Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 55(5): 277-281, mayo 2008. ilus, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-59135

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Los tubos endobronquiales de doble luz (TDL)se utilizan en cirugía torácica para la intubación selectiva pulmonar,necesaria para la ventilación unipulmonar. La comprobaciónde su correcta colocación se realiza mediante fibrobroncoscopia.Presentamos un método simple y alternativopara ayudar a la comprobación del posicionamiento de losTDL izquierdos, que consiste en pasar una sonda de aspiraciónpor la rama traqueal del TDL. Nuestra hipótesis es quesi la sonda pasa sin dificultad el tubo estaría colocado correctamente.El objetivo de este estudio fue la determinación de lasensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba.MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Pacientes programados para cirugíatorácica electiva de neumonectomía o lobectomíaizquierdas. Tras pasar la sonda por el TDL izquierdo secomprobó con el fibrobroncoscopio (técnica de referencia),comparándose ambos métodos.RESULTADO: Se incluyeron 100 pacientes. De los casosestudiados, en el 88% se dedujo una correcta posición delTDL por paso de sonda sin resistencia. De estos, en el 84%la fibrobroncoscopia corroboró esta situación mientras queen el 4% restante no fue así y hubo que recolocarlos. En el12% se encontró resistencia al pasar la sonda verificándoseen éstos una mala colocación por fibrobroncoscopio.CONCLUSIONES: Si dominamos esta técnica o si no disponemosde fibrobroncoscopio, esta maniobra puede ser útily de mucha ayuda durante la colocación de los TDLizquierdos. Nuestros resultados apoyan la práctica cotidianade esta maniobra, ya que es un método sencillo y accesible,pero recordando que la comprobación mediantefibrobroncoscopio es la técnica de referencia actualmente (AU)


OBJETIVE: Double lumen endotracheal tubes (DLTs)are used in thoracic surgery for selective bronchialintubation, which is required for single lung ventilation.Correct placement of the tube is checked by means offiberoptic bronchoscopy. We present a simple alternativemethod to help confirm the correct placement of left-sidedDLTs. The method consists of passing a suction catheterthrough the tracheal lumen of the tube. Our hypothesiswas that if the catheter can be inserted without difficulty,the tube is correctly placed. The objective was todetermine the sensitivity and specificity of that criterion.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied patients scheduledfor elective left pneumonectomy or lobectomy. After passingthe catheter through the left-sided DLT, placement waschecked by means of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (gold standard)and the results were compared with the placementassessment based on ease of insertion.RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. The DLTwas judged to be correctly placed in 88% of patients inwhom the catheter was inserted without resistance.Bronchoscopy corroborated this finding in 84% of cases;the tube was found to be incorrectly placed in theremaining 4% of cases and had to be reinserted. Resistancewas noted in 12% of cases and bronchoscopy confirmedthat the tube was incorrectly placed in those patients.CONCLUSIONS: This technique can be very useful inplacing left-sided DLTs in situations where fiberopticbronchoscopy is not available and if the anesthesiologisthas a thorough command of the method. Our resultssupport the routine use of this criterion as it is simple andeasy to learn. It should be remembered, however, thatconfirmation of placement by means of fiberopticbronchoscopy is currently the gold standard technique (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Pneumonectomy/methods , Anesthesia/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Catheterization , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 54(10): 612-620, dic. 2007. ilus
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-71934

ABSTRACT

El traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) continúasiendo la principal causa de mortalidad y morbilidad dela gente joven en Europa. La utilización de la tecnologíaen el manejo de los traumatismos craneoencefálicosseveros se ha incrementado de manera considerable ypuede llegar a presentar aspectos confusos para losfacultativos involucrados en el manejo del paciente crítico con poca experiencia en el campo de la neurología. La monitorización cerebral de los pacientes con alteraciones intracraneales generalmente se focaliza en el manejo de la presión intracraneal y la monitorización de la presión de perfusión cerebral. Recientemente nuevas técnicas se han incorporado a nuestra rutina habitual para la monitorizaciónde la oxigenación cerebral y el metabolismo.La monitorización continua de la presión parcial de oxígeno cerebral (PtiO2) se ha incrementado en las unidades de cuidados neurocríticos permitiendo valorar a la cabecera del paciente la repercusión de las lesiones titulares y de las maniobras terapéuticas. Este manuscrito trata de revisar y ahondar en todo aquello que representa la presión parcial de oxígeno cerebral, tanto en aspectos técnicos, seguridad, fiabilidad así como todo aquello que nos puede aportar respecto a otras técnicas para evaluar la oxigenación cerebral


Head injury continues to be the main cause ofmortality and morbidity among young people inEurope. The use of technology in managing severe headinjury has increased considerably and certainapplications may be confusing to physicians who havelittle experience in neurology but who are charged withproviding neurocritical care. Monitoring of braininjuredpatients usually focuses on managingintracranial pressure and recording perfusion pressure.New techniques have recently been incorporated intoroutine monitoring of oxygenation and metabolism inthe brain. Continuous monitoring of the partial oxygenpressure of brain tissue (PtO2) has become morecommon in neurocritical care units, making bedsideevaluation of the effects of injuries and therapeuticmeasures possible. This review discusses technical,safety, and reliability aspects of PtO2 monitoring and its potential advantages in comparison with othertechniques for evaluating brain tissue oxygenation


Subject(s)
Humans , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Craniocerebral Trauma/physiopathology , Critical Care/methods
3.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 54(10): 612-20, 2007 Dec.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18200997

ABSTRACT

Head injury continues to be the main cause of mortality and morbidity among young people in Europe. The use of technology in managing severe head injury has increased considerably and certain applications may be confusing to physicians who have little experience in neurology but who are charged with providing neurocritical care. Monitoring of brain-injured patients usually focuses on managing intracranial pressure and recording perfusion pressure. New techniques have recently been incorporated into routine monitoring of oxygenation and metabolism in the brain. Continuous monitoring of the partial oxygen pressure of brain tissue (PtO2) has become more common in neurocritical care units, making bedside evaluation of the effects of injuries and therapeutic measures possible. This review discusses technical, safety, and reliability aspects of PtO2 monitoring and its potential advantages in comparison with other techniques for evaluating brain tissue oxygenation.


Subject(s)
Brain Chemistry , Brain Injuries/metabolism , Critical Care/methods , Oximetry/methods , Oxygen/analysis , Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/physiopathology , Brain Injuries/therapy , Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheterization/methods , Cerebrovascular Circulation , Craniotomy , Electrodes, Implanted , Equipment Design , Humans , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/diagnosis , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/etiology , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/metabolism , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Intracranial Hypertension/physiopathology , Intracranial Hypertension/surgery , Monitoring, Physiologic , Oximetry/instrumentation , Partial Pressure , Point-of-Care Systems , Prognosis
6.
In. Alvarez Leiva, Carlos; Chuliá Campos, Vicente; Hernando Lorenzo, Antonio E. Manual de asistencia sanitaria en las catástrofes. Madrid, Libro del Año, 1992. p.309-17, ilus, tab.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-7889
7.
In. Alvarez Leiva, Carlos; Chuliá Campos, Vicente; Hernando Lorenzo, Antonio E. Manual de asistencia sanitaria en las catástrofes. Madrid, Libro del Año, 1992. p.329-37, ilus, tab.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-7891
8.
In. Jornadas Cívico - Militares de Sanidad, 1. Mesas redondas. Madrid, España. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Centro de Publicaciones, Documentación y Biblioteca, 1986. p.305-16, ilus, mapas, Tab.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-4819
14.
Valencia; España. Ministerio de Defensa;Valencia. Generalitat Valenciana; 1990. 12 p.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-1647
15.
Valencia; España. Ministerio de Defensa;Valencia. Generalitat Valenciana; 1990. 6 p.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-1650
16.
Valencia; España. Ministerio de Defensa;Valencia. Generalitat Valenciana; 1990. 23 p. ilus, mapas, tab.
Monography in Es | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-1653
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...