gram models, Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression) for classifying narratives into Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Injury and Illness event leading to injury classifications for a large workers compensation database. These algorithms are known to do well classifying narrative text and are fairly easy to implement with off-the-shelf software packages such as Python. We propose human-machine learning ensemble approaches which maximize the power and accuracy of the algorithms for machine-assigned codes and allow for strategic filtering of rare, emerging or ambiguous narratives for manual review. We compare human-machine approaches based on filtering on the prediction strength of the classifier vs. agreement between algorithms. Regularized Logistic Regression (LR) was the best performing algorithm alone. Using this algorithm and filtering out the bottom 30% of predictions for manual review resulted in high accuracy (overall sensitivity/positive predictive value of 0.89) of the final machine-human coded dataset. The best pairings of algorithms included Naïve Bayes with Support Vector Machine whereby the triple ensemble NBSW=NBBI-GRAM=SVM had very high performance (0.93 overall sensitivity/positive predictive value and high accuracy (i.e. high sensitivity and positive predictive values)) across both large and small categories leaving 41% of the narratives for manual review. Integrating LR into this ensemble mix improved performance only slightly. For large administrative datasets we propose incorporation of methods based on human-machine pairings such as we have done here, utilizing readily-available off-the-shelf machine learning techniques and resulting in only a fraction of narratives that require manual review. Human-machine ensemble methods are likely to improve performance over total manual coding.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Algorithms , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Bayes Theorem , Clinical Coding/methods , Humans , Logistic Models , Machine Learning , Models, Theoretical , Narration , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data
8.
Inj Prev ; 22(6): 427-431, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A common issue in descriptive injury epidemiology is that in order to calculate injury rates that account for the time spent in an activity, both injury cases and exposure time of specific activities need to be collected. In reality, few national surveys have this capacity. To address this issue, we combined statistics from two different national complex surveys as inputs for the numerator and denominator to estimate injury rate, accounting for the time spent in specific activities and included a procedure to estimate variance using the combined surveys. METHODS: The 2010 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to quantify injuries, and the 2010 American Time Use Survey (ATUS) was used to quantify time of exposure to specific activities. The injury rate was estimated by dividing the average number of injuries (from NHIS) by average exposure hours (from ATUS), both measured for specific activities. The variance was calculated using the 'delta method', a general method for variance estimation with complex surveys. RESULTS: Among the five types of injuries examined, 'sport and exercise' had the highest rate (12.64 injuries per 100 000 h), followed by 'working around house/yard' (6.14), driving/riding a motor vehicle (2.98), working (1.45) and sleeping/resting/eating/drinking (0.23). The results show a ranking of injury rate by activity quite different from estimates using population as the denominator. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach produces an estimate of injury risk which includes activity exposure time and may more reliably reflect the underlying injury risks, offering an alternative method for injury surveillance and research.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Home/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Public Health , Accidents, Home/prevention & control , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Analysis of Variance , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
9.
Chronobiol Int ; 33(6): 630-49, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27092404

ABSTRACT

Approximately 10% of the employed population in the United States works in multiple jobs. They are more likely to work long hours and in nonstandard work schedules, factors known to impact sleep duration and quality, and increase the risk of injury. In this study we used multivariate regression models to compare the duration of sleep in a 24-hour period between workers working in multiple jobs (MJHs) with single job holders (SJHs) controlling for other work schedule and demographic factors. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics US American Time Use Survey (ATUS) pooled over a 9-year period (2003-2011). We found that MJHs had significantly reduced sleep duration compared with SJHs due to a number of independent factors, such as working longer hours and more often late at night. Male MJHs, working in their primary job or more than one job on the diary day, also had significantly shorter sleep durations (up to 40 minutes less on a weekend day) than male SJHs, even after controlling for all other factors. Therefore, duration of work hours, time of day working and duration of travel for work may not be the only factors to consider when understanding if male MJHs are able to fit in enough recuperative rest from their busy schedule. Work at night had the greatest impact on sleep duration for females, reducing sleep time by almost an hour compared with females who did not work at night. We also hypothesize that the high frequency or fragmentation of non-leisure activities (e.g. work and travel for work) throughout the day and between jobs may have an additional impact on the duration and quality of sleep for MJHs.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Sleep/physiology , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States , Young Adult
10.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0150939, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26977599

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Falls are the leading cause of unintentional injuries in the U.S.; however, national estimates for all community-dwelling adults are lacking. This study estimated the national incidence of falls and fall-related injuries among community-dwelling U.S. adults by age and gender and the trends in fall-related injuries across the adult life span. METHODS: Nationally representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2008 Balance and Dizziness supplement was used to develop national estimates of falls, and pooled data from the NHIS was used to calculate estimates of fall-related injuries in the U.S. and related trends from 2004-2013. Costs of unintentional fall-related injuries were extracted from the CDC's Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. RESULTS: Twelve percent of community-dwelling U.S. adults reported falling in the previous year for a total estimate of 80 million falls at a rate of 37.2 falls per 100 person-years. On average, 9.9 million fall-related injuries occurred each year with a rate of 4.38 fall-related injuries per 100 person-years. In the previous three months, 2.0% of older adults (65+), 1.1% of middle-aged adults (45-64) and 0.7% of young adults (18-44) reported a fall-related injury. Of all fall-related injuries among community-dwelling adults, 32.3% occurred among older adults, 35.3% among middle-aged adults and 32.3% among younger adults. The age-adjusted rate of fall-related injuries increased 4% per year among older women (95% CI 1%-7%) from 2004 to 2013. Among U.S. adults, the total lifetime cost of annual unintentional fall-related injuries that resulted in a fatality, hospitalization or treatment in an emergency department was 111 billion U.S. dollars in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Falls and fall-related injuries represent a significant health and safety problem for adults of all ages. The findings suggest that adult fall prevention efforts should consider the entire adult lifespan to ensure a greater public health benefit.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , United States
11.
Inj Prev ; 22 Suppl 1: i34-42, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26728004

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Vast amounts of injury narratives are collected daily and are available electronically in real time and have great potential for use in injury surveillance and evaluation. Machine learning algorithms have been developed to assist in identifying cases and classifying mechanisms leading to injury in a much timelier manner than is possible when relying on manual coding of narratives. The aim of this paper is to describe the background, growth, value, challenges and future directions of machine learning as applied to injury surveillance. METHODS: This paper reviews key aspects of machine learning using injury narratives, providing a case study to demonstrate an application to an established human-machine learning approach. RESULTS: The range of applications and utility of narrative text has increased greatly with advancements in computing techniques over time. Practical and feasible methods exist for semiautomatic classification of injury narratives which are accurate, efficient and meaningful. The human-machine learning approach described in the case study achieved high sensitivity and PPV and reduced the need for human coding to less than a third of cases in one large occupational injury database. CONCLUSIONS: The last 20 years have seen a dramatic change in the potential for technological advancements in injury surveillance. Machine learning of 'big injury narrative data' opens up many possibilities for expanded sources of data which can provide more comprehensive, ongoing and timely surveillance to inform future injury prevention policy and practice.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/classification , Data Mining/methods , Machine Learning , Occupational Injuries/classification , Population Surveillance/methods , Databases, Factual , Humans , Models, Theoretical
12.
J Safety Res ; 55: 53-62, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26683547

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although occupational injuries are among the leading causes of death and disability around the world, the burden due to occupational injuries has historically been under-recognized, obscuring the need to address a major public health problem. METHODS: We established the Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index (LMWSI) to provide a reliable annual metric of the leading causes of the most serious workplace injuries in the United States based on direct workers compensation (WC) costs. RESULTS: More than $600 billion in direct WC costs were spent on the most disabling compensable non-fatal injuries and illnesses in the United States from 1998 to 2010. The burden in 2010 remained similar to the burden in 1998 in real terms. The categories of overexertion ($13.6B, 2010) and fall on same level ($8.6B, 2010) were consistently ranked 1st and 2nd. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The LMWSI was created to establish the relative burdens of events leading to work-related injury so they could be better recognized and prioritized. Such a ranking might be used to develop research goals and interventions to reduce the burden of workplace injury in the United States.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/economics , Accidents, Occupational/economics , Disabled Persons , Health Expenditures , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Injuries/economics , Safety/economics , Adult , Health Care Costs , Humans , Public Health , United States , Work , Workers' Compensation/economics , Workplace/economics
13.
J Occup Environ Med ; 57(12): 1275-83, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26492383

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine the impact of state workers' compensation (WC) policies regarding wage replacement and medical benefits on medical costs and length of disability (LOD) in workers with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LBP claims from 49 states (n = 59,360) filed between 2002 and 2008, extracted from a large WC administrative database. RESULTS: Longer retroactive periods and state WC laws allowing treating provider choice were associated with higher medical costs and longer LOD. Limiting the option to change providers and having a fee schedule were associated with longer LOD, except that allowing a one-time treating provider change was associated with lower medical costs and shorter LOD. CONCLUSIONS: WC policies about wage replacement and medical treatment appear to be associated with WC LBP outcomes, and might represent opportunities to improve LOD and reduce medical costs in occupational LBP.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Occupational Diseases/rehabilitation , Return to Work/statistics & numerical data , Workers' Compensation/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/economics , Retrospective Studies , Return to Work/economics , United States , Young Adult
14.
Accid Anal Prev ; 84: 165-76, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26412196

ABSTRACT

Public health surveillance programs in the U.S. are undergoing landmark changes with the availability of electronic health records and advancements in information technology. Injury narratives gathered from hospital records, workers compensation claims or national surveys can be very useful for identifying antecedents to injury or emerging risks. However, classifying narratives manually can become prohibitive for large datasets. The purpose of this study was to develop a human-machine system that could be relatively easily tailored to routinely and accurately classify injury narratives from large administrative databases such as workers compensation. We used a semi-automated approach based on two Naïve Bayesian algorithms to classify 15,000 workers compensation narratives into two-digit Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) event (leading to injury) codes. Narratives were filtered out for manual review if the algorithms disagreed or made weak predictions. This approach resulted in an overall accuracy of 87%, with consistently high positive predictive values across all two-digit BLS event categories including the very small categories (e.g., exposure to noise, needle sticks). The Naïve Bayes algorithms were able to identify and accurately machine code most narratives leaving only 32% (4853) for manual review. This strategy substantially reduces the need for resources compared with manual review alone.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Bayes Theorem , Clinical Coding , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Narration , Prevalence , Reproducibility of Results , United States/epidemiology
15.
Am J Public Health ; 104(8): 1488-500, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24922135

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compared work and lifestyle activities for workers who work in 1 job with those who work in multiple jobs during a 1-week period. METHODS: We used information from the 2003-2011 American Time Use Survey to classify workers into 6 work groups based on whether they were a single (SJH) or multiple (MJH) job holder and whether they worked their primary, other, multiple, or no job on the diary day. RESULTS: The MJHs often worked 2 part-time jobs (20%), long weekly hours (27% worked 60+ hours), and on weekends. The MJHs working multiple jobs on the diary day averaged more than 2 additional work hours (2.25 weekday, 2.75 weekend day; P < .05), odd hours (more often between 5 pm and 7 am), with more work travel time (10 minutes weekday, 9 minutes weekend day; P < .05) and less sleep (-45 minutes weekday, -62 minutes weekend day; P < .05) and time for other household (P < .05) and leisure (P < .05) activities than SJHs. CONCLUSIONS: Because of long work hours, long daily commutes, multiple shifts, and less sleep and leisure time, MJHs may be at heightened risk of fatigue and injury.


Subject(s)
Employment/psychology , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Status , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology
16.
Am J Public Health ; 104(1): 134-42, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24228681

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We compared the risk of injury for multiple job holders (MJHs) with that for single job holders (SJHs). METHODS: We used information from the National Health Interview Survey for the years 1997 through 2011 to estimate the rate of multiple job holding in the United States and compared characteristics and rates of self-reported injury (work and nonwork) for SJHs versus MJHs. RESULTS: Approximately 8.4% of those employed reported working more than 1 job in the week before the interview. The rate of work and nonwork injury episodes per 100 employed workers was higher for MJHs than for SJHs (4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.5, 4.8; vs 3.3; 95% CI = 3.1, 3.5 work injuries and 9.9; 95% CI = 8.9, 10.9; vs 7.4; 95% CI = 7.1, 7.6 nonwork injuries per 100 workers, respectively). When calculated per 100 full-time equivalents (P < .05), the rate ratio remained higher for MJHs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that working in multiple jobs is associated with an increased risk of an injury, both at work and not at work, and should be considered in injury surveillance.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
17.
Am J Public Health ; 103(11): 1989-96, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028255

ABSTRACT

Developing nations bear a substantial portion of the global burden of injury. Public health surveillance models in developing countries should recognize injury risks for all levels of society and all causes and should incorporate various groups of workers and industries, including subsistence agriculture. However, many developing nations do not have an injury registration system; current data collection methods result in gross national undercounts of injuries, failing to distinguish injuries that occur during work. In 2006, we established an active surveillance system in Vietnam's Xuan Tien commune and investigated potential methods for surveillance of work-related injuries. On the basis of our findings, we recommend a national model for work-related injury surveillance in Vietnam that builds on the existing health surveillance system.


Subject(s)
Data Collection/methods , Models, Theoretical , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Population Surveillance/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Data Collection/standards , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mandatory Reporting , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Inj Prev ; 19(2): 92-9, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22661204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Injuries are a leading cause of work-related disability and death in rapidly developing countries such as Vietnam. The authors' objective was to demonstrate the utility of detailed injury narratives, derived from a household survey, in providing information on the determinants of work-related injuries to inform potential intervention targets. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey administered to 2615 households of a rapidly developing community of Vietnam where many workers engage in both agriculture and industrial work, the authors collected information about self-reported work-related injuries, annual hours worked in each industry and narrative text describing the circumstances of each injury. The authors used a customised coding taxonomy to describe injury scenarios. RESULTS: Several intervention themes emerged, including the implementation of machine guarding, the use of cut resistant gloves and safety glasses which would benefit the small- and medium-sized enterprises. Calculation of incidence rates using full-time equivalents, stratified by work group, provided some unexpected observations of the risks of working in agriculture; workers who work in agriculture in addition to another industry are at an increased risk of fatigue or overexertion and other consequences of working too hard in their agricultural activities. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of aggregate injury statistics makes it difficult for the owners of small- and medium-sized enterprises to recognise a priori the most effective safety interventions. This analysis of detailed injury narratives with an appropriate taxonomic basis offers the ability to focus on the level of cause, activity and source and may inform the choice of various potential interventions at the workplace or enterprise level.


Subject(s)
Accident Prevention/methods , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Narration , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population , Safety/standards , Vietnam/epidemiology
19.
Am J Ind Med ; 55(3): 205-16, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22161813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Developing nations carry a substantial portion of the global burden of injury, but without reliable injury surveillance, there is no way to characterize or prioritize the causes of work-related injury for prevention. METHODS: Injury data from 52 treatment sites in the Xuan Tien Commune, Vietnam with over 10,000 inhabitants were collected between January 1 and December 31, 2006. Injured residents were interviewed to determine work-relatedness, relevant causes, disability, and burden. RESULTS: Five hundred four work-related injuries were reported from formal treatment sites (incidence rate of 87 per 1,000 FTE) with a mean lost work day of 11 days. Four thousand five hundred seventy-four lost work day equivalents were estimated based on actual days lost to recover plus work days lost earning income to pay for medical costs, accumulating a total direct burden to the community of 8,641 lost work day equivalents. Almost half of that burden was caused by work in manufacturing. First aid boxes placed in 40 manufacturing enterprises yielded the 2nd highest reporting source. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and value at the local level to build an active injury surveillance system which could have a large impact on preventing the burden of injuries in workplaces in Vietnam.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Agriculture , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Accidents, Occupational/economics , Community Health Services , Developing Countries , Humans , Industry , Occupational Injuries/economics , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Vietnam/epidemiology
20.
Am J Public Health ; 101(5): 854-60, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21490336

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We explored the impact on work-related injuries of workers splitting time between industry and agriculture, a common situation in developing countries. METHODS: In 2005, we administered a cross-sectional survey to 2615 households of Xuan Tien, a developing rural community of Vietnam, regarding self-reported injuries and hours worked for 1 year. We defined groups as working in industry, agriculture, or a mix of both. RESULTS: Overlapping employment (part time in agriculture and up to full time in industry) increased the risk of injury in both agricultural and industrial work. This pattern held across all work groups defined by the relative amount of time worked in agriculture. Those working fewer than 500 hours annually in agriculture had an agricultural injury rate (872 per 1000 full-time equivalents) that was more than 4 times higher than the average rate overall (203 per 1000) and the rate for workers employed only in industry (178 per 1000). CONCLUSIONS: Working in agriculture for short durations while working in industry increased the risk of injury substantially in both types of work.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/statistics & numerical data , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Poisson Distribution , Population Surveillance , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...